Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Police are cunts


Malarkey
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Rico1304 said:

Can’t mate, it’s important.  
 

Bit weird seeing people pontificating on this thread and throwing women under the bus on another. Consistency kids. 

If you weren't an obsessed fucking weirdo, you'd know that nobody is "throwing women under the bus".

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not really buying the overcome with remorse thing aswell tbh.

He planned it,tried to cover his tracks and then carried on with his life.

If he was that shattered with guilt he would have topped himself after it.

Also to me you are normally remorseful over a minute of stupidity, not when you actually plan something, knowing full well the consequences. 

The cunt is remorseful because he got caught.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

I'm not really buying the overcome with remorse thing aswell tbh.

He planned it,tried to cover his tracks and then carried on with his life.

If he was that shattered with guilt he would have topped himself after it.

Also to me you are normally remorseful over a minute of stupidity, not when you actually plan something, knowing full well the consequences. 

The cunt is remorseful because he got caught.

I doubt he’s even that. The cunt has said he’s remorseful because saying so might’ve slightly lessened the number of days he’s going to have to spend isolated in a prison cell, and no more than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 30/09/2021 at 12:56, rb14 said:

Around a quarter of all UK homicide victims are women. Is that more or less remarkable than almost 75% comprising men?

How many of those men were killed by a male they knew? By a male in a position of power?  How many were in a domestic violence situation. It's comparing chalk and cheese. The murder of 75% whilst no less important is not female on male violence. 

 

On 30/09/2021 at 17:46, Captain Howdy said:

Police getting slaughtered over this but I don’t see why if I’m honest, the freak show who killed this poor girl is clearly a grotesque one-off, has anything like this ever even happened before? Why would confidence in them be undermined over this? was confidence in the NHS undermined because of the likes of Shipman and Allitt? Of course not.

It does, regularly - whilst it doesn't often end in murder, that abuse of power on women happens regularly. 

 

Re Allitt - I've had kids in and out of hospital wired up to machines a fair bit, post Allitt. Not once do i not ask what they're administering, why, who authorised it and can i see the prescription that should be with them. But then i'm incredibly confident with my albeit limited medical knowledge. They're my kids and ultimately i have to act in their best interest.  

 

On 30/09/2021 at 19:01, Captain Howdy said:

Come on mate let’s get real, that will be a nickname for just about somebody in every workplace and pub in the country, it’s used for all manner of reasons, nobody actually imagines it to be true. 

FUCK OFF right there. No seriously, keep on fucking off after that. The fact that this went with so little comment on the thread has pissed me off immensely. JUST FUCKING NO. 

 

I don't know one woman whom i'd call the rapist, the perv, the flasher, the groomer and on and on. NOT ONE. 

 

This isn't something light hearted to have a laugh about, this isn't something that should even be a comment. It's like that uncle peado of the family - you fucking out them, because there is truth in it somewhere, it may not be rape, it might be that he forced himself a bit too far, whatever, it's violence against women. If a person is known to have been given that name it should be called out challenged and put right. It's certainly no badge of honour. 

 

23 hours ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

When Ash Sarkar agrees with Jess Phillips, you know something has gone badly wrong.

 

IMG_20211001_143803.jpg

 

I'm a gobby cow, i'll challenge anyone but this is it, they have the power. I work where i need a DBS, do i explain why resisting arrest may halt my future career by giving me a criminal record. Exactly what was she to do? She had no choice. 

19 hours ago, Mudface said:

Marina Hyde-

 

 

 

That first line again. 

17 hours ago, Rico1304 said:

It’s no wonder women want spaces where there are no men.  Or the presence of a man is immediately challenged and alarm is raised. 

Oh do fuck off. Safe spaces isn't and shouldn't be about having no men, it's about being safe around men. That starts with you. That starts with all of you.

 

It's how you behave, and it's not by thinking - i'm not raping and murdering all the women out there, its about body language, mannerisms and ultimately not being a fucking knob and thinking it's normal to have people in your workplace/pub whatever with a nickname of the rapist. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I can honestly say I know more women that have been raped than have not. It doesn't get reported, mentally you push back - oh, well, i drank a bit much there, oh well it was my own fault for agreeing to go on that walking date in the evening when it was getting dark, oh shit, i shouldn't have took that subway..., i shouldn't have had those earphones in, i should have fought harder, i should have screamed.... Most women i know fought the long game, i'll do what he says to survive. 

 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, melons said:

 

This isn't something light hearted to have a laugh about, this isn't something that should even be a comment. It's like that uncle peado of the family - you fucking out them, because there is truth in it somewhere, it may not be rape, it might be that he forced himself a bit too far, whatever, it's violence against women. If a person is known to have been given that name it should be called out challenged and put right. It's certainly no badge of honour. 

 

 

You’ll have to point out the bit where I said it was light hearted and something to have a laugh about, I merely pointed out a fact and that the person or persons giving these nicknames won’t really believe the person to be those things, that was my point, nothing else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Captain Howdy said:

You’ll have to point out the bit where I said it was light hearted and something to have a laugh about, I merely pointed out a fact and that the person or persons giving these nicknames won’t really believe the person to be those things, that was my point, nothing else.

But they will believe them to be a bit shadier than most men in their attitudes and behaviour towards women. Maybe we shouldn't be so accepting of those attitudes and behaviours: they're not harmless and they're not fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

But they will believe them to be a bit shadier than most men in their attitudes and behaviour towards women. Maybe we shouldn't be so accepting of those attitudes and behaviours: they're not harmless and they're not fun.

Again, I never said they were, my point was in relation to the post by Anubis, I would have thought the point I was making was obvious, that these names are extremely common and nobody or certainly the vast majority would not think that the recipients of these names are capable of atrocities. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Captain Howdy said:

You’ll have to point out the bit where I said it was light hearted and something to have a laugh about, I merely pointed out a fact and that the person or persons giving these nicknames won’t really believe the person to be those things, that was my point, nothing else.

 Come on mate let’s get real, that will be a nickname for just about somebody in every workplace and pub in the country, it’s used for all manner of reasons, nobody actually imagines it to be true. 

 

That, that right there. Why wouldn't they believe it to be true? I'd totally believe it. 

If someone said to me, thats James the piss head.... I'd totally assume he was a piss head or T total, it would go one of 2 ways. No middle ground. If someone said to me, thats Stuey the rapist over there, i would straight away ask how they'd got that name, and I'd point out how stupidly offensive it is if it was some nuckle dragging workplace joke. It's not funny, nor would it ever be. 

Edit - they're not common, these are not things that are common in any work place i've never been and by thinking and assuming they're common you're doing both the act and the severity of it no favours. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Captain Howdy said:

Again, I never said they were, my point was in relation to the post by Anubis, I would have thought the point I was making was obvious, that these names are extremely common and nobody or certainly the vast majority would not think that the recipients of these names are capable of atrocities. Remember the popular poster on here who for years who went by the name of Rapey Hugh? I mean that’s just one example.

There's a key point in that Marina Hyde article where she mentions a continuum of male behaviour towards women. The rapists and murderers are obviously at the extreme end, but the creepy, sleazy bastards we give those nicknames to (and we recognise that they are creepy, sleazy bastards, hence the nicknames) are edging towards that end of the continuum. We'd do well to call out their creepy, sleazy behaviour, rather than joke about it and wait to see how far it goes.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, melons said:

 Come on mate let’s get real, that will be a nickname for just about somebody in every workplace and pub in the country, it’s used for all manner of reasons, nobody actually imagines it to be true. 

 

That, that right there. Why wouldn't they believe it to be true? I'd totally believe it. 

If someone said to me, thats James the piss head.... I'd totally assume he was a piss head or T total, it would go one of 2 ways. No middle ground. If someone said to me, thats Stuey the rapist over there, i would straight away ask how they'd got that name, and I'd point out how stupidly offensive it is if it was some nuckle dragging workplace joke. It's not funny, nor would it ever be. 

Bit of a difference between a piss head and a rapist like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

There's a key point in that Marina Hyde article where she mentions a continuum of male behaviour towards women. The rapists and murderers are obviously at the extreme end, but the creepy, sleazy bastards we give those nicknames to (and we recognise that they are creepy, sleazy bastards, hence the nicknames) are edging towards that end of the continuum. We'd do well to call out their creepy, sleazy behaviour, rather than joke about it and wait to see how far it goes.

Yeah but I don’t joke about it and see where it goes,  you know what I honestly can’t be arsed going around in circles. My post was in relation to the post raised by Anubis which I ( probably incorrectly) assumed he was suggesting that his colleagues should have known this would happen because of his nickname, that’s it, that was all. I’ve nothing more to add

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Captain Howdy said:

Bit of a difference between a piss head and a rapist like.

And thats my argument - you would accept that someone is a pisshead, they're not going out (in general) committing violent acts on women (or men). It's also acceptable that many people like a drink and it doesn't on the whole harm anyone but their own liver and bank balance.

 

For someone to have a nickname .... the rapist - they got it from somewhere and for their colleagues to accept that this nickname is appropriate is even worse, not just by perpetuating and reinforcing the nickname, but actually the whole fucking inappropriateness of it if there was no substance to it or not acting on it if there was.  

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Bruce Spanner said:


That’s nothing, they recommended flagging a  passing bus down earlier if you felt distressed.

 

A complete clusterfuck of messaging which does nothing to dispel the idea that they’re out of date and touch dinosaurs.

Being out of date is one thing, but touching dinosaurs is beyond the pale

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

There's a key point in that Marina Hyde article where she mentions a continuum of male behaviour towards women. The rapists and murderers are obviously at the extreme end, but the creepy, sleazy bastards we give those nicknames to (and we recognise that they are creepy, sleazy bastards, hence the nicknames) are edging towards that end of the continuum. We'd do well to call out their creepy, sleazy behaviour, rather than joke about it and wait to see how far it goes.

As an aside what are your views on the ( let’s face it porn) threads on here. Do you post on them? Do you think they are part of the problem? I’d imagine you do. What is your opinion of Alan Sex?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Captain Howdy said:

You’ll have to point out the bit where I said it was light hearted and something to have a laugh about, I merely pointed out a fact and that the person or persons giving these nicknames won’t really believe the person to be those things, that was my point, nothing else.

I'll.say it again as I said it before.

I've never worked in an work environment where someone was affectionately called a rapist.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...