Quantcast
Football opinion amnesty thread - Page 77 - FF - Football Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
RedinSweden

Football opinion amnesty thread

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, VladimirIlyich said:

He's at the wrong club if that's the case.

Imagine going through Chelsea and Man U and still being a decent human. That takes real strength of character. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Pistonbroke said:

Despite being an exceptional footballer, I hate that diving card waving cunt Messi. 

 

That's Barcelona for you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Pistonbroke said:

Despite being an exceptional footballer, I hate that diving card waving cunt Messi. 

Any excuse

 

421yUXV.gif?noredirect

 

 

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Pistonbroke said:

Shit, out of Rep. hahaha, love that. Benny Hill in reverse as the woman chases a lad with stupid run. 

I love how she's pissing herself when he tells Messi to fuck off. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Grinch said:

 

That's Barcelona for you. 

 

Most definitely.

 

Just watched the first half between Barcelona and Getafe, the latter being the better team in the first 30 minutes and should have been ahead. Then Barca have two attacks and score two goals, mostly thanks to Messi and his vision, but by fuck they like to fall over at the slightest touch or indeed when another player is just near to them attempting a tackle without touching them. That Getafe Goalkeeper looked dodgy as fuck as well. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bjornebye said:

I love how she's pissing herself when he tells Messi to fuck off. 

 

Yeah, the cheeky wee grin makes me love her more. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what the point is of having a "true #9" anymore. Just seems restrictive to the attack nowadays if you have a striker that can't interchange with others and that is the focal point of the attack where everything has to be geared toward him scoring. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We put too much focus on Manchester City. Their thread on here is busier than some match day threads when we’re playing. We’re better in every way and they’re really not worth the level of attention that we give them. More than enough of our own positive stuff to focus on. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 16/02/2020 at 03:10, 3 Stacks said:

I'm not sure what the point is of having a "true #9" anymore. Just seems restrictive to the attack nowadays if you have a striker that can't interchange with others and that is the focal point of the attack where everything has to be geared toward him scoring. 

 

Would you consider Lewandowski or Haaland to be "true #9's"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, El Rojo said:

We put too much focus on Manchester City. Their thread on here is busier than some match day threads when we’re playing. We’re better in every way and they’re really not worth the level of attention that we give them. More than enough of our own positive stuff to focus on. 


I think it’s more of the moment.

 

This is one of the biggest news stories in a very long time and it feels like a whole fuckload of schadenfreude is deserved as they’ve manipulated and perverted the system, in some cases at our expense.

 

Im going to laugh and point a fucking lot and enjoy every second of it.

 

We won’t be talking about them when their biggest rival is again Port Vale, so it’s all relative.

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Herp McDerp said:

 

Would you consider Lewandowski or Haaland to be "true #9's"?

Yes, I would say so. It's worth building your attack around them if they are that good, I guess. But I think the need for that kind of dominant central striker is lessening. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 30/01/2020 at 12:21, sir roger said:

To be fair to City ,  it is hard to keep the desperation when you have won something 4 of the last 6 years.

 

Err amnesty opinion , I thought Collymore was great and we shouldn't have got rid.

 

if Villa go down and we could do a good deal for Grealish, he could be in the same disliked by other players category as Collymore was. dragging opponents out the game for our men to walk through like Fowler did as a sort of hate figure decoy. think both have/had the raw skill to cope with being targeted in that way as a benefit to the team

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, deiseach said:

Fuck the hipster St Pauli-worshipping cult.

All the ones I've met have been hardcore punk rather than hipsters. More squat than gentrification. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People need to get over their Martin Tyler obsession. Trawling through every syllable and every inflection looking for anti-Liverpool bias is just pathetic. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Babb'sBurstNad said:

I reckon Lampard's alright, and for a young manager is doing about as well as could be expected. Tactically naive, but other than the Chelsea connection I find it a bit small time mocking him.

He's a self-confessed Tory, he should be mocked a lot fucking more!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

deiseach needs to get over peoples Martin Tyler obsession. Trawling through every syllable and every inflection of every post looking for anti-Tyler bias is just pathetic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, rotoq said:

deiseach needs to get over peoples Martin Tyler obsession. Trawling through every syllable and every inflection of every post looking for anti-Tyler bias is just pathetic.

You don't need to do too much trawling to spot his bias to be fair. He's massive stick of Manc rock with "cunt" spelt out right down the middle. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, magicrat said:

You don't need to do too much trawling to spot his bias to be fair. He's massive stick of Manc rock with "cunt" spelt out right down the middle.

Oh, he's hopelessly pro-Man Utd. I think he views the success of Man Utd and the success of Sky Sports as being one and the same. It doesn't make him anti-Liverpool though. There was nothing in his commentary after any of the goals on Monday night to suggest he hated Liverpool, yet people still went off the deep end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, deiseach said:

Oh, he's hopelessly pro-Man Utd. I think he views the success of Man Utd and the success of Sky Sports as being one and the same. It doesn't make him anti-Liverpool though. There was nothing in his commentary after any of the goals on Monday night to suggest he hated Liverpool, yet people still went off the deep end.

I seem to recall he dragged up the fact we dropped points against Utd for no apparent reason and had a pop at Salah again for not getting pen and saying "he had got plenty of those in the past". I think he is anti-Liverpool if for no better reason than its's compulsory for the two clubs to slag each other off . Don't need that from Sky's main commentator. I want to be watching the game not getting irritated and distracted by his behaviour. Drury should get his job and the cunt put out to grass. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • “He’s cumbersome and sluggish yet his pace saves him” ...Makes as much sense as a bloke pushing 60 still wearing an earring 
    • Charlie Nicholas has offered a somewhat critical view regarding the form of Virgil Van Dijk this season.

      The Sky Sports pundit believes the Dutchman has not been at the same level as he was last year.

      Football 365 via Sky Sports reported the former Arsenal striker as saying:

      "Has he been as good as last year? No. 

      “He looks cumbersome and sluggish at times, but his pace can rescue him.

      “He has pace and purpose on the ball, while having a great awareness of danger He never jumps in and rarely dives in.

      “If someone is really quick, they may have a chance, or if a player is tricky, they could send him the wrong way, but he stands up and asks them to do something, meaning the player would normally lay it off.   "He has an authority within the game."

      While thinking that Van Dijk has not been up to his elite standards this campaign, Nicholas does not doubt his ability and still believes he should be in the Premier League team of the season.  

      “Is he as good as what people think?   "Yes, he is that good. People are scared to test him. Little balls in behind can make him vulnerable, but who isn’t? 

      “He is a leader and has such a response of being on the ball, whether it be 10 yards or 60.   "He is good in the air both in attack and defence, he has to be in the team of the season.”




       
      View full article
    • Isn't it just Johnny H? 
    • OK. Let's try the debating thing.   The first point about "sound economic judgement" is demonstrable bullshit.  In 2010 when David Cameron's coke-addled fag (in the public school sense of the word) launched a decade of cuts to jobs, pay, pensions, services and benefits he did so "to deal decisively with our country's record debts". https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/jun/22/emergency-budget-full-speech-text   After 9 years of Tory rule, the National Debt had increased by £760 billion. https://www.statista.com/statistics/281761/national-debt-of-the-united-kingdom-uk/   By the Tories' own measure, their handling of the economy has been a calamitous failure.   The second point about "realistic social responsibility" is baffling. What the fuck does it mean? I would argue that, realistically, a wealthy country has a social responsibility to provide decent jobs, decent and sufficient housing, proper pensions, investment in technologies to minimise and mitigate climate change, efficient public services, free access to good quality education and  - of course  - universal, comprehensive healthcare, free at the point of use. Presumably, based on their track record, Tories would have a significantly different interpretation of that phrase.   If @CurtisJones hasn't skulked off to lurk for a couple more years, like some neoliberal cicada, maybe he could clarify what he means by "realistic social responsibility".
  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Contributors

  • Football Betting Site Betway
  • Online Bingo
×