Quantcast
Instant cunt identifiers - Page 224 - GF - General Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
Remmie

Instant cunt identifiers

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Doctor Troy said:

Parking in a disabled bay when you are not entitled to then getting a cob on when challenged about it.

See, that's a funny one. Not every disability is visible and even the most unlikely of people could have a disability (Brain injury, etc).

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Elite said:

See, that's a funny one. Not every disability is visible and even the most unlikely of people could have a disability (Brain injury, etc).

I think you might be preaching to the converted there mate. What shouldn't be invisible is a disabled badge on the car

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Elite said:

See, that's a funny one. Not every disability is visible and even the most unlikely of people could have a disability (Brain injury, etc).

Indeed. Just got back from McDonalds where some cunt had parked across 2 disabled bays without a badge. Then had the cheek to pipe up when asked whether they had a badge or not.

 

I've also had a row with some cunt had parked in a disabled bay in Tesco because he would only be a couple of minutes. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Elite said:

See, that's a funny one. Not every disability is visible and even the most unlikely of people could have a disability (Brain injury, etc).

Agreed I went for a shit in a disabled bogs in a wetherspoons once. (The normal bogs were half a mile away as per usual in one of them places) Anyway I thought I was fine until I sat down and got shouted at by the invisible man who was also having a shit. 

 

 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

Agreed I went for a shit in a disabled bogs in a wetherspoons once. (The normal bogs were half a mile away as per usual in one of them places) Anyway I thought I was fine until I sat down and got shouted at by the invisible man who was also having a shit. 

 

 

 

Wait, what if there’s an explanation for this shit. You tripped, fell and landed on his dick. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Captain Turdseye said:

 

Wait, what if there’s an explanation for this shit. You tripped, fell and landed on his dick. 

You gonna take advice from somebody who slapped Dee Barnes? 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sitting on a public shitter when you are invisible. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With a hard on. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, VERBAL DIARRHEA said:

People who say ‘ in my opinion ‘ when they really mean only their opinion matters.

Like a few on here.

IMO fuck you 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone who calls themselves a "free spirit". Its up there with "I'm mad me" "I'm off my head" "I'm the crazy one" and "I shag children"" 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, VERBAL DIARRHEA said:

People who say ‘ in my opinion ‘ when they really mean only their opinion matters.

Like a few on here.

IMHO is even worse.

 

If your opinion is so humble, keep it to your fucking self. 

 

[Edit - According to my predictive text, that's far from the first time I've made that point.]

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bjornebye said:

Anyone who calls themselves a "free spirit". Its up there with "I'm mad me" "I'm off my head" "I'm the crazy one" and "I shag children"" 

‘ everyone thinks i’m dead funny ‘ ‘ life of the party me ‘ ‘ don’t get me up on the karaoke whatever you do ‘ 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

IMHO is even worse.

 

If your opinion is so humble, keep it to your fucking self. 

 

[Edit - According to my predictive text, that's far from the first time I've made that point.]

Thought it was In My Honest Opinion.

 

I’d merely been outraged because I always presumed anyone saying it was a fucking liar, and now this?

 

Some people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • And the next round of objections to be raised, with Brighton once again appearing at the forefront of objections now the resumption of the league is in sight, are:   The Premier League are facing dissent from several clubs over a number of proposed rule changes for the resumption of the season. Sportsmail has learned that plans to increase the number of substitutes from three to five, to allow clubs to re-register players not named in their 25-man squads in January and to introduce a multi-ball system all have detractors. There is also unhappiness at some clubs about the Premier League's unwillingness to reconsider the use of VAR, which FIFA ruled last month could be abandoned for the rest of the campaign.   These issues are likely to lead to a fierce debate at Thursday's meeting of club executives, ahead of a formal vote on any rule changes next week. Each change would need 14 of the 20 clubs in favour to pass.  Many clubs support increasing substitutions to five due to injury fears in a congested schedule after a lengthy break, with Chelsea submitting a proposal to increase the number of substitutes on the bench from seven to nine, as revealed by Sportsmail on Monday.  But several other clubs argue making such a major change mid-season would damage the competition's integrity, while those with smaller squads feel they would be at a disadvantage.   Managers who pride themselves on their players' fitness and work ethic are also concerned at losing such advantages. Brighton coach Graham Potter went public with his opposition last month and many relegation-threatened clubs agree. Aston Villa would be obvious beneficiaries of allowing clubs to re-register players.  Goalkeeper Tom Heaton and striker Wesley were originally omitted due to knee injuries, but may now be fit to play.  Villa's relegation rivals are likely to oppose such a move, however, and could be joined by clubs who are still to face Smith's side, such as Wolves and Manchester United who are chasing European football next season. Some clubs feel the multi-ball proposal will deny players the time to recover from fatigue when the ball is out of play, which is particularly problematic with games being played in the middle of summer. The rationale is to limit lengthy stoppages when the ball is kicked into empty stands.   https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-8378005/Plans-increase-subs-five-register-players-lead-dissent-Premier-League-ranks.html
    • Dont remember too much thuggery about 1970 , but even at League level in England it was very difficult to get sent off without committing a criminal offence at that time. The strange thing was that Brazil were a beautiful side and probably the best international side ever, yet within 4 years had become a shower of mediocre cloggers in Germany.
    • Also on the old tournaments and away games in Europe, I love how the commentator sounds proper muffled, like he’s in the middle of nowhere where they barely have transmission. Makes crucial away goals seem so cool and important. i read recently that Barry Davies used to do it by phone. Does anyone know if that’s true?
    • It was the first time red and yellow cards where used, there was a particular woeful decision to allow Mexico a goal against El Salvador, apparently when the ball was placed on the centre spot for them to kick off again they kept kicking it away, and as it was close to half time the Ref decided the best course of action was to blow for half time, I wonder how that would go down today?  Didn't El Salvador and Honduras go to war after, maybe 69 so plenty of shithousery there I expect.  It's always been there, was it Portugal who kicked Pele out of the 66 tournament? 
  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Now

  • Popular Contributors

  • Football Betting Site Betway
  • Footstock
  • Online Bingo
×