Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, viRdjil said:

Without Sadiq Khan, if the people who actually sorted it out, followed the same process, then someone else would’ve approved it. There are actual rules and guidelines in all of this. 

That's not the point. You called me a liar for saying Sadiq Khan sorted it out, when he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, viRdjil said:

That Khan actively organised the baby trump blimp protest.

I said he sorted it out, which he did. Do you have a counter point to this? Can you show that he wasn't the chair of the Greater London Authority on that day, and didn't in fact give it the go ahead?

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Boss said:

I said he sorted it out, which he did. Do you have a counter point to this? Can you show that he wasn't the chair of the Greater London Authority on that day, and didn't in fact give it the go ahead?

My counterpoint is that he didn’t sort it out. He just didn’t stop the protestors. You made it up just to attack him for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, viRdjil said:

My counterpoint is that he didn’t sort it out. He just didn’t stop the protestors. You made it up just to attack him for it. 

The more you double down on your nonsense does not give it credence you know? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rico1304 said:

He had to have a reason not to authorise it. Otherwise it’d be challenged in court. There was no reason. 

How about depicting the leader of our biggest ally as a petulant baby in a diaper during a state visit. Is that not reason enough?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rico1304 said:

Ha ha ha I think you are bringing in hurt feelings into the argument.  

I don't see what attacking our biggest ally offers us when we are on the cusp of a no deal Brexit and need to secure trade arrangements with countries outside the EU. Maybe Corbyn's hoping we can strike up a trade deal with Hezbollah to keep us afloat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Boss said:

I don't see what attacking our biggest ally offers us when we are on the cusp of a no deal Brexit and need to secure trade arrangements with countries outside the EU. Maybe Corbyn's hoping we can strike up a trade deal with Hezbollah to keep us afloat. 

Free speech. People hate him and should be allowed to do what they want as long as it doesn’t break the law.  

 

You usually agree with this to be fair.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...