Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Israel - A Rant


Rashid
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:


So you copied and pasted the first thing on Google without any idea of what the Houthi's are fighting against, or why they exist?

 

Cool.

 

I’ll portray this response as a reaction to the above argument and chuckle to myself about it.

 

 

 

 


 No. Why don’t you enlighten me. I’ll give you time to go on Wikipedia 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Section_31 said:

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has told Ireland to remove its peacekeepers from an outpost on the border with Lebanon as its invasion of the country continues.

Sources confirmed the request was made to the headquarters of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (Unifil) and individual countries contributing troops, including Ireland. Israel has been told the troops will remain in place.

I live in a town with a population of approx. 450 people. Two young fellas in their early 20s graduated in the army this summer and are supposed to be heading to Lebanon in 2 weeks for a stint. Was chatting to both their fathers' in the pub last weekend and they're absolutely shitting it about their kids heading off out there.

 

A grim situation when you're trying to "peacekeep" with a bunch of blood thirsty fucking nazi cunts.

  • Upvote 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Bruce Spanner said:


The problem with that is that they kind of are.

 

Iran backs and funds Hezbollah, Houthi and many more militias that act in a quasi political sense in countries and bring little but instability, conflict and violence.

 

Their started aim is the dissolution of the Israeli state, this is in no small part because Isreal has acted like absolute cunts with impunity for the past far too many decades.

 

The ME is a fucking basket case because the ‘West’ have treated it like countries and states instead of the semi autonomous tribal regions it is and tried to squeeze it by installing tribes as governments at the exclusion of other tribes and then been amazed when it kicks off.

 

Lines don’t equal countries, as any fool should know.


The only thing I would add here Bruce is that Iran’s “stated aim” of eliminating the Israeli state is just bullshit they use to cover their real aim of growing their own influence and interests in the region (Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon, Syria, …). They attack Israel at the expense of Arab blood and Arab land, never Iranian blood and Iranian land. And they have no problem throwing their Arab proxies under the bus when push comes to shove, or when they are offered a good deal.

 

Israel on the other side needs an aggressor like Iran in order to justify its own crimes and territorial expansion in the name of self defense. South Lebanon is the immediate territorial expansion target at this stage. Their end game will not be seen during our lifetime, and they certainly need Iran for the long haul.


The presence of Israel in the region is key for Iran, and the presence of Iran is key for Israel. One will not seek to eliminate the other.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 04/10/2024 at 22:27, Carradona said:

I live in a town with a population of approx. 450 people. Two young fellas in their early 20s graduated in the army this summer and are supposed to be heading to Lebanon in 2 weeks for a stint. Was chatting to both their fathers' in the pub last weekend and they're absolutely shitting it about their kids heading off out there.

 

A grim situation when you're trying to "peacekeep" with a bunch of blood thirsty fucking nazi cunts.

 

17 hours ago, Carradona said:

 

FUCK ISRAEL


 

That’s all very well, but why aren’t they peacekeeping in the Congo? This is just performative, antisemitic peacekeeping.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 05/10/2024 at 09:40, Section_31 said:

 

I've been wondering if he's doing the same for a while now. It'll probably be brushed aside though as Dems go on about Russian interference and Reps do the same with China or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, M_B said:

The F-35 is an American plane.

 

It's a result of the Joint Strike Fighter program, and the UK was the only Tier 1 partner. Some British Companies have licences to supply component parts for the F-35 program. Things like part of the tails and electronics (BAE), parts for the LiftSystem used in F-35B (Rolls-Royce), aerial refuelling parts (Cobham), and others. These parts might - might - make their way to an Israeli plane. The idea that part of a wing or tail fin from a British business makes the government 'complicit in genocide' is actually pathetic and a real desperate reach to be able to say 'Starmer kills kids'. There are components licences issued through licenses granted by the Export Control Joint Unit (ECJU), which operates within the Department for International Trade (DIT). Licenses to export parts to Israel for the F-35 would have been subject to the UK's arms export policy, including considerations of human rights and regional stability. Stopping those components entering the supply chain pool, which includes the same parts from other sources that can go to any other of the many countries that have F-35s, wouldn't mean anything operationally.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

 

It's a result of the Joint Strike Fighter program, and the UK was the only Tier 1 partner. Some British Companies have licences to supply component parts for the F-35 program. Things like part of the tails and electronics (BAE), parts for the LiftSystem used in F-35B (Rolls-Royce), aerial refuelling parts (Cobham), and others. These parts might - might - make their way to an Israeli plane. The idea that part of a wing or tail fin from a British business makes the government 'complicit in genocide' is actually pathetic and a real desperate reach to be able to say 'Starmer kills kids'. There are components licences issued through licenses granted by the Export Control Joint Unit (ECJU), which operates within the Department for International Trade (DIT). Licenses to export parts to Israel for the F-35 would have been subject to the UK's arms export policy, including considerations of human rights and regional stability. Stopping those components entering the supply chain pool, which includes the same parts from other sources that can go to any other of the many countries that have F-35s, wouldn't mean anything operationally.

 

 


They could ban all parts of arms sales to Israel. If a gun shop owner sells someone for example a silencer or a rifle scope knowing full well it will be used on a gun in a mass killing against innocent people, the shop guy is complicit. 
 

Is Starmer killing children? No course he isn’t. Is he in a position to at least stop some of it? Yeah I reckon he is. Or at least take the correct moral standpoint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

Is Starmer killing children? No course he isn’t. Is he in a position to at least stop some of it? Yeah I reckon he is. Or at least take the correct moral standpoint. 

 

I don't think that's right, to be honest; I don't think banning all sales of components (that amounts to less than 1% of Israel's defence imports) would do anything at all to their offensive capability. These are parts that go into a pool, not directly to Israel. Other countries, like the US, also put the parts in. 

 

I do take your point about the moral standpoint, but I don't think the analogy in your first paragraph is applicable here. Just my view. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...