Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Rate the last film you watched...


Elite
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:


It was the acting from the main two for me. I accept it’s probably more an 8/10 than a 9. 


Stan’s role was a difficult balancing act - if he went too far he’d have made Trump the caricature he is today, not far enough and you don’t fully think he’s a cunt. He was very good, I’d have like a bit more “Trump” at the end.
 

Strong was very good.
 

Ivanka was the lass from Borat 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Scott_M said:


Stan’s role was a difficult balancing act - if he went too far he’d have made Trump the caricature he is today, not far enough and you don’t fully think he’s a cunt. He was very good, I’d have like a bit more “Trump” at the end.
 

Strong was very good.
 

Ivanka was the lass from Borat 2.


I think he was much more Trump towards the end. It was the slow growth of bellendary that the film was about. He was almost likeable at the start. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Arniepie said:

gladiator 2

almost a carbon copy of the 1st one but beyond absurd.

the "shark" battle was almost monumentally daft.

 

6/10 

 

Yeah I don't fancy it at all, that Mescal lad is wooden as fuck and there looks like there's about 15 villains in it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Section_31 said:

 

Yeah I don't fancy it at all, that Mescal lad is wooden as fuck and there looks like there's about 15 villains in it. 

 

I don't fancy it as it looks like the most pointless sequel since "Jaws : The Revenge" and the original is pretty much perfect. 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Elite said:

Gladiator 2 - 8/10

 

I really enjoyed this, was over the top but I don't think that detracted from the movie as a whole. Denzel stole the show though, unreal screen presence.

 

Watching this now and completely disagree, I think it's horrendous, and your boy Denzel is no fucking Batiatus.

 

That said, I thought the original film was pretty crap, vastly overrated, and this is just just an amplification of that mess.

 

Only adds weight to my thoughts that Ridley Scott is a washed up chancer who got lucky with Alien and (the overrated) Blade runner, and who's been serving up dross for the past 40 years.

 

2/10 and that's being generous

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Carvalho Diablo said:

 

Watching this now and completely disagree, I think it's horrendous, and your boy Denzel is no fucking Batiatus.

 

That said, I thought the original film was pretty crap, vastly overrated, and this is just just an amplification of that mess.

 

Only adds weight to my thoughts that Ridley Scott is a washed up chancer who got lucky with Alien and (the overrated) Blade runner, and who's been serving up dross for the past 40 years.

 

2/10 and that's being generous

*Thumbs down*

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Mook said:

Rosie Plays Julie, a 2019 Irish film by two of the people involved with Kin. This was pretty heavy going with some really nice cinematography, a girl goes off to find her real Mum only to discover a load of skeletons in the closet. 7/10


her mum died in an orgy? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 17/11/2024 at 00:40, Strontium said:

 

People accuse me of being argumentative, but here we have people arguing over my review of a film they haven't even seen. Ho hum.

 

You know what the New Atheism movement is. Dawkins, Hitchens, and that lot. You're not so old that you can't remember the backlash that people like that got in the United States when they started writing critically about religion. Back when only about 6% of Americans identified as irreligious, compared to around a quarter now.

It's not an age thing; I didn't notice at the time.  Obviously, I was aware that those people existed and (in the case of Dawkins, at least) that they'd started writing about Atheism; I don't think I ever heard (or paid attention to) any talk of a "New Atheist Movement".  Maybe in navel-gazing circles that sort of stuff caused a ripple, but I've never given that much weight to the musings of "the Commentariat".

 

Are you implying that the writings of Dawkins, Hitchens, etc, effected that change in the USA?  I'd like to see more evidence before I accept a claim like that.

 

I'm not arguing over your review of the film: I'm disputing your assertion that a film that's heavily critical of religion couldn't have been made 20 years ago.  There have been films critical of religion, in one way or another, for decades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

It's not an age thing; I didn't notice at the time.  Obviously, I was aware that those people existed and (in the case of Dawkins, at least) that they'd started writing about Atheism; I don't think I ever heard (or paid attention to) any talk of a "New Atheist Movement".  Maybe in navel-gazing circles that sort of stuff caused a ripple, but I've never given that much weight to the musings of "the Commentariat".

 

Are you implying that the writings of Dawkins, Hitchens, etc, effected that change in the USA?  I'd like to see more evidence before I accept a claim like that.

 

I'm not arguing over your review of the film: I'm disputing your assertion that a film that's heavily critical of religion couldn't have been made 20 years ago.  There have been films critical of religion, in one way or another, for decades.

 

They wrote on buses. As you well know, that works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 21/11/2024 at 18:18, Carvalho Diablo said:

 

Watching this now and completely disagree, I think it's horrendous, and your boy Denzel is no fucking Batiatus.

 

That said, I thought the original film was pretty crap, vastly overrated, and this is just just an amplification of that mess.

 

Only adds weight to my thoughts that Ridley Scott is a washed up chancer who got lucky with Alien and (the overrated) Blade runner, and who's been serving up dross for the past 40 years.

 

2/10 and that's being generous

 

Negged for saying Gladiator is "a mess" and Blade Runner is overrated.

 

It was Scott, Derek Vanlint and HR Giger that made Alien so good. I don't think he got lucky at all.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Total Longo said:

 

Negged for saying Gladiator is "a mess" and Blade Runner is overrated.

 

It was Scott, Derek Vanlint and HR Giger that made Alien so good. I don't think he got lucky at all.   

 

Surely Dan O'Bannon too, who first wrote it with Carpenter as a comedy in Dark Star.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SasaS said:

 

Surely Dan O'Bannon too, who first wrote it with Carpenter as a comedy in Dark Star.

 

Obviously, but like Blade Runner, that had rewrite after rewrite. My point was that in the hands of another director it may not have been anywhere near as good.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Total Longo said:

 

Obviously, but like Blade Runner, that had rewrite after rewrite. My point was that in the hands of another director it may not have been anywhere near as good.  

 

He is certainly a good director who was in top form at the time and directed two great films which turned out to be extremely influential.

 

Gladiator on the other hand, is a bit overrated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...