Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Recommended Posts

I don't know much about politics, but it's just not a good idea to call people stupid. In the case of Trump voters, it's true, but it doesn't work to vote shame people. It just makes them dig in more, which is why politics are fucked up. My team vs your team, etc...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 3 Stacks said:

I don't know much about politics, but it's just not a good idea to call people stupid. In the case of Trump voters, it's true, but it doesn't work to vote shame people. It just makes them dig in more, which is why politics are fucked up. My team vs your team, etc...

 

We're all probably a bit more stupid than the generations before us due to things like social media, reality TV and dumbed down journalism. 

 

The apostrophe society shut down about five years ago.

 

There is one thing Trump did that was genius though, the whole "fake news" narrative means that people who like him no longer believe their own eyes and ears, and once that happens, for him the sky's the limit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Section_31 said:

Screenshot_20241026_144340_Chrome.jpg

He was talking about Lincoln’s other son Willie not Tad. Tad was the only child Lincoln had that made it into adulthood. He’s got the wrong name, but described everything else correctly. 
 

https://x.com/rpsagainsttrump/status/1850006438245978427?s=46&t=PwhHrO1toVvshRoo1wdiVA

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 3 Stacks said:

I don't know much about politics, but it's just not a good idea to call people stupid. In the case of Trump voters, it's true, but it doesn't work to vote shame people. It just makes them dig in more, which is why politics are fucked up. My team vs your team, etc...

Stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There’s a very good chance this podcast could finish Harris off, it’s had 16 1/2 million views in 15 hours. I’m an hour in and he’s very different to the rallies. Still some bold claims still, and stuff I can’t work out if it’s true or not.
 

However, he’s willing to sit down and talk for 3 hours. Harris ran from these types of opportunities (She knocked back going on Flagrant with Andrew Schulz while going on “Call Her Daddy”) and I think it’s going to damage her chances of winning. 
 

 


 


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly don't know what to make of the polls. You'd imagine the strategy types in the Democratic party are of higher calibre these days than the cranks in the republican machine, so when you get stories like "top level Dems feeling downbeat" there must be something a brewing there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Skidfingers McGonical said:

There’s a very good chance this podcast could finish Harris off, it’s had 16 1/2 million views in 15 hours. I’m an hour in and he’s very different to the rallies. Still some bold claims still, and stuff I can’t work out if it’s true or not.
 

However, he’s willing to sit down and talk for 3 hours. Harris ran from these types of opportunities (She knocked back going on Flagrant with Andrew Schulz while going on “Call Her Daddy”) and I think it’s going to damage her chances of winning. 
 

 


 


 

 

Call Her Daddy>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea that not going on Andrew Schulz' podcast would hurt election chances is an insane indictment of us culture.

 

What next, snubbing the guy whose only joke is taking his shirt off? Or one of the even unfunnier members of the Rogan twatentariat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pidge said:

The idea that not going on Andrew Schulz' podcast would hurt election chances is an insane indictment of us culture.

I never said that. I said her not going on Rogan will. 
 

If she was good as they say she is, she’d be able to go on anywhere and hold her own on anything Trump goes on. 

 


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If she went on Rogan show he would have been in full attack mode and fact checking everything as it was said, just talked over her and changed the subject likes he has been doing for a while when he doesn't agree with someome

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Lee909 said:

If she went on Rogan show he would have been in full attack mode and fact checking everything as it was said, just talked over her and changed the subject likes he has been doing for a while when he doesn't agree with someome


I’m not fully convinced he would have for this. Every other guest, yeah.
 

But we’ll never know now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...