Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

I'm pretty convinced Trump will step down after 18 months/year once all his legal doings are in the rear view. Vance has been placed by Thiel and Musk to be their man. 

 

Think about it, why would a man as thin skinned as Trump pick a bloke to be VP who's slagged him off so much?

 

Also, many observers say his Cabinet picks look tailor made for destroying the federal government and pillars of state. 

 

Trump will be the wrecking ball, musk and the oligarchs will be the rebuilders, but they'll do it the way they want.

 

I've said before we're all part of Musk's experiment. I suspect he's not into all this anti woke right wink shite, just that it's the best and quickest way of tearing things down. Same with all the "civil war looks inevitable!" Shite he peddles in Europe and the UK.

 

The states are about to be the world's first large scale experiment in Technocracy.

I think tearing lots of shit down seems a decent start to a plan. I've revised opinion on Trump. He's a weird communicator, but he seems to want less war, less bureaucracy and more freedom on the whole. The consensus forming organisations hate him, so he's going to get beef from all quarters, but I want to see what he can do. The "new left" scares me if I'm honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Section_31 said:

Been named Time's man of the year.

 

49 minutes ago, Jairzinho said:

Bibi will be furious. Probably wondering how many more children he'd have to have massacred to get selected.

 

Luigi Mangione has been robbed.

 

17 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:

First - it is the Person of the Year.

 

 

He did make it as a finalist.

Look up his total for '09 for your answer - he won it in 2010.


Stalin & Hitler also got it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/12/2024 at 20:47, Spy Bee said:

I think tearing lots of shit down seems a decent start to a plan. I've revised opinion on Trump. He's a weird communicator, but he seems to want less war, less bureaucracy and more freedom on the whole. The consensus forming organisations hate him, so he's going to get beef from all quarters, but I want to see what he can do. The "new left" scares me if I'm honest.

No one knows wtf he actually wants. Everything he says and does is entirely transactional, he has no ideology, he only cares about what's best for him personally. Who are the new left and what are their beliefs?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, TheSire said:

No one knows wtf he actually wants. Everything he says and does is entirely transactional, he has no ideology, he only cares about what's best for him personally. Who are the new left and what are their beliefs?

I'm quite happy for people not to be ideologs. I think strong ideology is one of the biggest issues in the world today. We have too much polarisation and division and no room for evidence based approaches. 

 

I don't know what the new left is exactly, but I wouldn't say it represents the working man as it used to. It seems disinterested in personal freedoms and focused on consensus forming by almost any means. I don't actually know what they stand for anymore, other than criticising anybody who doesn't agree with them.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

Once he is inaugurated on 20 January, one of Donald Trump’s first orders of business will be pardoning people convicted or accused of crimes related to the January 6 attack, and also actions to expand oil production, the president-elect told Time.

Goodbye planet Earth. Twas nice living on you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What it looks like when you start to get into the unimportant details of the concept of a plan:

 

 

Trump told Time in an hourlong interview for its “Person of the Year” feature that his presidency wouldn’t be a failure if he failed to bring the price of groceries down.

“I’d like to bring them down. It’s hard to bring things down once they’re up. You know, it’s very hard. But I think that they will,” Trump said.

 

Nevertheless, Trump repeatedly told voters during the campaign that electing him president would cause prices to tumble.
 

“Prices will come down,” Trump said in August “You just watch: They’ll come down, and they’ll come down fast, not only with insurance, with everything.”

“We will end inflation and make America affordable again, and we’re going to get the prices down, we have to get them down,” Trump said at a rally in September “It’s too much. Groceries, cars, everything. We’re going to get the prices down.”

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, TheHowieLama said:

What it looks like when you start to get into the unimportant details of the concept of a plan:

 

 

Trump told Time in an hourlong interview for its “Person of the Year” feature that his presidency wouldn’t be a failure if he failed to bring the price of groceries down.

“I’d like to bring them down. It’s hard to bring things down once they’re up. You know, it’s very hard. But I think that they will,” Trump said.

 

Nevertheless, Trump repeatedly told voters during the campaign that electing him president would cause prices to tumble.
 

“Prices will come down,” Trump said in August “You just watch: They’ll come down, and they’ll come down fast, not only with insurance, with everything.”

“We will end inflation and make America affordable again, and we’re going to get the prices down, we have to get them down,” Trump said at a rally in September “It’s too much. Groceries, cars, everything. We’re going to get the prices down.”

 

Surely nobody believes that at the time..it's like £350m a week for the NHS by leaving the EU. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 13/12/2024 at 07:25, TheHowieLama said:

What it looks like when you start to get into the unimportant details of the concept of a plan:

 

 

Trump told Time in an hourlong interview for its “Person of the Year” feature that his presidency wouldn’t be a failure if he failed to bring the price of groceries down.

“I’d like to bring them down. It’s hard to bring things down once they’re up. You know, it’s very hard. But I think that they will,” Trump said.

 

Nevertheless, Trump repeatedly told voters during the campaign that electing him president would cause prices to tumble.
 

“Prices will come down,” Trump said in August “You just watch: They’ll come down, and they’ll come down fast, not only with insurance, with everything.”

“We will end inflation and make America affordable again, and we’re going to get the prices down, we have to get them down,” Trump said at a rally in September “It’s too much. Groceries, cars, everything. We’re going to get the prices down.”

 

 

 

As per the highlighted part, he's actually right there though, isn't he? There's no way they're coming down ever. They might not rise at the same rate anymore, but they're still gonna rise.

 

Biden and his administration didn't do enough to stop them going so high in the first place.

 

And hence they're out of office because it was the biggest factor in deciding the margin of victory in the election.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Buttery Males

 

Federal officials say they’re worried about sharing documents via email with Donald Trump’s transition team because the incoming officials are eschewing government devices, email addresses and cybersecurity support, raising fears that they could potentially expose sensitive government data.

The private emails have agency employees considering insisting on in-person meetings and document exchanges that they otherwise would have conducted electronically, according to two federal officials granted anonymity to discuss a sensitive situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/12/2024 at 19:06, Chris said:

Biden and his administration didn't do enough to stop them going so high in the first place.

 

And hence they're out of office because it was the biggest factor in deciding the margin of victory in the election.

 

 

 

What federal mechanisms do you think were not employed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...