Quantcast
Israel president Shimon Peres accuses Britain of pro-Arab bias - Page 42 - GF - General Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
JER

Israel president Shimon Peres accuses Britain of pro-Arab bias

Recommended Posts

Suppose he kills the member of your family , how many more can he kill before you kill him and by default the baby he is holding ? Or conversely , there are 5 of them each holding a baby and a baseball bat, how many members of your family will die before you start killing ?

Ok if we are changing the question every time. Let's bring it into a bit of reality. Hamas launches 3000 rockets at Israel in July, killing 6 people. So the chance of someone dying is 0.2%. Do I have the right to kill a child or often several children if there is a 0.2% that a member of my family will die?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So it's reckless bombardment , a totally different thing to deliberately targetting civilians

Yes, but I didn't say it was deliberately targeting civilians. Derp! Haven't you got a window to lick?

 

It's also a totally different thing to defence, and doing their best to minimise civilian casualties.

 

And, if you can differentiate between direct and oblique intent, there is still a fairly strong argument that they intend to kill civilians, as it's a virtually certain consequence of their indiscriminate bombing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So it's reckless bombardment , a totally different thing to deliberately targetting civilians

It's not reckless bombardment. Israel have been very insistent that Hamas use innocent children as shields. Which means that every time they kill children, they knew, when they fired the missile that children would die. But they did it anyway

 

It's not reckless. It's deliberate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So then , back to my first question , without a ground offensive , how can Israel ensure there are no rocket attacks , or use of the Tunnels to target civilians ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok if we are changing the question every time. Let's bring it into a bit of reality. Hamas launches 3000 rockets at Israel in July, killing 6 people. So the chance of someone dying is 0.2%. Do I have the right to kill a child or often several children if there is a 0.2% that a member of my family will die?

I wasn't deliberately changing the question , but obviously the response is going to be different if someone comes to rob than if they come to kill you or your family .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I'm not myself, I don't get the increasing fuss about being anti-Semitic.

 

For starters, it's losing it's message as you get idiots totally misusing the tag and throwing it out as a means to stifle debate about Israel.

 

And, while people being against people because of their race, ethnicity etc is dodgy and shouldn't be condoned, there appears to be an increasing amount of racism and right winged tendency amongst Israeli, and dare I say Jewish people, towards Arabs, African asylum seekers etc.

 

I'm totally against being anti anything really, but I think people should get their own houses in order before criticising others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got an original thought in your head ?

Are you going to be honest enough to reply to any post that makes you uncomfortable or will you continue to be evasive?

 

Simple fact. Israel know they are bombing innocent children and they simply do not care. There does not appear to be a human cost high enough to prevent them from their course of action.

 

Have the courage of your convictions and simply admit that you believe that it is worth killing as many innocent children as it takes to destroy Hamas

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got an original thought in your head ?

It's not me that's been brainwashed by the psychopathic Zionist occult to believe whatever is spoon-fed to me, then when you are defeated on every intellectual issue you roll out the old faithful 'anti Semite' card.

 

But you go ahead defending the mass slaughter of the innocence in Gaza by your Zionist cohorts, I just don't know how you can sleep at night.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you going to be honest enough to reply to any post that makes you uncomfortable or will you continue to be evasive?

 

Simple fact. Israel know they are bombing innocent children and they simply do not care. There does not appear to be a human cost high enough to prevent them from their course of action.

 

Have the courage of your convictions and simply admit that you believe that it is worth killing as many innocent children as it takes to destroy Hamas

I have no problem admitting that the human cost is worth it to Israel to destroy the capability of Hamas to lob rockets anytime they want and tunnel their way into Israel to cause maximum civilian casulaties , none at all.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not me that's been brainwashed by the psychopathic Zionist occult to believe whatever is spoon-fed to me, then when you are defeated on every intellectual issue you roll out the old faithful 'anti Semite' card.

 

But you go ahead defending the mass slaughter of the innocence in Gaza by your Zionist cohorts, I just don't know how you can sleep at night.

I sleep very well , knowing at least one country is doing it's best to defeat terrorists

  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • It was the gimp, I think. 
    • They’re really milking this deal. 
    • I know there’s no time for two club cunts on here but Sporting just need 4 points to clinch the Premeira. Three years ago they were known as the worst run club in world football, when their president paid supporters to attack players at the training ground. Just goes to show anything is possible and you are never as far away as you think. All done on a shoestring budget, with a rookie manager and a bunch of punk kids. Big Seb Coates finally came good.
    • The irony is that almost every other club would kill to be in the position that City and Chelsea are in.
      Everton would be top of that list, yet proudly spout about how they “called out” the breakaway six and spoke for every other club when they called for sanctions against them. The purpose of those sanctions were to allow themselves to be bumped into a position where they could “qualify” for a European place that they hadn’t actually earned as much as anything else and to claim differently is basically a lie.
      West Ham, Brighton and Crystal Palace, with rent-a-quote chairman Steve Parrish, again pontificating about how these teams should be brought to book, yet wanting to null and void last season to protect themselves against possible relegation whilst saying it was morally wrong to play on given lives were being lost. They refuse to see that in applauding City and Chelsea for breaking away, and back into the Premier League, all that is guaranteeing is they strengthen those clubs with Oligarchs or Oil States as owners to continue dominating every competition they are in, effectively taking the competitiveness away from those very same competitions!
      The ESL wasn’t handled very well in its timing or proposed implementation, but the general idea that it would possibly limit the massive money teams and allow others to challenge them was a sound one, but the blinkers were on from the time the announcement was made and the “little 14”, as opposed to the “big 6”, basically decided to hold onto what they had rather than what they might have had. It won’t go away though and they must know that, even if the current voting regulations in the Premier League give them the whip hand, and effectively a veto, for anything the top teams might want to bring in. A quick look at who has won the major prizes in European competition and domestic leagues over the past few seasons will show them why the current system needs changes to be made. They’re all hypocrites though, and will bury their collective heads in the sand while the really big boys dry bum them.
    • Talk that we have agreed terms with Konate
  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Contributors

  • top casino sites
  • new UK casino
×