Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Southport stabbings


Furmedge
 Share

Recommended Posts

Disgusting question by Rigby.

 

"You didn't reveal these details at the time (while the riots were happening) does that mean no matter what the inquiry finds, trust is undermined in you and your government".

 

Pretending there she doesn't know how the justice system works, the dick.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

Disgusting question by Rigby.

 

"You didn't reveal these details at the time (while the riots were happening) does that mean no matter what the inquiry finds, trust is undermined in you and your government".

 

Pretending there she doesn't know how the justice system works, the dick.

Straight out of the Kay Burley school of gobshiteism.

 

I love how he batted that straight back to her as well, effectively saying to her that she knows what she's doing.

 

Badenoch (she reminds me of Chet, in Weird Science, when he gets turned into a big lump of shit.) will no doubt repeat that bullshit narrative and will be lauded in the British Propaganda sheets.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Paulie Dangerously said:

He was reported to PREVENT multiple times and still wasn't stopped. Seems like yet another systematic failure. 


He’s thrown prevent under the bus a bit there though. He wasn’t reported at the time for any terrorism suspicions he was reported for searching for weapons etc, there wasn’t anything ideological so it was passed on to the police because prevent aren’t there for potentially dangerous criminals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PREVENT are only looking at Muslims who misspell terraced house aren't they?

Christians seemingly get a free pass to have an unhealthy obsession with genocide. When Social Services need the police with them when visiting this kid, alarm bells should be ringing all over the place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:


He’s thrown prevent under the bus a bit there though. He wasn’t reported at the time for any terrorism suspicions he was reported for searching for weapons etc, there wasn’t anything ideological so it was passed on to the police because prevent aren’t there for potentially dangerous criminals. 

That in itself is a systemic failure. If someone doesn't have a radical ideology, but they're dangerous, what's the process to ensure the safety of the general public?

 

7 minutes ago, skend04 said:

PREVENT are only looking at Muslims who misspell terraced house aren't they?

Christians seemingly get a free pass to have an unhealthy obsession with genocide. When Social Services need the police with them when visiting this kid, alarm bells should be ringing all over the place.

I thought he was from a Muslim family, although not 'radicalised', is that not right?

 

What other recent examples are there of Christians being obsessed with genocide?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Section_31 said:

Disgusting question by Rigby.

 

"You didn't reveal these details at the time (while the riots were happening) does that mean no matter what the inquiry finds, trust is undermined in you and your government".

 

Pretending there she doesn't know how the justice system works, the dick.

 

It seems this justice system isn't helping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always think people that do stuff like this aren't radicalised to violence, they're radicalised to their world view - but to carry out that level of violence you're a psycho anyway. If they weren't doing it in the name of ISIS or some shit, they'd be doing it in the name of hating women/hating their parents or simply because they like killing people. They're the same type of people who become serial killers. 

 

It's a bit like the way loads of UDA/IRA types ended up becoming gangsters after the good Friday agreement,  they were just the type of people who liked hurting people, once they lost one excuse they'd find another. 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Geoff Woade said:

And a neg from ‘Pious of Tuebrook, Chief White Knight, Hand Wringer Extraordinaire, Lord of the Preachy Soy Brigade to follow up. That’s cheered me up to be fair.

boss name for a band that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Starmer talked about the changing nature of terrorism, and he questioned whether the legal architecture of the state has kept pace with that. He also announced that Lord Anderson KC is going to look at the Prevent counter-terrorism system, which as we now know failed to pick up Rudakubana after he was referred.

But then he talked much more broadly about society, about how "too many people have fallen into parallel lives", and about the rights and obligations that people once would have owed to one another fraying.

This was the prime minister promising that he will deal with not just the specific things that have come out in this case, but also wanting to use those to address what he sees as failings in British society.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gb news..absolute nap

 

The prime minister is now asked if he regrets blaming the far-right for the riots in Southport.

Starmer reiterates that the responsibility for the violence lies with those who perpetrated it.

He recalls "seeing the impact" on workers in Southport who responded to the stabbings, when he visited to the scene. He says those same officers were then policing the riots that followed and had objects thrown at them.

"Nobody can justify that," he says.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Spy Bee said:

That in itself is a systemic failure. If someone doesn't have a radical ideology, but they're dangerous, what's the process to ensure the safety of the general public?

 

I thought he was from a Muslim family, although not 'radicalised', is that not right?

 

What other recent examples are there of Christians being obsessed with genocide?

 

Nope, they are Evangelical Christians. I was being facetious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Spy Bee said:

That in itself is a systemic failure. If someone doesn't have a radical ideology, but they're dangerous, what's the process to ensure the safety of the general public?

 

I thought he was from a Muslim family, although not 'radicalised', is that not right?

 

What other recent examples are there of Christians being obsessed with genocide?

fairy sure his family are christians

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Spy Bee said:

That in itself is a systemic failure. If someone doesn't have a radical ideology, but they're dangerous, what's the process to ensure the safety of the general public?

 

 


Well that’s what the police are for. But of course they’re too busy arresting genocide protestors and cunts with dodgy sticks than doing the proper police work. (Not all obviously and I say that with a hint of pettiness) 

 

I believe his dad was spoken to about it. Apparently dangerous activity even without radical motives will go under prevent which is ironic considering they are over stretched as it is and funding was cut last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from what I gather there was no concerns about a terrorist ideology, but he was obsessed with violence.

But you cant nick someone for that?

There are probably countless oddball’s around the country who are obsessed wirth violence, but dont go on to do something as horrific as that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Arniepie said:

from what I gather there was no concerns about a terrorist ideology, but he was obsessed with violence.

But you cant nick someone for that?

 

No, but you can detain them under Section 2 and 3 of the Mental Health Act.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Spy Bee said:

I think being obsessed with violence qualifies. If it doesn't, it should,

there are prob loads of cranks around the country obsessed with violence,

 

I suppose they have to assess how likely they are going to act on it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

 

In what sense? 

 

Not prejudicing a case is law 101 - journalists learn it from day one. 

 

Well, it doesn't work in real life. It only serves to create a fertile ground for rumours because it leaves society in the dark with respect to motives and details of most crimes. Jurors then learn the details during trial and what they learn serves to influence or "prejudice" their opinion anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SasaS said:

 

Well, it doesn't work in real life. It only serves to create a fertile ground for rumours because it leaves society in the dark with respect to motives and details of most crimes. Jurors then learn the details during trial and what they learn serves to influence or "prejudice" their opinion anyway.

 

People are increasingly incapable of discerning between fact and fiction anyway, those riots were largely sparked by an angry egg who's on trial for people trafficking in Romania. If your first response to that isn't to fact check, but to take a load of Magners to Southport and start smashing up phone-boxes, there's no reasoning with you anyway. 

 

Jury trials aren't ideal but they're the best we've managed to come up with. 

 

Farage, GB News, and all those other cunts can fuck right off. They only want to sow chaos for money. 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...