Quantcast
The definative Hodgson poll. - Page 2 - FF - Football Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
Bogman

The definative Hodgson poll.

Should Roy be replaced with immediate effect?  

339 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Roy be replaced with immediate effect?

    • Yes
      348
    • No
      20


Recommended Posts

Hmmmm, do I want the worst manager in Liverpool's history who is a mixture of incompetence and arrogance and who has us playing clueless, mind numbingly bad football, replaced immediately? or not?

 

Or do I want us to re-sign Crouch, add Wright-Phillips to the playing squad and blindly give him more time because I have these big shiny medals for objectivity and keeping to the Liverpool 'way', despite it dying ages ago and because I want to be seen by everybody as being able to be so analytical and balanced and fair?

 

Tricky one.

 

I'm clinging to one hope and one hope only...that they have identified their long term replacement who won't be available until the Summer and Steptoe would get a pay off anyway whether we sacked him today or in June and he may aswell earn his corn as get it for free.

 

If this isn't the case, then they can fuck off him any time they like. Yesterday preferably before he does any more damage, and if there are any players who actually think he's the right man for the job and like his tactics and playing style, then it's imperative that they fuck off with him. He is a disaster, a one hundred percent, unmitigated, tedious, embarrassing, depressing, anti-football disaster. He is a drowning man, he can drag some players down to the bottom with him, but not the club.

 

restrained for you PB. And some of it actually makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Embarassing, like something the "toon army" would do.

 

Also anyone who has Bombarded Henry's twitter asking him to sack Hodgson is a massive tool too.

 

Be selling balaclavas (with club crest) soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we are going to sign players in January then we need a new manager in who wont sign the likes of Poulsen and Konchesky. This is a very important time for the team. we are going backwards and we need to halt that. We need to get a top class manager in, we will go nowhere with hodgson. It was a stupid appointment and its time to fix that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've voted yes but only if there is a long term manager lined up to replace him immediately,if not then i would vote to give him until that long term target is ready to take over.

 

Getting rid of him without any well thought out strategy is like making a ships captain walk the plank when he is the only one who knows how to pilot the vessel.

 

I dont want Kenny in any capacity personally as i dont think he deserves to be temporary manager,he should be permanent or none and i think Kenny's ship has sailed,especially as hes 58 now and thats only a few years younger than Hodgson is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wonder who the 4 are a TIA poll has it at 94% and this poll isnt that far behind

 

I voted no, mainly as a protest. Think it's a pretty lame way to go about things. I don't like Roy, either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wonder who the 4 are a TIA poll has it at 94% and this poll isnt that far behind

 

I want Roy out, but I voted no because I think it's a fucking embarassment that fans are sending polls to the owners about the manager.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember the outcry when someone had a bed sheet with "enough is enough, time to go Houllier" on it at the start of 2004? Most people wanted a new manager then too but we were all embarrassed by that and this is ten times worse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or the Souness one at Spurs. That was a man who was on the front of the Scum on the Hillsborough anniversary. Those lads took a pasting.

 

Now it's cause for celebration.

 

Charles Darwen was a fucking fraud.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People are shallow fucks these days. One of the few things marking out Liverpool as different is its class. These internet campaigns are a slippery slope of cuntishness, we're heading towards Newcastle territory and fast.

 

I don't think Hodgson is up to it at all but I don't want him out now. At the end of the season when he's had chance to prove his incompetence beyond doubt. Players will leave but I don't give a fuck, we need players who will stick around for the next 5 years through a rebuilding job.

 

Just don't let Hodgson buy any new players. If we get anyone in, let Commoli do it. Hopefully Hodgson will either resign or he can sit it out for the rest of the season when he can then be dumped on his arse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I voted no (ducks flying objects) only because I want ownership to have enough time to make a proper selection for the long term, and I don't believe a caretaker manager will be any better for the team than Roy. Just more instability, plus caretaker managers have a tendency of hanging around longer than they should, all too often getting the job by default.

 

I think Hodgson should go but only when the best long term replacement becomes available.

 

No go ahead and pile on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest ShoePiss

I'm going to abstain on this, I would love Hodgson to be replaced with someone more befitting the position but this just doesn't sit well with me.

 

Ideally people like Comolli and Dalglish will be giving NESV feedback on the situation and Hodgson will be fired with a caretaker to the end of the season and a full time in place to start in the summer.

 

If NESV listen to this demand it sets a terrible precedent, they have to execute their own plan independent of this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If anything this strategy would do more harm than good, as I would say NESV would be more likely to keep Hodgson on as a result, and I wouldn't blame them. They can't be seen to be pandering to the supporters every demand via internet campaigns, when would it ever end?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want him gone and I never wanted him in the first place, but I find the whole idea and the reasons behind the poll so pathetic that I voted NO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×