Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

*Shakes head* Everton again.


Fugitive

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

Also, the Mane one were he got sent off against Man City: they were both flying in at speed, totally focused on a ball that was about 4 feet off the ground.  The keeper led with his head; Mane led with his foot.  Never a Red, in my opinion.

You don't need to mitigate the circumstances, he got sent off, he was genuinely sorry for the collision. Pick ford wore it like a badge of honour. It was also funny they used the Suarez bite as well considering he got a 10 game ban for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having seen the Everton response on Twitter, I think the decision was absolutely fair enough. Coote sat in the VAR suite and reviewed all the footage of the incident, then all of the footage of Dirk Kuyt on Phil Neville, and the Gerrard two footer 16 years ago, and the Van Dijk tackle on Dries Mertens, and every other tackle made by any Liverpool player in the last 37 years and decided that Pickford's actions were kind of in the middle of all of that so no red.

 

That's how decisions are made, isn't it?

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Manny said:

Having seen the Everton response on Twitter, I think the decision was absolutely fair enough. Coote sat in the VAR suite and reviewed all the footage of the incident, then all of the footage of Dirk Kuyt on Phil Neville, and the Gerrard two footer 16 years ago, and the Van Dijk tackle on Dries Mertens, and every other tackle made by any Liverpool player in the last 37 years and decided that Pickford's actions were kind of in the middle of all of that so no red.

 

That's how decisions are made, isn't it?

They didn't check Clive Thomas? LiVARpool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doctor Troy said:

What's the summary of what they are saying?. Bet it involves Liverpool being victims.

It's karma for all the bad tackles Liverpool players have done in derbies and Van Dijk started it apparently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doctor Troy said:

They've all gone like John Fashanu in that Crazy Gang documentary where he was asked about elbowing Gary Mabbutt and fracturing his eye socket. 

 

"It was all part of the game Adam, did anyone die Adam?. No, nobody died, it was all part of the game"

imageproxy.png

Awooga!!!  What a prick he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha they're going own saying VVD set the tone with his challenged on Rodriguez in the opening seconds. This despite the fact that Rodriguez ran into VVD who simply stood his ground. They genuinely make up lies then all believe each other. Saddest fan base on the planet. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...