Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Someone’s Having a Real Laugh - How Long Until They ‘Bin Bag’ Ten Hag?


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Anubis said:

It's brillant the number of Utd fans contorting stats from the Liverpool game to suggest it was an equal contest, and support Ten Hag's 'process' no matter what. This is the delusion we need to keep Discount Ming in place.

If ever stats betrayed your eyes, then this match was it. 
 

IMG_0290.jpeg

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Vincent Vega said:

If ever stats betrayed your eyes, then this match was it. 
 

IMG_0290.jpeg

 

The thing with this game though, is it was effectively won and lost in a 21 minute spell. It was pretty even before we scored - in fact just dull even, nothing was happening despite Gary Neville's & Drury's words that it was an open game. Then from 35-56 mins, we wiped the floor with them. And it was game over and we were happy to let them have the ball. So the built up both possession stats and attempts on goal. If zirkzee had scored either of those big chances rashford put on a plate for him, the pattern of the game may have changed. But they kept wasting the chances they could create and as the score was 0-3, it felt there was no real jeopardy when they got those chances. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Anubis said:

Never change Utd fans. Never change.
 

image.jpeg

 

I'm not sure what my favorite part of that is;

 

"you get past Bruno Fernandes" (?)

 

or 

 

"You somehow get past Casemiro". 

 

Probably "you somehow get past Casemiro". 

 

We managed it all because we learned the dirty trick of bipedal locomotion. 

 

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jordy Brouwer said:

 

I'm not sure what my favorite part of that is;

 

"you get past Bruno Fernandes" (?)

 

or 

 

"You somehow get past Casemiro". 

 

Probably "you somehow get past Casemiro". 

 

We managed it all because we learned the dirty trick of bipedal locomotion. 

 

 

 

 

 

Fernandes is already stood on the wrong side of you yappin at the ref.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Barrington Womble said:

 

The thing with this game though, is it was effectively won and lost in a 21 minute spell. It was pretty even before we scored - in fact just dull even, nothing was happening despite Gary Neville's Drury's words that it was an open game. Then from 35-56 mins, we wiped the floor with them. And it was game over and we were happy to let them have the ball. So the built up both possession stats and attempts on goal. If zirkzee had scored either of those big chances rashford put on a plate for him, the pattern of the game may have changed. But they kept wasting the chances they could create and as the score was 0-3, it felt there was no real jeopardy when they got those chances. 

 

It was just a case of let them have a bit of the ball, huff & puff, don't do anything silly ourselves, save energy and avoid injuries. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a really even game if you ignore the 3 goals, or Mo cross that was nearly tapped in at the far post. Or Mo dancing round them and nearly making it four 30 seconds after the third. Or Dom not taking the shot and spurning a tap after that. Really even game

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Carra_is_legend said:

 

It was just a case of let them have a bit of the ball, huff & puff, don't do anything silly ourselves, save energy and avoid injuries. 

Yeah, I agree..but what I'm saying is if they're just trying to use stats to prove the game is even, it will appear even - because at 0-3 the game wasn't real. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, manwiththestick said:

I reckon a lot of them are contorting themselves into sticking with ETH as they are absolutely terrified that the INEOS crew are gonna bring in Southgate.

They should welcome Southgate with open arms. At least they’d have a recognised style of play.  Boring as fuck but recognisable.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

It doesn't look like he's that good at it but I think at some stage enough of their players that are capable of playing well might help him keep his job. Or maybe it's just me hoping that it'll carry on like this for a while longer.

That Four Four Two bloke doing the tactics video on the match thread made a couple of interesting points: we were tactically set up better than them, but when (as inevitably happens) something happened that wasn't in anyone's tactical playbook, our players were switched on to make something positive out of it, while theirs ambled around scratching them arses.

 

If one player isn't mentally prepared, that's on him; if all of them are clueless, that's on the manager.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TheHowieLama said:

 

It was near iconic and a good move and set the tone for the match from the get go for me.

 

They just ran around more early on - they never did much with the ball. We shut it down after the third.

Indeed. A fair chunk of their passing stats will be side-to-side in their own half, because we were a few goals up and not letting them have a route forwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

That Four Four Two bloke doing the tactics video on the match thread made a couple of interesting points: we were tactically set up better than them, but when (as inevitably happens) something happened that wasn't in anyone's tactical playbook, our players were switched on to make something positive out of it, while theirs ambled around scratching them arses.

 

If one player isn't mentally prepared, that's on him; if all of them are clueless, that's on the manager.

 

One of klopp's big things was wanting the players to solve problems themselves on the pitch. Many managers think they have to do all the thinking, remember the Rodgers days? If things weren't going right, he could be tweaking formation 3 or 4 times per half. The players didn't have a clue where they were or what they were supposed to do. Hopefully Slot has the same approach as I think our players ability to work things out has been a main feature for years I think. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...