Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Richard Hughes, director of football


Kevin D
 Share

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, dave u said:

 

Eat worms? What have I missed here, is that a thing now? I thought it was just Sean Dyche.


Bill Gates and his pals at the New World Order want us to eat bugs instead of meat to stop climate change or something. I wouldn’t listen to them they’ve been shit since Hall, Nash and Hogan left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gkmacca said:

Any decent journalist (let's call him or her a 'reporter') will point out the inaccuracy of an official position. And the club's version is plainly, undeniably, inaccurate.

 

And that's not some minor, niche, issue. It's a huge issue.

 

The club keeps putting out the claim that Slot inherited an excellent squad that can only be improved by genuinely special talents. This is simply untrue. Slot inherited a squad that had some good players but also some glaring gaps, and had fallen away badly in the last part of the season. Then several players left.

 

So Slot now has a squad that is smaller than the one that was found wanting last season. 

 

So the idea that Slot has some wonderfully varied, ticking-all-the-boxes squad of stellar talents, full to bursting, is insulting nonsense. There is absolutely no justification in any 'reporter' keeping repeating that claim as if it's indisputably correct. 

 

Hughes is overseeing a depleted squad that now requires more players just to recover the size and standard that the club keeps pretending is still there.

 

Report that, why don't they?


That’s not journalism. That’s opinion. He could write that, but it wouldn’t be journalism. 
 

And Slot is the one always talking about the excellence of the squad he inherited. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to hand it to Hughes, he's sat quietly and allowed this thread to turn into a discussion on Pearce's journalistic merit, and not his own abject failure in the transfer market. He's a slippery little bastard.

  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Chris said:


That’s not journalism. That’s opinion. He could write that, but it wouldn’t be journalism. 
 

And Slot is the one always talking about the excellence of the squad he inherited. 

 

Reporting on inaccuracies is not 'opinion'. Don't be ridiculous. And where did you find your speciously apodictic definition of journalism, anyway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, gkmacca said:

 

Reporting on inaccuracies is not 'opinion'. Don't be ridiculous. And where did you find your speciously apodictic definition of journalism, anyway?

 

To answer your question: 2001-2004: Liverpool John Moores University – BA Hons Journalism; 1st class. After that, a 20 year career in it (barring a couple of years break where I dabbled in performing arts marketing at LIPA)

 

Him reporting what the club is saying, re availability, squad quality is reporting. Him directly contradicting that would be his opinion and such a piece would be labelled as such. If he gets someone else to say that; a source within the club, a prominent ex-player then it's reporting/journalism.

 

 

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Chris said:

 

To answer your question: 2001-2004: Liverpool John Moores University – BA Hons Journalism; 1st class. After that, a 20 year career in it (barring a couple of years break where I dabbled in performing arts marketing at LIPA)

 

Him reporting what the club is saying, re availability, squad quality is reporting. Him directly contradicting that would be his opinion and such a piece would be labelled as such. If he gets someone else to say that; a source within the club, a prominent ex-player then it's reporting/journalism.

 

 

 

Nice CV, pal. Knew your Pearce thing is because you're in the biz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chris said:

 

To answer your question: 2001-2004: Liverpool John Moores University – BA Hons Journalism; 1st class. After that, a 20 year career in it (barring a couple of years break where I dabbled in performing arts marketing at LIPA)

 

Him reporting what the club is saying, re availability, squad quality is reporting. Him directly contradicting that would be his opinion and such a piece would be labelled as such. If he gets someone else to say that; a source within the club, a prominent ex-player then it's reporting/journalism.

 

 

 

 

Oh how very impressive. Double First, doctorate, Fellowship, King's College Cambridge. What larks, eh? Any more lists to boast about? You sound a bit chippy. But that's just an opinion.

 

Your definition, I repeat, is insultingly misleading. It sounds like it's been bounced about inside the heads of Leslie Stephen and Karl Popper. Poor old John Wilkes. Maybe if you gave up your pose as the God-like arbiter of what does and doesn't pass for journalism, you might be able to contribute as, you know, one of those ordinary posters you seem to despise.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gkmacca said:

 

Oh how very impressive. Double First, doctorate, Fellowship, King's College Cambridge. What larks, eh? Any more lists to boast about? You sound a bit chippy. But that's just an opinion.

 

Your definition, I repeat, is insultingly misleading. It sounds like it's been bounced about inside the heads of Leslie Stephen and Karl Popper. Poor old John Wilkes. Maybe if you gave up your pose as the God-like arbiter of what does and doesn't pass for journalism, you might be able to contribute as, you know, one of those ordinary posters you seem to despise.

 

Good chat. 

 

EDIT: It wasn't meant to be impressive. It was a shit course at a shit uni that did nothing to prepare me for what came after. You asked, I answered. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Chris said:

 

To answer your question: 2001-2004: Liverpool John Moores University – BA Hons Journalism; 1st class. After that, a 20 year career in it (barring a couple of years break where I dabbled in performing arts marketing at LIPA)

 

Him reporting what the club is saying, re availability, squad quality is reporting. Him directly contradicting that would be his opinion and such a piece would be labelled as such. If he gets someone else to say that; a source within the club, a prominent ex-player then it's reporting/journalism.

 

 

 

Did you go to SFX by any chance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Kevin D said:

Curious tenure so far. 

 

Very little evidence that he's been brought in to improve the team.

He's a fucking fraud.

 

Tasked with raising as much money as possible to fill John's pockets, won't renew Salah Virg or Trent because we see Bradley Quansah and Doak as viable replacements and what's even better is we don't have to pay any of them near as much!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...