Quantcast
Questiontime - GF - General Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Probably my favourite programme on terrestrial TV these days, it was ace tonight, Shami Chakrabarti was going apeshit about Milliband's soiled-pants performance in the whole US Intelligence/torture affair.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was quite looking forward to the arguements between the worst of Labour (Hoon) vs the worst of the Tories (May) vs that buffoon Farage. Watched a few minutes, but as usual, it was a cringeworthy comment from the floor that made me switch over to Newsnight.

 

Sorry to hijack, but Newsnight kept making me laugh. Ludicrous (I've never been able to spell that) graphics comparing the economy to a smoking gun - again and again and again. They love their shit graphics do BBC political division - it's become a parody of The Day Today, if that's possible. Then a wonderfully orange Labour croney woman - she'll be getting the cancer soon if se doesn't watch out.

 

Best of all, though, was some hedge fund manager trying to justify why "if we don't pay salaries of £1m, all the talanted people will bugger off elsewhere." He actually quoted that figure, saying that we'll never get the best people to stay in this country and run the banks if we don't pay them that amount, or they'll go and work in other industries. He had a smirk all over his features all the time he was talking. Vince Cable (a bit of a cock, but he seriously knows his shit) was opposite him, and basically asked him f he worried that the best financial brains would go and work in (eg) the public sector because the money in finance wasn't good enough; the hedge fund bloke said no, they'd all go abroad. To which Wark just said that as the yanks have imposed a salary cap now and salarres are tumbling everywhere else too, there'd be nowhere for them to go and earn that kind of money. That shut the smug cunt up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was quite looking forward to the arguements between the worst of Labour (Hoon) vs the worst of the Tories (May) vs that buffoon Farage. Watched a few minutes, but as usual, it was a cringeworthy comment from the floor that made me switch over to Newsnight.

 

Sorry to hijack, but Newsnight kept making me laugh. Ludicrous (I've never been able to spell that) graphics comparing the economy to a smoking gun - again and again and again. They love their shit graphics do BBC political division - it's become a parody of The Day Today, if that's possible. Then a wonderfully orange Labour croney woman - she'll be getting the cancer soon if se doesn't watch out.

 

Best of all, though, was some hedge fund manager trying to justify why "if we don't pay salaries of £1m, all the talanted people will bugger off elsewhere." He actually quoted that figure, saying that we'll never get the best people to stay in this country and run the banks if we don't pay them that amount, or they'll go and work in other industries. He had a smirk all over his features all the time he was talking. Vince Cable (a bit of a cock, but he seriously knows his shit) was opposite him, and basically asked him f he worried that the best financial brains would go and work in (eg) the public sector because the money in finance wasn't good enough; the hedge fund bloke said no, they'd all go abroad. To which Wark just said that as the yanks have imposed a salary cap now and salarres are tumbling everywhere else too, there'd be nowhere for them to go and earn that kind of money. That shut the smug cunt up.

 

"To which Wark just said that as the yanks have imposed a salary cap now and salarres are tumbling everywhere else too, there'd be nowhere for them to go and earn that kind of money"

In which case there is no need for the government to get involved as the market will do it anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bastard- forgot it was on last night. I'll have to give it a go on the iplayer.

 

It makes me laugh how they have a panel full of politicians, academics and journalists and then have some random no-mark on the end.

 

"Welcome to Question Time from Bath. In the audience tonight is the Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, Shadow Chancellor George Osborne, political commentator Nick Cohen, journalist Johann Hari and popular childrens entertainer Barry Chuckle."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Best of all, though, was some hedge fund manager trying to justify why "if we don't pay salaries of £1m, all the talanted people will bugger off elsewhere."

 

 

Ah yes, all those immensely talented people who've brought the country to the brink of financial ruin - whatever would we do without them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Government said they'd only agree to send someone on tonight if Alastair Campbell was removed from the panel, Dimbleby goes "Downing Street doesn't pick our guests, we do"

 

Fucking shithouse tactic in a week when they've announced their policies in the Queen's Speech and slashed the budget by £6.25bn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was David Laws that was meant to be on apparently. Bad shithouse.

 

As tough as opponent as Campbell might be if you can't get him to pipe down, given the skeletons in his closet, then you're in bad shape.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was actually fairly compelling viewing tonight. I'd recommend a iplayer viewing if you missed it. That libdem women was awful though - she came across with the air of a particularly officious and strident senior member of the village fete committee who's crumbly oatcake biscuits weren't getting a look in. When she wasn't spluttering, her speaking voice was quite the most irritating fucking thing I've heard for ages.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It was David Laws that was meant to be on apparently. Bad shithouse.

 

As tough as opponent as Campbell might be if you can't get him to pipe down, given the skeletons in his closet, then you're in bad shape.

 

Would it be appropriate to mention what a little shithouse Osbourne proved himself to be by not turning up to the House for questions about his slash n' burn?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Would it be appropriate to mention what a little shithouse Osbourne proved himself to be by not turning up to the House for questions about his slash n' burn?

 

Didn't know about that. Good to see from the other day that the coalition is sticking to the idea Labour had about anouncing things using press conferences and not the house though; it'd be a shame if that stopped. Especially for little things like £6bn of cuts.

 

I was watching some clips from the commons the other day and Gideon was sat there with his mouth open like a particularly gormless trout. He didn't shut it for about half a minute, I actually shouted at him, that's how bad it was. He's not trying particularly hard to shrug of the fact he's out of his depth. I don't think it makes me a snob for wanting someone who got a first in economics (or even studied it a bit) to sort out economic trouble.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Numero Veinticinco
I don't blame anyone for not wanting to share a platform with the mass murderer Alastair Campbell.

 

You seem to have no problem with Clegg sharing a platform with Cameron who voted for the same wars and would have done exactly the same thing, had he been in charge at the time.

 

Not that I deny the wrongdoings of many. I'm as anti the Iraq and Afghanistan wars as it is possible to be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't blame anyone for not wanting to share a platform with the mass murderer Alastair Campbell.

 

Are you saying he should have shared a platform with Albert Pierrepoint?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You seem to have no problem with Clegg sharing a platform with Cameron who voted for the same wars and would have done exactly the same thing, had he been in charge at the time.

 

 

I can forgive someone for being in favour of the war, I can't forgive them for maliciously deceiving people into supporting it. David Cameron wasn't responsible for the Iraq dossier, there is far less blood on his hands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It was actually fairly compelling viewing tonight. I'd recommend a iplayer viewing if you missed it. That libdem women was awful though - she came across with the air of a particularly officious and strident senior member of the village fete committee who's crumbly oatcake biscuits weren't getting a look in. When she wasn't spluttering, her speaking voice was quite the most irritating fucking thing I've heard for ages.

 

It's going to get pretty tedious seeing the Lib Dems and Tories side by side on this show seeing as they're still putting on a united front about pretty much everything and nodding their heads at the same time. I think the Libs should enjoy their taste of power while they can, because they're going to get wiped out at the next election - I think a lot of people will see them as a scapegoat and will be able to attack them in their Labour/Lib Dem leaning constintuencies the way they very really get the chance to attack the Tories.

 

The idea that Downing Street is dictating who will and won't go on Questiontime, and coming only weeks after they change the rules on the disolution of parliament, and as Stu said - they're still issuing policy through the press - it's kind of ironic that they're painting themselves as repealers of Labour's anti-democratic moves. If anything, Labour has laid the groundwork for the kind of setup the Tories will thrive in.

 

Expect the BBC to come under budget assault in the next few months.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can forgive someone for being in favour of the war, I can't forgive them for maliciously deceiving people into supporting it. David Cameron wasn't responsible for the Iraq dossier, there is far less blood on his hands.

 

That has to be one of the weakest arguments you have put forward in the past month!

 

'Yeah I know he has blood on his hands, but not as much as him'!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't blame anyone for not wanting to share a platform with the mass murderer Alastair Campbell.

 

Pity that's got nothing to do with why they bottled it though, eh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't blame anyone for not wanting to share a platform with the mass murderer Alastair Campbell.

 

This is a weak defence of a bad decision. Your party is in government now and is accountable to every free member of society however objectionable their views or actions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • Some people put out a depleted XI against Shrewsbury, others put out a depleted XI against Real Madrid.
    • Jürgen Klopp has a strong ally in his decision to give his senior players a week off during the scheduled winter break rather than play in the fourth round replay against Shrewsbury.

      Klopp has received some criticism in some quarters, but Leicester manager Brendan Rodgers spoke strongly in favour of the German. 

      The Echo reported the Northern Irishman as saying:

      “He's well within his rights to do that.

      “That's why you have your first-team squad, you have reserve players and why you have youth players.

      "I said a number of weeks ago that the load that is put on players and the pressure that some players have over the December, Christmas period, this week was designed (to help that).

      “It's not really you would say a break, but it's something at least for the players to have and to go away and recover a little bit.

      "To then organise the replays within that was ridiculous.

      Rodgers believes managers should have every right to pick their team because player welfare should be at the forefront of everyone’s minds.

      “Jurgen is within his rights to pick whatever team he wants to pick.   "If he's going to decide to rest all his players for the benefit of the club, because that's who he is employed by, then that's what he does and he has every right to do that."  

      Importantly, Gini Wijnaldum is also right behind his manager’s actions and spoke about how important this break is for a player. 

      'Since I've been in the Premier League I've played the season without a winter break but I also know, before I came to the Premier League, how good it is for a player to have some rest.

      'After the rest you can go again. Your body is more rested than if you keep on going, so that's a good thing.

      “As a player you want to be involved in every game there is but you also have to deal with your body and sometimes your body just says that it is not the right choice to do.

      'You just have to see how the situation is but if the manager decides that the younger players are going to play the game then we should accept it.'

      Former Manchester United and England defender Rio Ferdinand understood the reasoning, but believed that Klopp should be on the touchline for the contest.

      "When you are a successful team, you are fighting on all fronts and Liverpool are doing that. I totally understand you have to shuffle your pack.

      “He wants to make sure his squad remains fresh and if he thinks he can get through to the next round with a younger team, then so be it. 

      “It's a great experience for those players.

      “The only issue I have and he's taking a liberty in some ways, is if he's not actually going to be in the dugout.
        “That's where I draw the line. I think the manager should be in the dugout for every game.   'It doesn't matter whether he's putting out a depleted squad or not."








       
      View full article
    • I think our best possible "alternative" side should play. I reckon the "alternative" senior players should want to play - especially the ones who failed to impress yesterday. And I'd love it if Jurgen managed the game, and explained the reason for his turnaround: that his dedication and integrity in leading the club - and respecting paying fans - overrode his disillusionment with the convenient sense of propriety and inconsistency displayed by the nation's leading football bodies. That, to me, would be making an even bigger stand than the one he's currently planning on making.    
    • If only we'd got the job done yesterday... I'd be writing this in a non-existent thread.
  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Contributors

×