Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Recommended Posts

A Berkshire man has been jailed for posting abusive messages online about a schoolgirl after she committed suicide.

 

Sean Duffy, 25, of Reading, was handed an 18-week sentence for posts on social networking sites about Worcestershire teenager Natasha MacBryde.

 

He previously pleaded guilty at Reading Magistrates' Court to sending indecent or offensive communications.

 

Police said Duffy also posted abuse about dead teenagers in Northumberland, Gloucestershire and Staffordshire.

 

Duffy, of Grovelands Road, admitted two offences of "trolling" a term used to describe the trend of anonymously seeking to provoke outrage by posting insults and abuse online.

 

They related to Facebook and YouTube posts about Miss MacBryde, 15, from Bromsgrove, who Duffy had never met.

 

He was traced by police through information from his internet service provider and arrested.

 

Duffy subsequently posted anonymous messages on a remembrance page - "Monday 14th February will always be remembered as Tasha MacBryde day" - set up by her 17-year-old brother James to allow friends and family to pay their respects to the teenager.

 

In one of the posts he called her a slut. He also posted a video on YouTube, entitled Tasha the Tank Engine, showing the children's character Thomas the Tank Engine with Miss MacBryde's face.

 

Jo Belsey, prosecuting, said the family were "understandably outraged, disgusted and hurt".

 

In a statement read to the court, her father Andrew MacBryde said he "could not believe anyone could stoop to such depths" after his son told him of the online posts.

 

He added that Duffy's actions had "added to the horror of dealing with the death of their beautiful daughter".

 

The magistrates were also asked to consider three other cases when sentencing Duffy, who the court heard suffers with alcohol problems and has Asperger's syndrome.

 

He had also posted offensive messages about Lauren Drew, 14, of Gloucestershire, who was found dead after suffering a suspected epileptic seizure, Hayley Bates, 16, of Staffordshire, who died in a car crash, and Jordan Cooper, 14, who was stabbed to death in Northumberland.

 

On Mother's Day he posted a message on an online memorial page to Lauren reading: "Help me mummy, it's hot in hell".

 

Duffy also produced an image of Hayley with crosses on her eyes and red marks on her face. He also wrote explicit messages to Hayley's sister Heather.

 

The family of stabbing victim Jordan had also seen abusive messages directed at the youngster on an online memorial and a YouTube video defacing an image of the teenager.

 

Outside court, Lauren's father Mark Drew said: "Lauren didn't deserve this.

 

"Seeing him in court was really hard. I was so angry.

 

"Lauren was my only daughter and I worshipped the ground she walked on.

 

"This person hid behind the computer screen with no feeling."

 

Mr Drew urged Facebook do do more to prevent the website being misused, adding that it was "a wonderful thing if used right".

 

Lance Whiteford, mitigating, said Duffy had been diagnosed with Asperger's syndrome at an early age and one of the characteristics was an inability to judge the reaction of others.

 

He said Duffy had also struggled with alcohol problems and lived "a miserable existence".

 

Duffy had no previous convictions but had received one caution for a similar offence.

 

Paul Warren, chairman of the magistrates' bench, said: "This case serves to illustrate the harm and damage done by the malicious misuse of social networking sites."

 

Sherry Adhami, of the charity Beatbullying, said: "Today's ruling is a monumental move towards bullying and cyberbullying being taken more seriously and sends a strong message to society that bullying, whether online or offline, is not going to be tolerated.

 

"It's time that stopping bullying at the source is placed higher on the government's agenda."

 

BBC News - Reading man jailed for dead girl 'trolling' insults

 

Bit harsh on the lad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'd feel the same Vlad but if the lad has Aspergers jail is way over the top. A caution to put the shits up him and an apology would be more appropriate.

 

It's a message job, that's why the media have all been invited to fill their boots. 'Be careful what you say on Facebook'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Numero Veinticinco

Vlad, you're looking from it from an empathetic, emotional perspective. The law shouldn't act that way. This is putting people in prison for something they said. That's an encroachment on all of our freedoms, as disgusting as the horrid bastard is. He's banned from social media networks for five years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a parent if somebody mocked a dead child of mine publicly on a website I would want to rip his head off and shit in the hole.

 

I dont have any sympathy as I think its a shocking thing to do. I do understand the restriction of freedom but its libel,IMO.

 

Me too. However, he does have Asperger's Syndrome which means it's not really shocking at all.

 

People with marked Asperger's have no theory of mind which means in simple terms that they can't put themselves in someone elses' shoes. They have no concept of feelings, neither their own, nor of others. I know it's difficult to comprehend, and I'm not saying for a second that he doesn't deserve punishment, but he does have a disability and I reckon it would be of greater benefit to give him some tuition in social skills than locking him up in a cell. He could be locked up for life, and still won't understand the sickening nature of what he's done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on the level of Aspergers. My brother has quite severe aspergers and so has no understanding of love, hate, or the idea of trolling (or the internet to be fair) but you can have very mild aspergers which barely impacts your life. So without knowing how much this lad suffers it is hard to know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Numero Veinticinco
Well its defamation of character then or at least an offence against the bereaved parents.

There is bad taste if its done once but it seems he did it on a few occasions.

 

There's no law against upsetting bereaved parents - as ghastly and inhuman as his actions are. It's looks like it was this strange piece of law he was in done under.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no law against upsetting bereaved parents - as ghastly and inhuman as his actions are. It's looks like it was this strange piece of law he was in done under.

 

Interesting,thats a decent bit of law to use in cases like this.

 

Its an offence thats morally very wrong and there does deserve to be some sort of penalty attached.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ShoePiss

If the lad didn't understand the impact of his actions due to aspergers why were all of the posting either mocking or simply horrible?

 

I'm unsure where this is all going, you can't bully the dead but this law looks like it may well help cyber bullying in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Numero Veinticinco
Interesting,thats a decent bit of law to use in cases like this.

 

Its an offence thats morally very wrong and there does deserve to be some sort of penalty attached.

 

Maybe, but putting him in prison. In what way is that appropriate? The whole idea about a prison is to lock people away to stop them raping or murdering us. Not to put people who type hurtful shit on the internet, take a pair of shorts from somebody else, or for taking a few chemicals.

 

People don't seem to be able to look past the ridiculous construct of society. These are all bullshit rules, written by fucking posh cunts so that they can justify doing what they fucking well like. And the fucking worst part is that it rarely ever fucking applies to those who put it into action.

 

The world has gone fucking mental. Fuck this, I'm going to become an anarchist.

 

*NOTE: I think this Conservative government might be having a negative effect on my mental health.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe, but putting him in prison. In what way is that appropriate? The whole idea about a prison is to lock people away to stop them raping or murdering us. Not to put people who type hurtful shit on the internet, take a pair of shorts from somebody else, or for taking a few chemicals.

 

As well as a form of punishment and to act as a deterrent. Which in this case seems all fine and dandy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...