Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Recommended Posts

To strengthen a class based divide and in a political context, it was said that after Karl Marx watched a game of cricket, he decided that ‘a revolution in England was improbable’ (Carrington, 1990)[12]. This was due to the fact that Marx thought that ‘if the masses could be so easily subdued by such a resolutely sedate game with its mores of bourgeois Englishness dripping from every rule and expression, then all was lost for the socialist cause’.

Cunt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Cozier was up there with Benaud. Can't believe he was only 75 - he has looked really ill for years. 

 

One of the truly great cricket commentators and journalists. Like Benaud he seemed to speak with moral authority about cricket in his native region and in the world. Always traditional but never reactionary. Genuinely warm and entertaining. I loved listening to him because it sounded like he loved commentating. he always knew how to get the best out of his co-commentators and elicited the respect of the likes of Boycott and Viv. Magisterial and funny. A massive, massive loss to world cricket.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pistonbroke

Sad news about Cozier. 

 

I see the County Championship has gotten off to the same shambolic start as usual due to the weather having the biggest say on results. Out of the 17 matches played so far in Division 1 only 4 have produced a result with the majority of the draws being affected by the weather. It's about time the powers that be sorted the calendar out better or the structure of the points system. The calendar could easily be dealt with by having  a three tier system or each team just playing each other once. The point system could be tweaked by saying matches affected by a certain amount of time lost to the weather would be decided on first innings scores whereas the winners would be given 10 points instead of the pathetic 5 points handed out for a draw. The losers in such scenarios could be given the 5 points. A win is 16 points compared to a drawn match which gives 5 points, a team less affected by weather due to geographical reasons or luck get a huge advantage in the big scheme of things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

England will host a day-night Test, according to England and Wales Cricket Board chairman Colin Graves.

 

 

Australia held the first day-night Test against New Zealand in November in the hope of attracting larger crowds and a peak-time TV audience.

 

"You can't turn your back on it, it will happen," Graves told BBC Sport.

"We just have to decide when it is going to happen. We're doing a lot of work on it and we'd love to see day-night cricket."

In a wide-ranging interview to be broadcast during Test Match Special's coverage of the first day of the first Test between England and Sri Lanka at Headingley on Thursday, Graves also said:

  • Live Test cricket will never again appear on terrestrial television
  • Two or three counties were prevented from going bust in the past year
  • A revamped T20 competition will not be themed on franchises but could have city-based teams
  • Test cricket is safe so long as governing bodies move to protect it
  • Counties should look to hold day-night first-class matches
  •  

'Make Test cricket meaningful'

England have announced plans for this summer's contests against Sri Lanka and Pakistan to be multi-format 'Super Series', with points on offer for Test, one-day international and Twenty20 matches.

 

Currently, the world Test rankings are the only global form of competition for the five-day game, with plans to hold a World Test Championship in 2013 scrapped in 2011.

 

"We have to make Test cricket meaningful and we have to put some 'oomph' behind it," Graves said.

"Test cricket is safe if we do something about it, but I don't think it is safe if we do nothing. That is not an option. The International Cricket Council are looking at it and the other countries are looking at it."

 

'Live Test cricket will never return to terrestrial TV'

Live Test match cricket was last seen on terrestrial television in the UK in 2005, with all of England's matches since then being shown by Sky.

Some nine years after the move, in 2014, the ECB's own participation figures showed that the number of people playing recreationally had dropped.

"We'd like to see some live cricket on terrestrial television, but Test cricket will not be on terrestrial television," Graves said. 

"The younger generation do not watch terrestrial television, they use social media. We have to take that into account. It will be a mix-and-match situation for us to come out with the right formula."

 

Who mentioned franchises?

The domestic Twenty20 competition in England has often been a target for criticism, with some favouring the franchise model used by the Indian Premier League and the Big Bash in Australia.

The current model of 18 counties split into two divisions of nine and looking to reach the quarter-finals will remain in place until 2019, when the existing broadcast deal expires.

Graves said there could be "four or five" options for a new-look competition, potentially including city-based teams, but with a franchise model not under consideration.

"I have never mentioned the word franchise once, but it's all people talk about," Graves said. "I don't believe it is the right model for English cricket.

"We want to keep all 18 counties involved. I'm sure cities could be one option, but we have no preconceived idea of what we want. We don't have a preferred option. We will put them all on the table then decide the right way to go."

 

'I want 18 counties'

From 2017, the domestic first-class structure will be altered to a top flight of eight teams and a second tier of 10 from the current system of two nine-team divisions.

With debate ongoing over how much cricket should be played and how the counties can sustain themselves financially, Graves said he favours an 18-county structure and could even imagine a scenario where that is expanded.

However, he also revealed debt within the game totalling £120m and that "two or three counties" have been saved from going bust in the past year.

 

"I've always said I want 18 counties," he said. "It annoys me that people say we will not sustain 18 counties - we've never said that. We could have even let two or three go bust during the past year. We haven't done that. If we haven't done that in the last year, why would we change?

 

"I could give you a case where the domestic game could sustain more than 18 counties, but we do have £120m debt in the game and we have to manage that. We have to get the competitions right. It's about how we use the money."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...