Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Are You Fuckin' Kiddin' Me........


RedSand
 Share

Recommended Posts

This has to be a piss take surely?

 

 

 

BBC NEWS | Americas | US chain drops 'terror scarf' ad

 

 

US chain drops 'terror scarf' ad

By James Coomarasamy

BBC News, Washington

 

 

 

Dunkin' Donuts said there was a "possibility of misperception"

 

 

The US chain Dunkin' Donuts has pulled an advert following complaints that the scarf worn by a celebrity chef offered symbolic support for Islamic extremism.

 

The online advert for iced coffee featured the well-known US television chef Rachael Ray.

 

She was wearing a black-and-white checked scarf around her neck that resembled a traditional Arab keffiyeh.

 

This fashion choice incensed at least one prominent conservative blogger, who said it evoked extremist videos.

 

The blogger called the garment "a regular adornment of Muslim terrorists appearing in beheading and hostage-taking videos".

 

Stylist's choice

 

Other criticism followed and the coffee and doughnuts chain has now decided to drop the advert.

Fashion statements may seem insignificant, but when they lead to the mainstreaming of violence - unintentionally or not - they matter

Michelle Malkin

 

 

In a statement, Dunkin' Donuts said the silk scarf had been "selected by Rachael Ray's stylist and that no symbolism was intended.

 

"But given the possibility of misperception the commercial was no longer being used."

 

This has caused a fair amount of consternation in some quarters but the conservative blogger at the centre of the row has praised the decision.

 

"Fashion statements may seem insignificant, but when they lead to the mainstreaming of violence - unintentionally or not - they matter," Malkin has written.

________________

 

 

I mean Come On. I Knew Michelle Malkin was nuts but this takes the cake.. or dougnut even...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PaddyBerger15

Has this Rachael Ray bird ever done any 'jumblats out' pics?

If Mr. Weeksie Cheeksie Schmeeksie moans about her, then he shouldn't be allowed near birds and does in fact like to nob young boys with tangerines strapped to their chests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has this Rachael Ray bird ever done any 'jumblats out' pics?

If Mr. Weeksie Cheeksie Schmeeksie moans about her, then he shouldn't be allowed near birds and does in fact like to nob young boys with tangerines strapped to their chests.

 

I think they're photoshopped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the woman who first pointed it out

 

m5.jpg

Someone should interview this woman.

 

"Isn't it true you only complained about the advert because Rachel Ray is attractive and you're an jealous pug-ugly bitch?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...