Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Should we sign him?   

169 members have voted

  1. 1. Should we sign him?



Recommended Posts

Taking the blinkers off but it's a great bit of business to get someone like that at age 22. The idea of rival fans going on about the money involved is truly desperate stuff. The shite paid £44m for Sigurdsson. This is the world we live in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

Taking the blinkers off but it's a great bit of business to get someone like that at age 22. The idea of rival fans going on about the money involved is truly desperate stuff. The shite paid £44m for Sigurdsson. This is the world we live in. 

They are going on about money 'cos that is the only thing they can talk about right now. They *know* we are ace, they *know* we are awesome in transfers, they *know* Klopp will most likely turn Nunez into a world class forward and above all they are pissed off that their happiness on Mane leaving didn't last 5 mins. 

 

The initial sum of £64m is less than the cost of Grealish, Pogba, McGuire, Lukaku (twice), Sancho, Havertz, Dias and Nicolas fucking Pepe. If we end up paying the full add on cost of £21m it would mean we win shit loads over the next 5 years. 

 

So......a bit of perspective, eh...... 

  • Upvote 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Colonel Bumcunt said:

Spurs, Arsenal, and Chelsea played a low block. 

It's not just lower table teams. 

Madrid played a low block for a long time. 

Exactly. After the Spurs game, the crucial Spurs game, Klopp was reduced to complaining about that style of play. I don't know how or why this new state of denial came in, with its argument that if only we find a way to beat the top teams we'll creep ahead. We didn't lose out to City because we failed to beat them (they failed to beat us and still won it!). We lost out because STILL we drop too many points against the teams that drop deep. Thiago clearly helped, as his absence proved as much as his presence did, but we still need to deal with this problem. City do it because they hold on to the ball and are prepared to bore everyone to tears for 90+ minutes. We don't play that way, and we always leave the door open for a breakaway goal against us. That's still the concern. We shouldn't fetishise what happened against the top rivals - that can happen any season.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Carra_is_legend said:

They are going on about money 'cos that is the only thing they can talk about right now. They *know* we are ace, they *know* we are awesome in transfers, they *know* Klopp will most likely turn Nunez into a world class forward and above all they are pissed off that their happiness on Mane leaving didn't last 5 mins. 

 

The initial sum of £64m is less than the cost of Grealish, Pogba, McGuire, Lukaku (twice), Sancho, Havertz, Dias and Nicolas fucking Pepe. If we end up paying the full add on cost of £21m it would mean we win shit loads over the next 5 years. 

 

So......a bit of perspective, eh...... 

My favourite is how we’re "paying more than city paid for Haaland"....

 

Beauts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, an tha said:

My favourite is how we’re "paying more than city paid for Haaland"....

 

Beauts.

Plus City have given Haalands entire family jobs.

 

His nan is City's new hygiene consultant on £4m per year. Not sure how effective she'll be as she been dead 10 years.

 

  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...