Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Shannon Mathews' Mother and Uncle Found Guilty


Section_31
 Share

Recommended Posts

Does amuse me how the working class are depicted in these things, although I'm not denying Matthews for one second was a scummer, but even so there's something of a 'day out at the zoo' feel about these shows, as is the likes of the Jeremy Kyle Show. Meanwhile, Nigella Lawson snorts coke while her kids are in bed and David Cameron leaves his daughter in the boozer. And as for the McCalister family, bloody hell.

You have a more generous sense of humour than me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does amuse me how the working class are depicted in these things, although I'm not denying Matthews for one second was a scummer, but even so there's something of a 'day out at the zoo' feel about these shows, as is the likes of the Jeremy Kyle Show. Meanwhile, Nigella Lawson snorts coke while her kids are in bed and David Cameron leaves his daughter in the boozer. And as for the McCalister family, bloody hell.

Slightly torn with this as I take your point but to be quite frank I don't know what aspect of that council estate depictaction you could question. In almost all my experience growing up around estates like that with some none working families that is EXACTLY what it was like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still think it's class how Mike Donovan changed his name by deed poll because he was a fan of V. I did genuine ask about doing that when I was six. My mum rejected the notion of 'Ham Tyler' instantly.

 

 

That's kinda where the similarity ends....One's a leader of the LA resistance to an Alien invasion the other is a child kidnapper who was described as an oddball and weirdo.....

Now which one is which????

 

1489125.main_image.jpg?strip=all

 

MichaelDonovan.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I half watched the 2nd episode as the missus had it on, but that was my thoughts on it. And not just Shannon, but this could effect her siblings too

And loads of others. It all just feels a bit like 'let's look at the poor people'

 

I wonder when we can look forward to 'The Friends of the McCanns, a fascinating insight into how the other families who went on that fated trip dealt with Madeleine's disappearance'

 

Now, that I would like to see

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How dare you

Who could have though drugging a child and leaving them to sleep while you leave the house for dinner could be dangerous

And then agreed never to speak about it again?

 

In fact, Dave should probably delete this before we're all dragged through the courts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And loads of others. It all just feels a bit like 'let's look at the poor people'

 

I wonder when we can look forward to 'The Friends of the McCanns, a fascinating insight into how the other families who went on that fated trip dealt with Madeleine's disappearance'

 

Now, that I would like to see

 

 

Good article by Brian Reade echoing your thoughts...

 

BBC drama The Moorside kicks Shannon Matthews' family when it's down

 

I’d love to have heard how the TV executives, keen to make a ratings winner about the reviled mother who faked the abduction of her own child, tried to justify it.

 

I’d love to have been present at the BBC meeting which gave the go-ahead for the Shannon Matthews drama, The Moorside .

I’d love to have heard how the executives, keen to make a ratings winner about the reviled mother who faked the abduction of her own child, tried to justify it.

 

 

 

Maybe one played devil’s advocate, and told them: “Matthews has served her time and is trying to rebuild her life, what if she gets vile abuse and death threats?”, only to be told by the ratings chasers that the country has her down as a scummy chav, so it won’t rebound on them.

 

“What about Shannon, who’s a ­vulnerable teenager with a new identity? This will be devastating for her.”

Well let’s not make it about her. Only show her briefly. Let’s spin it as a drama about the salt-of-the-earth neighbours who rallied to her cause.

“Yes, but when it happened they were portrayed as a feckless, feral underclass, epitomising Broken Britain. Why bring all that up again?”

Well it won’t be us that brings it up, will it?

 

“Shall we speak to Shannon and close relatives like her grandparents to see if they approve of us telling her story?”

No. Anything else? Good. Then let’s go make it, darlings.

 

Which they did. And 7.2 million watched. And Karen Matthews was bombarded with death threats and now fears for her life.

And a national paper ran an article headlined “The dark side of Moorside” regurgitating tales of an estate “like Beirut, only worse” full of benefits claimants, electronic tag wearers, car thieves and drunks.

And Shannon’s grandparents June and Gordon unleashed their anger, saying: “She deserves to live her life in peace. What happened to her was a trauma, a tragedy. It is sick and disgusting that it is being turned into a TV show. It isn’t entertainment.”

Well, her story clearly is to people in BBC drama, who maybe envy the ratings drawn by shows like Benefits Street and decided to grab a piece of the poverty porn action.

I’m all for hard-hitting, working-class dramas, but this seems far too close to the events. And it reeks of moral cowardice in the face of easy targets they knew were powerless to fight back.

 

Would the BBC commission, so soon, a drama about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann ? I doubt it. If they had, would they have done it without consulting the empowered middle-class McCanns? Never.

It was noticeable when aristocrat socialite Tara Palmer-Tomkinson died this week that tributes portrayed her as “a troubled woman who had it all, but whose demons made her make the wrong choices”.

You could argue, that as vile and ­unforgivable as Matthews’ crime was, she’s “a troubled woman who had sod all, but whose demons made her make the wrong choices.”

 

Yet how soon after TPT’s death would the BBC do a gratuitous drama about her at times sordid life, knowing it would bring pain to her friends and ­relatives, notably her close family friend, Prince Charles?

How would a TV exec react if a writer suggests: “Maybe we can have a young Harry and Wills playing at Highgrove when Tara staggers into the room with a globule of coke dangling from her nose?”

I’m guessing they’d erupt with laughter and boot the writer out of their office with the words “how on God’s earth would we get that past the BBC board, darling”.

Ah well. Maybe in Broken Britain, that’s the difference between the It Girls and the Sh** Girls.

 

http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/bbc-drama-moorside-kicks-shannon-9794673

 

 

 

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brian Reade's slow slide into self-parody is now complete.

 

The only responsibility that someone dramatising real-life events has is a responsibility to tell the truth.

 

Not to mention, the man is a tabloid journalist! He works for an organ that, every single day of its existence, is reporting on actual events, no doubt to the embarrassment and detriment of many of the people whose deeds it covers.

 

My advice to anyone who doesn't want their bad deeds immortalised in drama is to not do bad deeds in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brian Reade's slow slide into self-parody is now complete.

 

The only responsibility that someone dramatising real-life events has is a responsibility to tell the truth.

 

Not to mention, the man is a tabloid journalist! He works for an organ that, every single day of its existence, is reporting on actual events, no doubt to the embarrassment and detriment of many of the people whose deeds it covers.

 

My advice to anyone who doesn't want their bad deeds immortalised in drama is to not do bad deeds in the first place.

Wow talk about completely missing the point
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What were Shannon's bad deeds?

 

I wasn't aware she had any.

 

Since she's now living under a different name, and entitled to the lifelong anonymity that comes with it, it's hard to believe a dramatisation of these events would have an appreciable impact upon her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't aware she had any.

 

Since she's now living under a different name, and entitled to the lifelong anonymity that comes with it, it's hard to believe a dramatisation of these events would have an appreciable impact upon her.

Yeah because the memories and effects of what happened to her have all been magicked away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't aware she had any.

 

Since she's now living under a different name, and entitled to the lifelong anonymity that comes with it, it's hard to believe a dramatisation of these events would have an appreciable impact upon her.

You aren't actually being serious, are you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...