Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

*Shakes head* Everton again.


Fugitive

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, dockers_strike said:

Who the actual fuck walks around like they have a coat hanger stuck in their T shirt?! Would never have believed it if I hadnt seen it!

That will be that Catcherintherye from GOT on the weekend. He probably saw some 10 year old in a Liverpool top and his natural defence mechanisms kicked in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Barrington Womble said:

Here's the thing I don't quite know.. is he actually a celebrity, like a Beckham or something? To me he's a fella who had a great 12.months at Monaco and a WC and has been hovering around shite and mediocre since. Is he someone who'll raise their profile?

Thought they’re already partial to a little Columbian ?

467FD98C-4BAD-4C2A-854B-C76EEB9B42EA.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dockers_strike said:

Who the actual fuck walks around like they have a coat hanger stuck in their T shirt?! Would never have believed it if I hadnt seen it!

He was air drying his armpits. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really struggling to understand how a club with 80% + of (a really low) turnover going straight to wages , £550Mill in debt and building a stadium with shag all money is able to shell out £90 mill on 3 signings, all of whom will be on significant wages ...where in the name of Fowler are they getting the money ? Are they just taking out more loans ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Gav said:

I'm really struggling to understand how a club with 80% + of (a really low) turnover going straight to wages , £550Mill in debt and building a stadium with shag all money is able to shell out £90 mill on 3 signings, all of whom will be on significant wages ...where in the name of Fowler are they getting the money ? Are they just taking out more loans ?

Usmanov lad. *Taps nose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Gav said:

I'm really struggling to understand how a club with 80% + of (a really low) turnover going straight to wages , £550Mill in debt and building a stadium with shag all money is able to shell out £90 mill on 3 signings, all of whom will be on significant wages ...where in the name of Fowler are they getting the money ? Are they just taking out more loans ?

Well, they still have 20% or less turnover to gamble with. However, if their turnover goes up by finishing higher up the league, win a cup or qualify for Europe next season, it is a gamble that's paid off.

 

They wont be subject to UEFA's FFP for 3 years if the do manage to qualify. The PL has less stringent financial fair play rules and as we know, football authorities are easing these due to the current situation.

 

If the gamble doesnt pay off, they have richarlison as the headline transfer out and the stadium will be publically canned.

 

Usmanov or anyone else could buy into the club but equally they'd end up with usmanov or a.n.other taking up some inflated 'sponsorship' deal. After all, city have got away with that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, dockers_strike said:

Well, they still have 20% or less turnover to gamble with. However, if their turnover goes up by finishing higher up the league, win a cup or qualify for Europe next season, it is a gamble that's paid off.

 

They wont be subject to UEFA's FFP for 3 years if the do manage to qualify. The PL has less stringent financial fair play rules and as we know, football authorities are easing these due to the current situation.

 

If the gamble doesnt pay off, they have richarlison as the headline transfer out and the stadium will be publically canned.

 

Usmanov or anyone else could buy into the club but equally they'd end up with usmanov or a.n.other taking up some inflated 'sponsorship' deal. After all, city have got away with that.

 

Let's at least try keep things within the bounds of believability and credibility.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, dockers_strike said:

Well, they still have 20% or less turnover to gamble with. However, if their turnover goes up by finishing higher up the league, win a cup or qualify for Europe next season, it is a gamble that's paid off.

 

They wont be subject to UEFA's FFP for 3 years if the do manage to qualify. The PL has less stringent financial fair play rules and as we know, football authorities are easing these due to the current situation.

 

If the gamble doesnt pay off, they have richarlison as the headline transfer out and the stadium will be publically canned.

 

Usmanov or anyone else could buy into the club but equally they'd end up with usmanov or a.n.other taking up some inflated 'sponsorship' deal. After all, city have got away with that.

 

Their turnover last season was £188m with 85% of that going on wages £160m

 

Leaves next to fuck all.

 

Ours was £533m with £310m (58%) going on wages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, an tha said:

Their turnover last season was £188m with 85% of that going on wages £160m

 

Leaves next to fuck all.

 

Ours was £533m with £310m (58%) going on wages.

And wages aren't the only cost...they've made losses consistently if you take into conisderation all costs. they will make another huge loss - they can do this because 1. they don't care about FFP for another 3 years atleast and 2. moshiri is willing to spend his own cash to make up the difference in cashflow.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Salou said:

And wages aren't the only cost...they've made losses consistently if you take into conisderation all costs. they will make another huge loss - they can do this because 1. they don't care about FFP for another 3 years atleast and 2. moshiri is willing to spend his own cash to make up the difference in cashflow.  

They are heavily reliant on the TV money from league as well....it makes up 71% of what they do. 133m/188m

 

A drop in that is bad news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, an tha said:

Their turnover last season was £188m with 85% of that going on wages £160m

 

Leaves next to fuck all.

 

Ours was £533m with £310m (58%) going on wages.

Keep seeing this figure of £310m  on our wages but that's got to be wrong. Most of the 1st team are probably on less than £80k

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...