Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

Sorry it's the mail but Wetherspoons in Leeds, sounds fucking lovely. What a bunch!

 

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8603747/Drinker-tells-student-looks-like-Jew-says-GASSED-lot-you.html

 

I might give that pub a miss.


There’s a massive problem with ‘locals’ and students not getting on in Leeds.

 

The locals feel like their city is being taken over, whilst in fact, a bit like Lancaster and a fair few other cities, those student loan payments help prop up a their cities/towns.

 

Nowt like insular, petty, parochialism to really get cunts to gel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NASA has signaled it is joining the social justice movement by changing unofficial and potentially contentious names used by the scientific community for distant cosmic objects and systems such as planets, galaxies and nebulae.

In a statement last week, the space agency said that as the “community works to identify and address systemic discrimination and inequality in all aspects of the field, it has become clear that certain cosmic nicknames are not only insensitive, but can be actively harmful”.

 

 

 

Black Holes Matter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 


Nasa to change 'harmful' and insensitive' planet and galaxy nicknames
Space agency says ‘certain cosmic nicknames are insensitive’ and vows to drop any reference to them


Planetary nebula NGC 2392, previously known as the ‘Eskimo Nebula’.
Nasa has signaled it is joining the social justice movement by changing unofficial and potentially contentious names used by the scientific community for distant cosmic objects and systems such as planets, galaxies and nebulae.

In a statement last week, the space agency said that as the “community works to identify and address systemic discrimination and inequality in all aspects of the field, it has become clear that certain cosmic nicknames are not only insensitive, but can be actively harmful”.

Nasa added that it is “examining its use of unofficial terminology for cosmic objects as part of its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion”.

One of the steps Nasa would immediately take would be to drop references to planetary nebula NGC 2392 known as the “Eskimo Nebula”, a dying Sun-like star that is blowing off its outer layers. “Eskimo”, the agency said, “is widely viewed as a colonial term with a racist history, imposed on the indigenous people of Arctic regions.”


It will also cease to refer to a pair of spiral galaxies, NGC 4567 and NGC 4568, in the Virgo Galaxy Cluster referred to as the “Siamese Twins Galaxy”, as part of its effort to align cosmic objects with current thinking and conventions.

“These nicknames and terms may have historical or culture connotations that are objectionable or unwelcoming, and Nasa is strongly committed to addressing them,” said Stephen Shih, associate administrator for diversity and equal opportunity at Nasa. “Science depends on diverse contributions, and benefits everyone, so this means we must make it inclusive.”

In future, Nasa said it will use only the official, International Astronomical Union designations in cases where nicknames are inappropriate. Cosmic objects, such as Barnard 33, nicknamed “the Horsehead Nebula” would be retain their names.

The “Siamese Twin Galaxy” was so-named by Frederick William Herschel, the British, German-born astronomer and composer. Herschel also identified and named the “Eskimo Nebula” which he described in January 1787 as “a star 9th magnitude with a pretty bright middle, nebulosity equally dispersed all around. A very remarkable phenomenon.”

Herschel then spent nine years surveying the heavens for double stars, publishing catalogues of nebulae in 1802 (2,500 objects) and in 1820 (5,000 objects). Among Herschel’s achievements was to note a new object in the constellation of Gemini.

It was confirmed to be a new planet, named Uranus, and considered to be the first planet to be discovered since antiquity. He also identified the planet’s moons, Titania and Oberon, as well as Enceladus and Mimas, both moons of Saturn.

But his nomenclature will now fall from official use at the US agency, said Thomas Zurbuchen, associate administrator of Nasa’s science mission directorate in Washington.

“Our goal is that all names are aligned with our values of diversity and inclusion, and we’ll proactively work with the scientific community to help ensure that. Science is for everyone, and every facet of our work needs to reflect that value,” Zurbuchen said.

 

 

Thank Christ. I'm sure the Universe will breathe more easily after this brave, stunning victory that is in no way pure tokenism in the slightest.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pistonbroke
3 hours ago, Mudface said:

 

Thank Christ. I'm sure the Universe will breathe more easily after this brave, stunning victory that is in no way pure tokenism in the slightest.

 

To be fair they were way ahead of the ball, they put a kneel Neil on the Moon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 09/08/2020 at 03:33, Mudface said:

 

Thank Christ. I'm sure the Universe will breathe more easily after this brave, stunning victory that is in no way pure tokenism in the slightest.

I wouldn't be too quick to sneer. Every organisation needs to take a look at itself for any examples of racism in the organisational culture. Some things will take time and be difficult to change; others (like informal names for things) are much easier.  They would be wrong to persist in using racist terminology, so their action in dropping it deserves acknowledgement. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

I wouldn't be too quick to sneer. Every organisation needs to take a look at itself for any examples of racism in the organisational culture. Some things will take time and be difficult to change; others (like informal names for things) are much easier.  They would be wrong to persist in using racist terminology, so their action in dropping it deserves acknowledgement. 

I could never understand, why is the term "Eskimo" considered racist by itself? I always thought it had all the same connotations as "Inuit". Also, when you look at the Wikipedia entry for Eskimo, it is still used to denote a group of peoples and languages which includes Inuits. 

And what is wrong with Siamese twins? Is Siam racist?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

I wouldn't be too quick to sneer. Every organisation needs to take a look at itself for any examples of racism in the organisational culture. Some things will take time and be difficult to change; others (like informal names for things) are much easier.  They would be wrong to persist in using racist terminology, so their action in dropping it deserves acknowledgement. 

I see what you mean, but it just seems to be a bit of a waste of time. I doubt the problem is widespread, and that anybody really has an issue with, for example, the trivial name for a nebula or galaxy having the term 'Eskimo' or 'Siamese twins' in it. It just looks like a token gesture when there are much bigger issues around which people's time and effort would be better spent on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SasaS said:

I could never understand, why is the term "Eskimo" considered racist by itself? I always thought it had all the same connotations as "Inuit". Also, when you look at the Wikipedia entry for Eskimo, it is still used to denote a group of peoples and languages which includes Inuits. 

And what is wrong with Siamese twins? Is Siam racist?

Siam is the former name of Thailand so maybe Siam is a link to a colonial name?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, VladimirIlyich said:

Siam is the former name of Thailand so maybe Siam is a link to a colonial name?

I know, but you have traditional, historic use of the term Siam, from when it was a former name, hence the Siamese twins for conjoined twins. It sounds silly to go back and change historical, traditional names, Summer in Siam song should be renamed Summer in Thailand, or the film Mission to Burma Mission to Myanmar. George Orwell's Myanmar Days? Also, Thailand sounds equally colonial to me, "land of the Thais", and in English.

It would smack of tokenism, here is a press release, look at as being so progressive. Like all those companies recently boycotting Facebook and telling us about it, until you read that big companies are less than 6% of Facebook's revenues, and advertising on Facebook is even less in their advertising budget, so they calculated that the promotional value of telling us they are boycotting Facebook to make it fight hate speech (for free) is greater than one or two months of advertising on FB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, SasaS said:

I know, but you have traditional, historic use of the term Siam, from when it was a former name, hence the Siamese twins for conjoined twins. It sounds silly to go back and change historical, traditional names, Summer in Siam song should be renamed Summer in Thailand, or the film Mission to Burma Mission to Myanmar. George Orwell's Myanmar Days? Also, Thailand sounds equally colonial to me, "land of the Thais", and in English.

It would smack of tokenism, here is a press release, look at as being so progressive. Like all those companies recently boycotting Facebook and telling us about it, until you read that big companies are less than 6% of Facebook's revenues, and advertising on Facebook is even less in their advertising budget, so they calculated that the promotional value of telling us they are boycotting Facebook to make it fight hate speech (for free) is greater than one or two months of advertising on FB.

I really hate that virtue signalling from big companies- just pay your fucking taxes and stop pretending that decorating your coffee cups with a rainbow actually achieves anything.

 

Going back to the NASA story, this is also the kind of thing that leads to ridicule and dilution of the overriding message, like the aims of the BLM movement being trivialised over citing a Coco Pops packet as racist for example. It's easy for the Twitterati pricks and alt-right bloggers to develop the notion that it isn't serious, just a bunch of lefty liberal loudmouths kicking up a stink about minor issues and get things dismissed in a lot of minds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...