Quantcast
Warrior Kit Deal - Not bullshit - Page 4 - FF - Football Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't know how accurate those mock ups are, but I really like the home kit, the away kit isn't too bad. I know Adidas is a huge global brand, but all their football kits are all based on the same design. It'd be quite nice to have something original for a change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Numero Veinticinco
They look like cheap polyester kits you would put a team of 10 year olds in.

 

Pretty hard to tell, considering it's an imagining from somebody who hasn't seen the kit. The eventual kit could be classy as fuck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both look cheap and shite to me.

 

They're in for a shock if they want 50 quid every summer for new tops out of people if they look like that and its worse material from what we're used to

 

Parents dont mind getting them cos of the amount of wear their kids get out of them but if its shite material and they go down the pan then they'll stop getting them

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would prefer the design on the right as the first home kit only in red obviously.

 

Never been keen on messing with the collar, stripes, or white flashes.

 

Keep it simple and traditional please

 

Which I think is what Warrior are trying to do. Keep it simple. The itks on RAWK are complaining that the designs are simple and boring. No pleasing some folk!

I like what they've done with the crest.

Remember this can all be bulls shit!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pretty hard to tell, considering it's an imagining from somebody who hasn't seen the kit. The eventual kit could be classy as fuck.

 

Exactly. As far as I can see they are nothing more than mock ups, I'm sure the actual designs won't be tacky or cheap. Warrior won't be forking out a record amount of money to produce a crappy kit, especially the home one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't worry too much about what the supposed ITKs on RAWK are saying. When word got out that we were to have a charcoal grey away kit for this season, one of those who claimed to have seen it sent a PM to another poster describing it in great detail. That poster did a mock-up and posted it on RAWK. It looked nothing like the final version (it had a light grey crew neck). All it suggests is that they don't know how to describe stuff, or that they're full of shit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That mocked up home top looks very lower leagues to me.

 

Don't know what it is. Maybe its not seeing a Nike/Adidas/decent make badge on it. Can't put my finger on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it fuckin matter as long as it has a Liver Bird on it and the lads play their heart out in it I don't really care it won't effect my support of the team I love.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Does it fuckin matter as long as it has a Liver Bird on it and the lads play their heart out in it I don't really care it won't effect my support of the team I love.

 

Spot on. Give it a season and no one will even notice and as long as the shirt doesn't spontaneously combust while Suarez is about to score a hat trick then I'm happy.

Regarding those that claim to have seen the shirt and that the material is cheap. That can be due to them either being just samples and not using the right material. Or its the right material and that they won't be selling them for £50.00. Remember America is in a recession like everyone else and they want this to work and rather than have shops full of shirts no one can afford why not try making it from less expensive material and 20 quid cheaper?

 

Just an idea

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Spot on. Give it a season and no one will even notice and as long as the shirt doesn't spontaneously combust while Suarez is about to score a hat trick then I'm happy.

Regarding those that claim to have seen the shirt and that the material is cheap. That can be due to them either being just samples and not using the right material. Or its the right material and that they won't be selling them for £50.00. Remember America is in a recession like everyone else and they want this to work and rather than have shops full of shirts no one can afford why not try making it from less expensive material and 20 quid cheaper?

 

Just an idea

 

The shirts don't actually cost that much to make. Even for a company like Warrior that don't have the economies of scale that the likes of Nike or Adidas do, I reckon it would still cost less than £10 to produce the actual shirt. Football shirts have a massive mark-up, partly to cover the cost of all those sponsorship deals with teams and individuals, but mainly because enough people will still buy them regardless of price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The shirts don't actually cost that much to make. Even for a company like Warrior that don't have the economies of scale that the likes of Nike or Adidas do, I reckon it would still cost less than £10 to produce the actual shirt. Football shirts have a massive mark-up, partly to cover the cost of all those sponsorship deals with teams and individuals, but mainly because enough people will still buy them regardless of price.

 

 

I thought it would be less than a tenner to be honest. I just think that in these harsh times that to sell the shirts for 10-20 quid less than the normal price would be a good gesture, would probably result in more being sold and would force the other teams to do the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I thought it would be less than a tenner to be honest. I just think that in these harsh times that to sell the shirts for 10-20 quid less than the normal price would be a good gesture, would probably result in more being sold and would force the other teams to do the same.

 

I doubt Nike and Adidas would do this just because Warrior might. As long as people are happy to keep buying shirts at high prices - and with clubs announcing record sales every year it seems that they are - I don't see prices coming down any time soon, recession or no recession. The larger brands spend so much money on the sport and drive demand, they've effectively put themselves in a situation where they have to hope this trend continues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I doubt Nike and Adidas would do this just because Warrior might. As long as people are happy to keep buying shirts at high prices - and with clubs announcing record sales every year it seems that they are - I don't see prices coming down any time soon, recession or no recession. The larger brands spend so much money on the sport and drive demand, they've effectively put themselves in a situation where they have to hope this trend continues.

 

Things are going to come to a head at some point, it has to surely!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wouldn't worry too much about what the supposed ITKs on RAWK are saying. When word got out that we were to have a charcoal grey away kit for this season, one of those who claimed to have seen it sent a PM to another poster describing it in great detail. That poster did a mock-up and posted it on RAWK. It looked nothing like the final version (it had a light grey crew neck). All it suggests is that they don't know how to describe stuff, or that they're full of shit.

 

 

"RAWK ITKs full of shit" would hardly be an unexpected juncture.

 

Never understood this desperate struggle to know what the new kit looks like before everyone else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant see them altering the current club badge, the badge incorporates the shankly gates and the two eternal flames, they wouldn't want the controversy removing either would cause, it would be a mistake on their part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I cant see them altering the current club badge, the badge incorporates the shankly gates and the two eternal flames, they wouldn't want the controversy removing either would cause, it would be a mistake on their part.

 

i don't think there would be that many complaints if the shankly gates were removed from the badge,for the badge on the shirt i'd prefare a simple liverbird with the flame next to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have wanted the old badge back for years. Would like them to incorporate the eternal flames on it though.

 

Will see if it's real in a few months I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Football teams had to register their logo/crests so as to own the merchandising

So can't see the retro logo being used as that is too similar to the city's. Just like Manchester city had to redesign their crest as it was to close to the city of manchesters

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Gucci_Ledge

Down here in London I see far more people wearing New Balance trainers than Adidas ones, so their marketing can't be too bad. I'm personally looking forward to seeing what they come up with.

 

Also as others have said, nobody solely buys a Liverpool kit because of who makes it or because it looks nice really, it's because they want to own the new Liverpool shirt.

 

Adidas has had its day imo, they are falling behind other brands and the effort they put in with us what non existent. They didn't even try with our kits and our current one is the worst of the lot. the quality of Adidas products is usually cheap and terrible, less and less people wear it, i include the Originals clothing lines too which are shit compared to 5 or 6 years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • Saturday Jun 8:   Fuck all happening at the moment. The most interesting thing I saw today was something on Twitter that might have been complete bollocks for all I know. It got my attention though. Klopp was apparently invited onto the Graham Norton Show but declined, as he preferred to go on holiday instead.    Completely understand why Kloppo couldn’t be arsed with it, as he doesn’t get much opportunity to get away from it all and spend time with the family. Besides, he’s not really into all that celebrity jazz anyway. Still, imagine how fucking funny he’d have been on there. He’s the only manager with the personality to pull a show like that off.   Actually I tell a lie, my man Tim Sherwood could do it. If he had a job. And if he ever actually won something. Tell you who couldn’t pull it off. Pep, the boring bastard. He’d be whining about not getting credit for his treble and telling everyone about how big John Stones' balls are. Actually, that might make decent telly thinking about it.   Is this what the summer is going to reduce me to? Just talking absolute shite about nothing to fill space? Anyone makes a crack that it doesn't take the summer to have me doing that can fuck off.   Oh wait, something did actually happen today. Robbo scored a screamer for Scotland. It was like the shot he had in the final against Spurs only this one went in. Willing to bet here and now that he bags at least a couple like that next year. He’s finding his range I reckon. Imagine how good he’ll be when he adds a few goals to his armoury. We’re talking Balon d’or.
      Sunday Jun 9:   England won the third place game against the Swiss after penalties. I didn’t watch it as to be honest I didn’t even know it was on. I wouldn’t have watched even if I had known, but I might have dipped in and out of it just to check on Shaq.   Trent had a good game, apparently. I only know this because Lineker was tweeting about him. Again. Lineker obsesses about Trent almost as much as Man City’s press office obsesses about the Reds.   In the final, Portugal beat Holland, which is a minor blow to Virgil’s hopes of pipping Messi. It shouldn’t make any difference either way really, but if he’d skippered Holland to this trophy it might have had an influence. Bernardo Silva was named player of the tournament, much to the visible disgust of Ronaldo.        Maybe he is just a selfish, self absorbed, individual glory above the team wanker, or maybe he’s just playing up to that now and it’s all just some elaborate in-joke between him and his team-mates.   He pulls this kind of shit all the time. The hissy fit he threw a few years ago when Arbeloa nipped in front of him to score a back post tap in was sensational. Is he really this much of a diva or is he just winding us all up? I reckon it’s a bit of both, as that one today can’t possibly be real.    Meanwhile, one of his Portugal team-mates is hoping for a call from the Reds. Bruno Fernandez (who I mentioned a couple of weeks ago after he said he likes us better than City), is reportedly wanted by Spurs to replace Eriksen but he’s holding out in the hope that Klopp makes a move.   United want him too, but what self respecting decent footballer is going to join that circus when there are better offers on the table?    They are on the brink of signing that Welsh winger from Swansea and they’re being linked with Longstaff from Newcastle. They have no idea what they’re doing. They tried the “throw massive money at superstars” approach and it bombed spectacularly. So now they’re going oppo and doing it the “sign young and hungry players from unfashionable clubs” route.   It won’t work because they don’t have the structure (or manager) in place to make it work. It’s a long way back for them fuckers.     This is just a teaser, click here to read the full article   Please note that 'the Week that Was' is only available to website subscribers. Subscriptions cost just £2 a month (you need to register first) and can be purchased here. 
    • I'll give you Alisson (bought months later obviously), where has Klopp been clear that there is no VVD purchase without Coutinho leaving? We tried to buy him in the previous summer of course, or was that just a smokescreen?
    • The important thing here is, what's his natural position? 
    • Because in the summer he wanted us to sell for the 90m or whatever it was Barca were offering at the time and we wouldn't sell at that fee. As soon as they met our asking price, Linda and John were at his house packing his bags. 
  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Now

  • Popular Contributors

×