Carter, Jimmy - A-D - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Carter, Jimmy

Recommended Posts




by Dave Usher

Date of Birth - 09/11/65

Nationality - English

Position - Winger

Games - 8

Goals - 0

Club Hons (Lpool) - None

Intnl Hons - None

Other Clubs - Crystal Palace, QPR, Millwall, Arsenal, Oxford, Portsmouth


The signing of Jimmy Carter was one of Kenny Dalglish's final, and strangest, signings as Liverpool boss. Carter had not exactly set the world alight at Millwall, but Dalglish saw something in the right winger which persuaded him to part with £800,000 to take him to Anfield in January 1991.


A player who relied considerably on his electric pace, he seemed completely out of his depth whenever he pulled on the red shirt. At Millwall he was known for being very fleet of foot and skillful, and his crossing was one of the Lions' main attacking weapons.


Yet Liverpool fans saw none of those qualities, as Carter struggled to adapt to the higher expectation levels at Anfield, and the subsequent pressure that brings with it. Lacking in confidence, Carter was the proverbial 'headless chicken.'


He was quick, but his strange running style hardly inspired confidence. When in full flow he resembled a duck with a rocket up its arse, and unfortunately he played like one.


Poor old Jimmy is most remembered for a game at Stamford Bridge when Graeme Souness' reign was in its infancy. Souness sent Carter on as a substitute, had a look at him for a few minutes, decided that he didn't like what he saw, and promptly hauled him off.


He wasn't seen again in a Liverpool shirt, and the reds were delighted to offload him to Arsenal for £500,000 in October. He barely featured for them either, which begs the question, how much cash did George Graham get from that deal!


More info on Jimmy Carter:


++ / LFChistory.net -- Past Present Future

  • Upvote 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah.   Klopp made a good point in his post match presser. He asked the room if anybody thought it was a penalty and 1 or 2 said they did (probably local Naples reporters). But the fact a couple did means it wasn’t a clear & obvious error.    However, it certainly wasn’t a clear cut penalty either. Personally, I think if it was referred he’d have overturned it as he didn’t stand for any of their shit all night - and IMO it should have been referred.   I’ve said before I like VAR, or at least the idea of it, but the implementation isn’t as expected & it’s gotten worse since the World Cup 18 months ago (although not perfect, it was actually decent in Russia IMO).    Anyway, I’m over it. Treat it as a minor inconvenience / annoyance and back us to win the next 4.
    • Virgil Van Dijk has played down the impact of Liverpool’s 2-0 defeat at the hands of Napoli in their Champions League clash on Tuesday evening.

      The Reds were looking good for a well earned point against the Italian side before a debatable penalty and a late strike in injury time by Fernando Llorente was enough to see the home side claim the three points.

      But Van Dijk said the defeat which was only their second in a competitive fixture this campaign, was not a cause for worry.

      The Liverpool Echo reported the defender as saying:

      “It didn’t feel like a wake-up call, I think both sides were focused fully on the game, It felt like it was going to be a draw, and then the penalty changed everything in the game. 

      “It shouldn’t be a wake-up call - we have been performing since the start of the season outstanding, and so there is no reason to panic.

      “And in the game as well, we played well, we put them under pressure, we created opportunities on the break. 

      “So there were a lot of positive things , the only thing not positive was the result.”  

      Van Dijk believed the final score was not a true reflection of the overall contest and the performance was full of merit.

      He also believed the penalty awarded against Andy Robertson completely changed the outcome of the game.

      “I think 2-0 didn’t really reflect the game.

      “I think we were much better (than last season) we lost it (again), but we played well, we had opportunities on the break, we played in some moments.

      “We felt comfortable, then they got the penalty which changed the game.”

      “Lots of times you can say that it felt a little bit harsh, but the ref made the decision so you have to accept it.

      “Everyone knows how tough it is to come here and beat them, first of all, but also to play well against them. 

      “But you could see we put them under a lot of pressure to try and win the ball quite a lot high up the pitch, and try to break on them.”

      The Reds will look to return to winning ways when they play Chelsea at Stanford Bridge on Sunday afternoon.
      View full article
    • Excellent report as per usual Dave,I agree with you on the VAR.... but what if as was suggested (by someone!)that captains are given 3 chances to question the decision (tennis & cricket)... works fine there & doesn't take long & everyone knows what the fuck is happening at least! 
    • He was decent here, but we replaced him with a better player in Fabinho. 
    • Once Everton touches you, you're better off asking a friend to make it quick.
  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Contributors