Michael Edwards Return Confirmed

[Jairzinho]

Up there with Shanks, for me.

[TD_LFC]

9 hours ago, Barrington Womble said:

Take a data book seriously. How silly of me. 

 

Edit... And the idea of being funny, you shouldn't need telling it is. But it was clearly so unfunny, he had to actually put it in the book. 

 

Didn't see your edit, he didn't put it in the book, it was an unprompted clarification in an interview he did when the interviewer mentioned the book coming out.

 

not sure why it's riled you so much when it means nothing, it's ironic, flippant, it's not meant to be outright funny, it's just a title of a book.

[KMD7]

 

10 minutes ago, Jairzinho said:

Up there with Shanks, for me.

 

Paisley 

Shanks

Kenny 

Edwards

Fagan. 

Rafa

Ged

[Jairzinho]

3 minutes ago, KMD7 said:

 

 

Paisley 

Shanks

Kenny 

Edwards

Fagan. 

Rafa

Ged

 

Edwards

Pascoe

Shanks

Ian Graham

Hodgson 

Paisley 

[Barrington Womble]

1 hour ago, TD_LFC said:

 

Didn't see your edit, he didn't put it in the book, it was an unprompted clarification in an interview he did when the interviewer mentioned the book coming out.

 

not sure why it's riled you so much when it means nothing, it's ironic, flippant, it's not meant to be outright funny, it's just a title of a book.

It riles me because it comes across exactly as he knows it comes across, he sounds a twat, hence the clarification 

[joe_fishfish]

He probably hasn’t picked the title himself, it will have been the publisher 

[El Rojo]

11 hours ago, Kevin D said:

More self-aggrandising from these tedious gimps.

Could they do it in Stoke on a cold Tuesday night with poor Wi-Fi on their tablets?

[lifetime fan]

5 hours ago, Barrington Womble said:

It riles me because it comes across exactly as he knows it comes across, he sounds a twat, hence the clarification 

He comes across as an even bigger bellend on the podcast. 

[Riley Greenleaf]

9 hours ago, Jairzinho said:

 

Edwards

Pascoe

Shanks

Ian Graham

Hodgson 

Paisley 

Seconded 

[Josef Svejk]

On 11/08/2024 at 08:27, Jairzinho said:

 

Edwards

Pascoe

Shanks

Ian Graham

Hodgson 

Paisley 

 

Hughes enters the frame...

[No2]

That's embarrassing, his first attempt at signing a player and it's a public failure. Shite like this should be kept private, first sign of rumour it should be Pearced. Get Jorge on the phone and have him ring any of the dozen No 6s in the PL that are better than ours, I bet you he had pinkies number from the Euros, just get him.

[3 Stacks]

2 minutes ago, No2 said:

That's embarrassing, his first attempt at signing a player and it's a public failure. Shite like this should be kept private, first sign of rumour it should be Pearced. Get Jorge on the phone and have him ring any of the dozen No 6s in the PL that are better than ours, I bet you he had pinkies number from the Euros, just get him.

Wow, what a change of tune.

[No2]

2 minutes ago, 3 Stacks said:

Wow, what a change of tune.

No it's not.

[Carvalho Diablo]

[Kevin D]

I preferred it when he wasn't here.

[El Rojo]

On 11/08/2024 at 07:10, Jairzinho said:

Up there with Shanks, for me.

ARMITAGE Shanks more like.

 

WASHING AWAY our season’s prospects and not even TAPping up targets.

[Bobby Hundreds]

I think he should send Klopp a thank you letter every day of his life.

[Jairzinho]

Just now, El Rojo said:

ARMITAGE Shanks more like.

 

WASHING AWAY our season’s prospects and not even TAPping up targets.

 

SINK.

[Daisy]

On 12/03/2024 at 09:54, Daisy said:

He was shit without Klopp. Not entirely sure about this 

 

Now he's just a massive fucking cunt

[gkmacca]

I think Edwards and Hughes really need either to clarify between them what their responsibilities are, or, if they've already done that, clarify the matter for outsiders, because even now people are switching between them in a completely subjective manner - we get a decent clause in a contract, it must be Edwards; we don't get a signing completed, it must be Hughes; etc etc. Edwards probably enjoys the way he only seems to get associated with stuff when it shows him in a good light, but Hughes ought to be wary about that media (and fan) trend.

 

When Edwards returned I did say I hoped he wouldn't try to stay as aloof and silent as he was the last time around - with more responsibility ought to come more readiness to engage with the public. Now Hughes seems to be content with embracing that model of muteness, but it's really not that wise a strategy. Edwards was helped when he was DoF by Klopp being such a great PR man. He explained and defended and protected Edwards whilst the man himself hid from the cameras and indulged in the myth-making. Slot can't, and shouldn't, be expected to do that for Hughes. But fans need to be given at least a tiny bit of reassurance as to what the hell is going on, and it's not coming from either of these pretty smug-seeming suits.

 

When you've got even the Echo 'Blood Red' hacks openly questioning the decisions and talking about asset-stripping, you've really provoked even the normally submissive part of the following.

[Shitty Arse]

He’s been a revelation since he’s been back hasn’t he? We are raking it in. 

[Kevin D]

The pre-Klopp and post-Klopp evidence suggests Edwards is not the genius he loves leaking stories to The Athletic he thinks he is.

 

 

 

 

[Kevin D]

The smug conceited cunt has been shown up, yet again.

[Kevin D]

Swallow your pride, grab your dick, and give Salah & Van Dijk the 2 year extensions they clearly deserve.

[El Rojo]

The Return Of The King.