Paletta, Gabriel - M-Q - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Paletta, Gabriel

Recommended Posts


by Dave Usher

Date of Birth - 15/02/86
Nationality - Argentinian
Position - Defender
Games - 8
Goals - 1
Club Hons (Lpool) -
Intnl Hons - Argentina u21 Caps
Other Clubs - Banfield, Boca Juniors

Gabriel became the second Argentine to play for the reds when Rafa Benitez snapped him up for £2m in July 2006. The tough tackling centre back was regarded as one of the finest prospects in Argentine football, and River Plate boss, the legendary Daniel Passarella, had been hoping to persuade Paletta to join his side. Gabriel spurned his advances however, and embarked on his European dream by moving from Banfield to Anfield.

He made his debut for Banfield in 2005, but came to prominence playing for his country in the FIFA World u20 Championships. He played all seven games at the heart of the defence as an Argentinian side inspired by Lionel Messi lifted the trophy.

The following season (2005/06) saw Gabriel play 30 games for Banfield, and he managed to find the net on a couple of occasions. A typical Argentine defender, strong, aggressive and takes no prisoners.

His first game for Liverpool came in a pre-season friendly at Wrexham, and he made an immediately favourable impression with the fans with his combative style and assuredness in possession. He began the season in the reserves, and had to wait until the Carling Cup before he featured for the senior side. His debut came against Reading, and he marked it in some style with a headed goal at the Kop end.

He played against Birmingham in the next round, and made his Champions League bow in the 3-2 defeat at Galatasaray. He'd done ok in those games, but his lack of pace was severely exposed by Arsenal's frontline in the Gunners' 6-3 Carling Cup success at Anfield. He wasn't seen in the first team for a while after that, only appearing again towards the end of the season when Benitez rested a number of players in the Premiership so they could concentrate on the CL semi final and final.

It was becoming clear that the big defender was not suited to English football, and he returned home to Argentina with Boca Juniors in a deal that saw Emiliano Insua come to Anfield.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah.   Klopp made a good point in his post match presser. He asked the room if anybody thought it was a penalty and 1 or 2 said they did (probably local Naples reporters). But the fact a couple did means it wasn’t a clear & obvious error.    However, it certainly wasn’t a clear cut penalty either. Personally, I think if it was referred he’d have overturned it as he didn’t stand for any of their shit all night - and IMO it should have been referred.   I’ve said before I like VAR, or at least the idea of it, but the implementation isn’t as expected & it’s gotten worse since the World Cup 18 months ago (although not perfect, it was actually decent in Russia IMO).    Anyway, I’m over it. Treat it as a minor inconvenience / annoyance and back us to win the next 4.
    • Virgil Van Dijk has played down the impact of Liverpool’s 2-0 defeat at the hands of Napoli in their Champions League clash on Tuesday evening.

      The Reds were looking good for a well earned point against the Italian side before a debatable penalty and a late strike in injury time by Fernando Llorente was enough to see the home side claim the three points.

      But Van Dijk said the defeat which was only their second in a competitive fixture this campaign, was not a cause for worry.

      The Liverpool Echo reported the defender as saying:

      “It didn’t feel like a wake-up call, I think both sides were focused fully on the game, It felt like it was going to be a draw, and then the penalty changed everything in the game. 

      “It shouldn’t be a wake-up call - we have been performing since the start of the season outstanding, and so there is no reason to panic.

      “And in the game as well, we played well, we put them under pressure, we created opportunities on the break. 

      “So there were a lot of positive things , the only thing not positive was the result.”  

      Van Dijk believed the final score was not a true reflection of the overall contest and the performance was full of merit.

      He also believed the penalty awarded against Andy Robertson completely changed the outcome of the game.

      “I think 2-0 didn’t really reflect the game.

      “I think we were much better (than last season) we lost it (again), but we played well, we had opportunities on the break, we played in some moments.

      “We felt comfortable, then they got the penalty which changed the game.”

      “Lots of times you can say that it felt a little bit harsh, but the ref made the decision so you have to accept it.

      “Everyone knows how tough it is to come here and beat them, first of all, but also to play well against them. 

      “But you could see we put them under a lot of pressure to try and win the ball quite a lot high up the pitch, and try to break on them.”

      The Reds will look to return to winning ways when they play Chelsea at Stanford Bridge on Sunday afternoon.
      View full article
    • Excellent report as per usual Dave,I agree with you on the VAR.... but what if as was suggested (by someone!)that captains are given 3 chances to question the decision (tennis & cricket)... works fine there & doesn't take long & everyone knows what the fuck is happening at least! 
    • He was decent here, but we replaced him with a better player in Fabinho. 
    • Once Everton touches you, you're better off asking a friend to make it quick.
  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Contributors