Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Kate Middleton


Section_31
 Share

Recommended Posts

Why is it legal for a paparazzi to be a peeping Tom. Call me a prude but I think its wrong to invade privacy in such a manner whether the person is high profile or not, shamefull on the photographer and shamefull on the media outlet who profits from it. Okay tits.

 

Pretty fucking disgusting this episode really. Especially considering what the lad's mother had to put up with from the paparazzi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pistonbroke

No wonder the Royal family are furious, her tits are awful. Pissing myself about them getting in a tizzy, she is only another woman, get yer tits out on holiday and face the consequences yer posh slapper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it legal for a paparazzi to be a peeping Tom. Call me a prude but I think its wrong to invade privacy in such a manner whether the person is high profile or not, shamefull on the photographer and shamefull on the media outlet who profits from it. Okay tits.

 

I agree. Still, it's odd putting on the news and seeing "outrage". Where were these people and their moral indignation when sex-tapes and the mobile phones of actresses were being posted? I think we can look and that and conclude that the criticism isn't principled at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ShoePiss
Why is it legal for a paparazzi to be a peeping Tom. Call me a prude but I think its wrong to invade privacy in such a manner whether the person is high profile or not, shamefull on the photographer and shamefull on the media outlet who profits from it. Okay tits.

 

Something to do with them being outside?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Pistonbroke

In the third picture down it looks like she is looking at the photographer and smiling for the camera, dirty little inbred small titted royal bitch..***

 

***She may however be a real nice person who has worked her way into her status through hard work and not sucking royal knob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...