Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Recommended Posts

Sixty-six years ago at the end of July and early August, U.S. policymakers and President Truman made fateful decisions that meant the use of two atomic bombs against Japanese cities was almost inevitable -- virtually unstoppable. Then film footage and other evidence of the true effects of the bomb were suppressed for decades. We've been living with the nuclear after-effects ever since, from Hiroshima to Fukushima.

 

Related to publication of my new book and e-book Atomic Cover-up, on that film's suppression, here's a daily record of what transpired leading up the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. It raises questions about the decision to drop the new weapon over two large cities, killing mainly women and children. (For more, including video of some of the suppressed footage, see my personal blog.) Of course this only scratches the surface of the history, and the debate, and you are encouraged to join in.

 

August 1, 1945

 

--Truman wrote a letter to his wife Bess last night talking about the atomic bomb (but without revealing it): "He [stalin] doesn't know it but I have an ace in the hole and another one showing -- so unless he has threes or two pair (and I know he has not) we are sitting all right." And today he gives a letter to Stalin, which confounds him. Earlier, Stalin had promised to declare war on Japan around August 7. Now Truman writes that more consultation is needed. Truman had pushed for the entry, writing in his diary "fini Japs" when that occurred, even without use of The Bomb. Now that he has the bomb in his "pocket" he apparently hopes to stall the Soviets.

 

--Truman has also approved statement on the use of the bomb, brought to him last night in Germany by a courier, drafted by Secretary of War Stimson and others, and ordered it released after first drop. A line near the start has been added explicitly depicting the vast city of Hiroshima as a "military base." The president, and the drafters of the statement, knew was false. An earlier draft described the city of Nagasaki as a "naval base" and nothing more. There would be no reference to radiation effects whatsoever -- it was just a vastly bigger bomb. (See my July 30 entry for more text.)

 

 

--The "Little Boy" atomic bomb is now ready for use on the island of Tinian. Under the direction of the lead pilot, Paul Tibbetts, practice runs have been completed, near Iwo Jima, and fake payloads dropped, with success. Truman's order had given the okay for the first mission later this day and it might have happened if a typhoon, of a different sort, was not approaching Japan.

 

 

August 2, 1945

 

--Early today, Paul Tibbets, pilot of the lead plane, the Enola Gay (named after his mom) on the first mission, reported to Gen. Curtis LeMay's Air Force headquarters on Guam. LeMay told him the "primary" was still Hiroshima. Bombardier Thomas Ferebee pointed on a map what the aiming point for the bomb would be -- a distinctive T-shaped bride in the center of the city. "It's the most perfect aiming I've seen in the whole damned war," Tibbets said. But the main idea was to set the bomb off over the center of the city, which rests in kind of a bowl, so that the surrounding hills would supply a "focusing effect" that would lead to added destruction and loss of life.

 

--President Truman finally left the Potsdam conference in Germany and set sail for home, having approved the message he would deliver if and when the first use of the bomb against the Japanese proved to be a success, likely before he reached America.

 

--Japanese cables and other message intercepted by the United States showed that they were still interesting in enlisting the Soviet's help in presenting peace terms but were undecided on just what to propose. The Russians, meanwhile, were just five days from declaring war on Japan.

 

August 3, 1945

 

--On board the ship Augusta steaming home for USA after Potsdam meeting, President Truman, Joint Chiefs chairman Admiral Leahy, and Secretary of State James F. Byrnes -- a strong A-bomb booster -- enjoy some poker. Byrnes aide Walter Brown notes in his diary that "President, Leahy, JFB [byrnes] agreed Japan looking for peace. (Leahy had another report from Pacific.) President afraid they will sue for peace through Russia instead of some country like Sweden."

 

Leahy would later question decision to use the bomb, writing: "[T]he use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender.... n being the first to use it, we...adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children."

 

--Our "Magic" intercepts show Japan monitoring the Soviets' military buildup in the Far East (prelude to the declaration of war in four days). Also, Japanese still searching for way to approach Molotov to pursue possible surrender terms before that happens. Another Magic intercept carried the heading, "Japanese Army's interest in peace negotiations." War Department intel analysts revealed "the first statement to appear in the traffic that the Japanese Army is interested in the effort to end the war with Soviet assistance." A segment of Prime Minister Togo's message declared: "The Premier and the leaders of the Army are now concentrating all their attention on this one point."

 

--Soviet General Vasilevskii reports to Stalin that Soviet forces ready for invasion from August 7.

 

August 4, 1945

 

 

--Hiroshima remains the primary target, with Kokura #2 and Nagasaki third.

 

-- On Tinian, Paul Tibbets, pilot of the lead plane, the Enola Gay, finally briefs others in the 509th Composite Group who will take part in the mission at3 pm. Military police seal the building. Tibbets reveals that they will drop immensely powerful bombs, but the nature of the weapons are not revealed, only that it is "something new in the history of warfare." When weaponeer Deke Parsons says, "We think it will knock out almost everything within a three-mile radius," the audience gasps. Then he tries to show a film clip of the recent Trinity test -- but the projector starts shredding the film.

 

Parsons adds, "No one knows exactly what will happen when the bomb is dropped from the air," and he distributes welder's glasses for the men to wear. But he did not relate any warnings about radioactivity or order them not to fly through the mushroom cloud.

 

--On board the ship Augusta, President Truman relaxed and played poker with one of the bomb drop's biggest booster, Secretary of State Jimmy Byrnes. Truman's order to use the bomb had simply stated that it could be used any time after August 1 so he had nothing to do but watch and wait. The order included the directive to use a second bomb, as well, without a built-in pause to gauge the results of the first and the Japanese response--even though the Japanese were expected, by Truman and others, to push surrender feelers, even without the bomb, with Russia's entry into the war on August 7.

 

Greg Mitchell's new book (also out as an e-book) is "Atomic Cover-Up: Two US Soldiers, Hiroshima & Nagasaki, and The Greatest Movie Never Made." He also co-authored, with Robert Jay Lifton, Hiroshima in America.

 

Pressing Issues

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it true that they were drinking there moulton nails because of the intense heat?

 

Can anyone translate this?

 

As to whether it was necessary, probably not, but having built it they were always going to want to show off. I think it's fair to say the second one definitely wasn't necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest davelfc

While the bombs were horrific, we're told it saved many many more lives. It's a difficult one that I've never managed to deal with really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I have read/been told via books, the deaths during the a-bomb attacks were maybe 1/8th of the lives that would have been lost had the Allies had to march on Tokyo and the other locations Japan held given the fanatical support / tyranical fear the Japanese emperor had instilled in his subjects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest davelfc
The winners always write the history books though. I'd be interested in the take of Japanese people from that time on whether they would have surrendered without it.

 

Or been allowed to, as you mentioned the US had the bomb and they wanted to use it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can anyone translate this?

 

As to whether it was necessary, probably not, but having built it they were always going to want to show off. I think it's fair to say the second one definitely wasn't necessary.

 

I was gonna pull this up, but its Simon's birthday and he's a lege. I guess he is asking, 'during a thermo-nuclear blast and while melting, did victims drink their own melting fingernails'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest davelfc

hiroshima-shadow-2.png

Such was the intensity of the explosion radiance ghostly shadows are all that remains of several unknown victims in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Demonstrating the power of a nuclear bomb wasn't just justified, it was pretty much essential. You're all of course completely right that it saved million upon millions of lives.

 

But what wasn't essential or justified in any shape or form was dropping it on a town of innocent men, women and children.

 

They could just as easily have dropped it in a sparsely inhabited area as a demonstration of power and might, with a formal warning that the next one was landing on Tokyo.

It would without doubt have had the exact same outcome; the Japanese surrender a few days later.

 

To just senselessly murder 100,000 innocent and unaware people was just absolutely fucking sick in my opinion. There's no other word for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The propaganda is certainly that it saved lives, but as mentioned, the winners write the history books. I'm skeptical personally but probably only someone who was in Japan at the time could really say, and maybe it would have to be someone quite high up in the military hierarchy. As pointed out in the article Dennis posted, there was some indication that they wanted to or at least were beginning to think about surrender anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest simon

I Was asking When th bomb went off. It was apparently so hot that the only liquid sauce was there melting nails apparently people were drinking there nails.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be interested in the take of Japanese people from that time on whether they would have surrendered without it.

 

 

These are people who flew piloted bombs. A nation of complete fanatics. "Surrender" isn't in their vocabulary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest davelfc
I Was asking When th bomb went off. It was apparently so hot that the only liquid sauce was there melting nails apparently people were drinking there nails.

 

Your nails are made of keratin, the same stuff your hair is made of.

 

Hence the term 'hair of the dog' when talking of a drink.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are people who flew piloted bombs. A nation of complete fanatics. "Surrender" isn't in their vocabulary.

 

I'm not sure if all of them had the bushido ideal completely ingrained. Some of them, yes, but an elite group within their society. When they charged the enemy seemingly without care it was because they knew the officers with swords behind them definitely would kill them.

Edited by zigackly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are people who flew piloted bombs. A nation of complete fanatics. "Surrender" isn't in their vocabulary.

 

 

Hmm joint cheifs of staff seemed to disagree with your far removed assessment:

Joint Chiefs chairman Admiral Leahy would later question decision to use the bomb, writing: "[T]he use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender.... n being the first to use it, we...adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children."

 

Oh and did i mention u r a cunt?

Edited by dennis tooth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...