Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Man City (A) - Sat 25th Nov 2023 (12:30pm)


Trumo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Great result from a poor game. City will be more disappointed and considering they were at home looking at making record victories, they were worse than us. Most of their chances, including the goal came from our fuck ups. Trent was great today and his goal was old school TAA.

I thought Macca was ok, got his foot in a few times and was about the only one who did first half. Much prefer Gravenberch to Jones. Sorry but he’s continually turning 180 degrees instead of laying the ball of, Grave turns and goes forward. Szobo was a bit meh.

Ali was piss poor with his feet, but he often is, I can’t get my head around us playing it back to him rather than testing their high defence with balls over the top.  Mad.

Anyway, happy, we are loads better than last season and need 3 or 4 of the players to step up In confidence and we’ll be fucking great. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pissed me off on the radio before saying we have  'fierce rivalry'. I don't consider city to be anywhere remotely in the same stratosphere as us as a club, they're inconsequential, juiced up footballing flotsam.

 

I wouldn't wipe my arse with these matches but Guardiola has clearly been told by the marketing department to pump these games up. 

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, an tha said:

Given the usually very high pts totals needed to finish ahead of abu dhabi and the fact they are proven front runners - who drop few pts, avoiding defeat today which would have seen us fall 4 pts behind them is a very good result.

 

4 pts to them even this early would have been a potentially quite significant lead....

 

The draw keeps us right bang on their tails - i don't think the importance of that can be overrated at all.

 

 

The reason we have come 2nd to City many times is that we don't win enough and draw too many. In contrast, they manage to go on massive winning streaks pretty much every season.

 

The point is that scraping a draw here, or even beating these, does not then by rule mean we won't drop a bunch of points against bad teams, or away from home, which we do more than them.

 

Playing the best team in the world, away, has literally nothing to do with the context of any of our other games in a season. That's why it's not that important or indicative of much.

  • Downvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 3 Stacks said:

The reason we have come 2nd to City many times is that we don't win enough and draw too many. In contrast, they manage to go on massive winning streaks pretty much every season.

 

The point is that scraping a draw here, or even beating these, does not then by rule mean we won't drop a bunch of points against bad teams, or away from home, which we do more than them.

 

Playing the best team in the world, away, has literally nothing to do with the context of any of our other games in a season. That's why it's not that important or indicative of much.

Nobody suggests it means we won't drop pts elsewhere - but if you can't or won't see the significance of not falling 4 pts behind them today then I can't help you, mate.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 3 Stacks said:

The reason we have come 2nd to City many times is that we don't win enough and draw too many. In contrast, they manage to go on massive winning streaks pretty much every season.

 

The point is that scraping a draw here, or even beating these, does not then by rule mean we won't drop a bunch of points against bad teams, or away from home, which we do more than them.

 

Playing the best team in the world, away, has literally nothing to do with the context of any of our other games in a season. That's why it's not that important or indicative of much.

The very definition of glass half empty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 3 Stacks said:

No, it isn't. It's neither positive or negative.

We get 90 points but aren’t champions, so to not see the team in a positive light after falling short in extraordinary circumstances is pretty half empty, for me anyway. Then to secure a point away at a team that have won 23 on the trot, and to see that negatively is also half empty. So that’s full empty, ha. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 3 Stacks said:

It's a better result for us than for them, but no, we did not really carry a threat. Realistically, City should have won this 1-0, but a moment of individual quality gave us a draw. Cool.

 

The credit you can give us is we had a pretty good shape and didn't break. Given loads of people thought we could win this game, though, you'd think they'd expect more than that, but I personally didn't. And that's fine, the importance of this game is overrated in the context of the season.

 

 

 

You don't have chat shit. They also scored from one moment of individual quality, Ali made 1 good save, so did Ederson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, No2 said:

You don't have chat shit. They also scored from one moment of individual quality, Ali made 1 good save, so did Ederson. 

 

It was more of a mistake from us, if anything. Dom and Trent let Ake dance around them like traffic cones. Ali was poor on the shot as well, think he parries that around the post on a normal, non-shite day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ZonkoVille77 said:

We were poor but the point is welcomed. I would have thought the main aim was to get back into the CL with anything else being a bonus. There was lots to like about the overall discipline but the failure to create was disappointing. Onwards and sidewards. We're fuckin shite. 

I thought we were far from poor, just checked the stats before posting and seen they had 61% possession. It felt like we had more of the ball than them for long periods, I thought Mc Aallister was excellent, as were the back 4. Mo looked dangerous without actually ever getting much a chance but there was a sense this was a really evenly matched game and a goal was coming. Jota was poor, he's not suited to these games were we try build slowly, he loses it far to much for that type of game. Elliot, Endo and Gravenberch were all decent as well when they came on.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, No2 said:

I thought we were far from poor, just checked the stats before posting and seen they had 61% possession. It felt like we had more of the ball than them for long periods, I thought Mc Aallister was excellent, as were the back 4. Mo looked dangerous without actually ever getting much a chance but there was a sense this was a really evenly matched game and a goal was coming. Jota was poor, he's not suited to these games were we try build slowly, he loses it far to much for that type of game. Elliot, Endo and Gravenberch were all decent as well when they came on.

Agree with all that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, No2 said:

 Jota was poor, he's not suited to these games were we try build slowly, he loses it far to much for that type of game. Elliot, Endo and Gravenberch were all decent as well when they came on.

 

Agree with all of the above. The 3 subs brought much needed energy when they came on. I just felt the forwards' link up play was poor and rushed at times. The midfield created little but worked well with the defence and kept them relatively quiet. A welcome point and I'm sure Klopp would feel the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Section_31 said:

Pissed me off on the radio before saying we have  'fierce rivalry'. I don't consider city to be anywhere remotely in the same stratosphere as us as a club, they're inconsequential, juiced up footballing flotsam.

 

I wouldn't wipe my arse with these matches but Guardiola has clearly been told by the marketing department to pump these games up. 

There's a difference between "rivals" and "competitors".

 

Competitors - in our case, we've had Leeds, Nottingham Forest, Arsenal, Chelsea, etc. at different times before City got rich - are like your work mates: fun for a bit, but when you go your separate ways, you don't give a shit about them. 

 

Rivals - Everton and Man United - are like your real friends: you take an interest in their fortunes wherever they go and whatever they do.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...