Camara, Titi - A-D - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Camara, Titi

Recommended Posts


TITI CAMARA 1999-2000


by Dave Usher

Date of Birth - 11/07/72

Nationality - Guinean

Position - Striker

Games - 37

Goals - 10

Club Hons (Lpool) - None

Intnl Hons - Guinea Caps

Other Clubs - St Ettiene, Lens, Marseille, West Ham, Al Ittihad, Al Saïliya (S-Arabia), Amiens SC


They say it's better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all, and we certainly loved Titi Camara. One of the most popular players to pull on the red shirt in recent memory, Titi should have enjoyed a long and lasting relationship with Liverpool Football Club and its fans, but instead, he was sold to West Ham after a little over a year, sold for a paltry £2m.


But just where did it all go wrong? Basically, Gerard Houllier did not have the same high opinion of Camara that the fans had, and he only ever saw him as a back up for Michael Owen and Robbie Fowler. As soon as Emile Heskey arrived at the club, Titi's days were numbered.


The decision to drop Titi for the run in to the 99/00 season did not go down well with the majority of reds fans, and many feel that Titi's exclusion from the side cost the club a place in the champions league. Heskey was struggling to settle into his new surroundings, and Owen and Fowler were struggling for fitness, yet Titi was kept on the outside looking in.


That was where the relationship with Titi and LFC started to deteriorate, and Titi's agent was causing a lot of problems behind the scenes, and appeared to be trying to set up a move to Celtic. That, combined with Titi's lax approach to training seemed to convince Houllier that the popular Guinean was surplus to requirements, and he was completely frozen out of the first team picture for the start of the 00/01 season.


He only made the substitutes bench once, for the UEFA Cup tie with Slovan Liberec, and that game proved to be the final insult for Camara, as Houllier humiliated the African by forcing him to run up and down the touchline for the entire second half, yet refused to bring him on in a game that was crying out for his unpredictable talents. The fans chanted his name, but the more they called for Titi, the more Houllier dug his heels in, and the next day, Camara handed in a transfer request.


Titi will be remembered for his wonderful skill and exciting runs, as well as some truly stunning goals. Most of all though, he will go down in Anfield folklore for a goal against West Ham at Anfield, just hours after the tragic death of his father. When Camara handed in his transfer request, Houllier accused him of a lack of commitment to LFC, but anyone who was at Anfield on that emotional night in Octber 1999, knows that Titi Camara's commitment to Liverpool Football Club is unquestioned.


It was great while it lasted, and he'll always be a hero to many. Thanks for the memories Titi.




More info on Titi Camara:


++ / LFChistory.net -- Past Present Future

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah.   Klopp made a good point in his post match presser. He asked the room if anybody thought it was a penalty and 1 or 2 said they did (probably local Naples reporters). But the fact a couple did means it wasn’t a clear & obvious error.    However, it certainly wasn’t a clear cut penalty either. Personally, I think if it was referred he’d have overturned it as he didn’t stand for any of their shit all night - and IMO it should have been referred.   I’ve said before I like VAR, or at least the idea of it, but the implementation isn’t as expected & it’s gotten worse since the World Cup 18 months ago (although not perfect, it was actually decent in Russia IMO).    Anyway, I’m over it. Treat it as a minor inconvenience / annoyance and back us to win the next 4.
    • Virgil Van Dijk has played down the impact of Liverpool’s 2-0 defeat at the hands of Napoli in their Champions League clash on Tuesday evening.

      The Reds were looking good for a well earned point against the Italian side before a debatable penalty and a late strike in injury time by Fernando Llorente was enough to see the home side claim the three points.

      But Van Dijk said the defeat which was only their second in a competitive fixture this campaign, was not a cause for worry.

      The Liverpool Echo reported the defender as saying:

      “It didn’t feel like a wake-up call, I think both sides were focused fully on the game, It felt like it was going to be a draw, and then the penalty changed everything in the game. 

      “It shouldn’t be a wake-up call - we have been performing since the start of the season outstanding, and so there is no reason to panic.

      “And in the game as well, we played well, we put them under pressure, we created opportunities on the break. 

      “So there were a lot of positive things , the only thing not positive was the result.”  

      Van Dijk believed the final score was not a true reflection of the overall contest and the performance was full of merit.

      He also believed the penalty awarded against Andy Robertson completely changed the outcome of the game.

      “I think 2-0 didn’t really reflect the game.

      “I think we were much better (than last season) we lost it (again), but we played well, we had opportunities on the break, we played in some moments.

      “We felt comfortable, then they got the penalty which changed the game.”

      “Lots of times you can say that it felt a little bit harsh, but the ref made the decision so you have to accept it.

      “Everyone knows how tough it is to come here and beat them, first of all, but also to play well against them. 

      “But you could see we put them under a lot of pressure to try and win the ball quite a lot high up the pitch, and try to break on them.”

      The Reds will look to return to winning ways when they play Chelsea at Stanford Bridge on Sunday afternoon.
      View full article
    • Excellent report as per usual Dave,I agree with you on the VAR.... but what if as was suggested (by someone!)that captains are given 3 chances to question the decision (tennis & cricket)... works fine there & doesn't take long & everyone knows what the fuck is happening at least! 
    • He was decent here, but we replaced him with a better player in Fabinho. 
    • Once Everton touches you, you're better off asking a friend to make it quick.
  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Contributors