HMP Wandsworth (NSFW)

[TheHowieLama]

Dry - prison style.

[lifetime fan]

40 minutes ago, Tj hooker said:

Yep 

 

[redheart]

19 hours ago, Curly said:

What would she be arrested for? I saw someone mention about inmates not being able to give consent so it’s rape or something? Surely she won’t be prosecuted beyond some restrictions for her future employment - like not working with vulnerable people say. 

 

Women cannot legally commit rape only men can

[lifetime fan]

1 minute ago, redheart said:

 

Women cannot legally commit rape only men can

You’re wrong, but I know where you’re coming from. 

[redheart]

1 hour ago, lifetime fan said:

You’re wrong, but I know where you’re coming from. 

 

No I am not. You can only commit rape if you have a penis. There are other sexual offences that a woman can commit but not rape.

 

Just to be clear I am not including transwomen in this

[Lee909]

Funny that she will likely get a custodial sentence when all the MP that have got up to shit, including Pritti Patel talking leaders of foreign governments behind our government back and she got suspended and then promoted didnt she

[lifetime fan]

20 minutes ago, redheart said:

 

No I am not. You can only commit rape if you have a penis. There are other sexual offences that a woman can commit but not rape.

 

Just to be clear I am not including transwomen in this

My understanding is they can be charged with rape as an accomplice, I’d let @Anubis clarify though if I’m wrong. 

[redheart]

You can on

7 minutes ago, lifetime fan said:

My understanding is they can be charged with rape as an accomplice, I’d let @Anubis clarify though if I’m wrong. 

As an accomplice yes but not in relation to rape.

 

However, she would have to help a man commit a rape. Who did she do this to? Who did the man rape?

 

As she was a consensual participant there is no rape committed to her and as no rape as been committed then she cannot be an accomplice

[Anubis]

44 minutes ago, lifetime fan said:

My understanding is they can be charged with rape as an accomplice, I’d let @Anubis clarify though if I’m wrong. 

A woman would be charged with causing sexual activity without consent (s4 Sexual Offences Act) if she forced a man to have sex without his consent.

 

A woman can be an accomplice to rape.

[redheart]

4 minutes ago, Anubis said:

A woman would be charged with causing sexual activity without consent (s4 Sexual Offences Act) if she forced a man to have sex without his consent.

 

A woman can be an accomplice to rape.

 

As stated yes there are other sexual offences a woman can be charged with but not rape (no penis).

 

Yes a woman can be an accomplice but there has to be a rape. Who was raped in the video?

[AngryOfTuebrook]

1 hour ago, redheart said:

 

No I am not. You can only commit rape if you have a penis. There are other sexual offences that a woman can commit but not rape.

 

Just to be clear I am not including transwomen in this

I looked that up a while back and I've got to say I was surprised.  Someone can forcibly fuck you up the arse with a massive dildo and not be charged with rape.

[redheart]

2 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

I looked that up a while back and I've got to say I was surprised.  Someone can forcibly fuck you up the arse with a massive dildo and not be charged with rape.

Because it is sexual activity but no sex. For some reason the law has always drawn a distinction

[Anubis]

4 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

I looked that up a while back and I've got to say I was surprised.  Someone can forcibly fuck you up the arse with a massive dildo and not be charged with rape.

But the offence is penetrative so under S4 carries a life sentence, the same as rape.

[Section_31]

5 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

I looked that up a while back and I've got to say I was surprised.  Someone can forcibly fuck you up the arse with a massive dildo and not be charged with rape.

 

I've always found the offence of "digital penetrattion" amusing, fingerings someone to a Gary Numan soundtrack.

[redheart]

21 minutes ago, Anubis said:

But the offence is penetrative so under S4 carries a life sentence, the same as rape.

 

Yes but the offence is causing the penetration and not doing the penetration.

 

The history of rape and  sexual offences in England and Wales is not rational

[Binomial]

She was married??

 

Could you imagine the poor guy at home - "how was your day at work hunny"

[Anubis]

.

[Anubis]

.

[A Red]

51 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

I looked that up a while back and I've got to say I was surprised.  Someone can forcibly fuck you up the arse with a massive dildo and not be charged with rape.

You need to move on

[AngryOfTuebrook]

17 minutes ago, A Red said:

You need to move on

You could have at least bought me dinner first.

[TheHowieLama]

41 minutes ago, redheart said:

The history of rape and  sexual offences in England and Wales is not rational

 

It is based on conception - religious stuff.

[VladimirIlyich]

1 hour ago, Anubis said:

A woman would be charged with causing sexual activity without consent (s4 Sexual Offences Act) if she forced a man to have sex without his consent.

 

A woman can be an accomplice to rape.

That actually happens? Free of charge?

[Spy Bee]

 

Real shortage of pics

[Spy Bee]

[Spy Bee]

The prisons are overcrowded they say, then this gets released.