Jump to content
AngryOfTuebrook

Summer 2022 Transfer Thread

Recommended Posts

Just now, TD_LFC said:

61b0f0d3844294291b0b9bfb1ca34e42.gif

 

Seriously though it's Real Madrid tactics 101, charm the player so he declares he wants to join then when you have the player convinced talk the transfer fee down with the selling club believing the player has made up his mind.

Yeah, they do it well. We should be doing the same in this era. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Harry Squatter said:

Few reports saying Real Madrid are refusing to pay the €80m for Tchouameni. 

Doubt we'd pay that either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Harry Squatter said:

Few reports saying Real Madrid are refusing to pay the €80m for Tchouameni. 

I wouldn't read too much into that. It's most likely Madrid being cunts again by agreeing terms with the player and use that to reduce the transfer fee.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, 3 Stacks said:

I agree with your overall point 100%, I do think though that Haaland might just be good and prolific enough that he might transcend the need to fit City's style completely. He's a pretty special player, I think it remains to be seen. 

 

I also think Mane has done a phenomenal job at providing some of the technique and nuance we require from centre forward, to keep our play fluid. Jota to me does a bad job at this pretty much all the time and that's his main problem, although obviously he has other qualities, notably his play in the penalty area.

 

But yeah, it's hard to believe you'd see the best teams of the decade, with technical strikers like Suarez, Benzema, City's teams who have all technical forwards or play a midfielder up front, Messi playing false 9, forwards who are wizards all over the pitch, and then our best teams with Firmino up front, and then conclude we just need someone up top who is quick and who finishes chances. You need way more than that.  

Suarez was and Benzema is way more prolific than Firmino ever was for for us. Not a like-for-like comparison.

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, aRdja said:

Suarez was and Benzema is way more prolific than Firmino ever was for for us. Not a like-for-like comparison.

The point wasn't the goal scoring, it was how complete and technically gifted those forwards I listed are/were and how important that is to their team. Those strikers skills transcend goalscoring and make/made their team better in all aspects. Firmino has been the same. Real Madrid won the European Cup one season where Benzema scored 12 goals in all comps. They won La Liga one year when he scored 11 in the league. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 3 Stacks said:

The point wasn't the goal scoring, it was how complete and technically gifted those forwards I listed are/were and how important that is to their team. Those strikers skills transcend goalscoring and make/made their team better in all aspects. Firmino has been the same. Real Madrid won the European Cup one season where Benzema scored 12 goals in all comps. They won La Liga one year when he scored 11 in the league. 

Yeah, and like with Mane/Salah now, most people were in awe of Ronaldo's goalscoring stats, thinking they needed a better striker up top so they could add even more goals to their team. Turns out not everyone in a front three can score 30 a piece...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, 3 Stacks said:

I agree with your overall point 100%, I do think though that Haaland might just be good and prolific enough that he might transcend the need to fit City's style completely. He's a pretty special player, I think it remains to be seen. 

 

Oh, I doubt he'll be a flop, unless his injury woes continue.

 

He won't fit their style when playing against the low block teams, that's for sure. He might get them a goal or two they wouldn't normally get due to his sheer pace, physicality and movement for those famed tap-ins (Sterling normally scores those anyway). He'll be like a bull in a China shop in those games.

 

It's in the games against us, Arsenal (if they continue to play like they do now), Brighton, possibly the Mancs (depending on the Ten Hag project) and in a couple of the European games where he'll be able to make a positive difference to what they already have. Get him in transition with De Bruyne feeding him the ball and even Virgil and Konate will be tested. It will be a hell of a lot easier to play through their press though.

 

In total, I think the difference will be marginal. I've made the same point repeatedly since his name first came up being linked with us. He wasn't a right fit for us, hopefully he's the second coming of Ibrahimovic for Pep.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frenkie De Jong seems like is being pushed out by Barca. 

 

Will probably end up at Man United with his boy Ten Hag, but I wonder if we'd consider him. We rarely seem to act on opportunities in the market, and this is an opportunity, so probably not. Unless we've been following him long term.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, 3 Stacks said:

Frenkie De Jong seems like is being pushed out by Barca. 

 

Will probably end up at Man United with his boy Ten Hag, but I wonder if we'd consider him. We rarely seem to act on opportunities in the market, and this is an opportunity, so probably not. Unless we've been following him long term.

Isn't it our M.O?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TD_LFC said:

Isn't it our M.O?

What? Opportunities? Nah, usually we go for long term targets, not good players who suddenly become available due to circumstances.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 3 Stacks said:

What? Opportunities? Nah, usually we go for long term targets, not good players who suddenly become available due to circumstances.

Maybe we're talking at cross purposes then because I don't consider a player we're not looking at and haven't scouted as an opportunity, it's a risk.

 

Diaz was an opportunity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, 3 Stacks said:

What? Opportunities? Nah, usually we go for long term targets, not good players who suddenly become available due to circumstances.

Like Thiago? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, 3 Stacks said:

Frenkie De Jong seems like is being pushed out by Barca. 

 

Will probably end up at Man United with his boy Ten Hag, but I wonder if we'd consider him. We rarely seem to act on opportunities in the market, and this is an opportunity, so probably not. Unless we've been following him long term.

He's on like £180k a week at Barca, i don't think we'd go that high for him. Excellent player though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 24/05/2022 at 20:57, Harry Squatter said:

Few reports saying Real Madrid are refusing to pay the €80m for Tchouameni. 

You might say that's above our prince range, about 30m euros Tchouameni

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Latest Round Up

  • Last Match Report

  • Popular Now

  • Popular Contributors

  • Posts

    • Gerrard in this team would make Kevin De Bruyne look like a bum. He'd be the best player in the league by a mile.   Tactical discipline wouldn't be a problem for him because he wouldn't be playing for a defensively obsessed manager. I get where the whole "Gerrard isn't tactically disciplined" thing comes from, its because Rafa spoonfed that to people off the record for years.   Stevie was too swashbuckling to play centre mid in his system, but he'd be unreal playing in Klopp's.   Another factor in Gerrard's supposed tactical weakness was that he was often playing in shit teams where he needed to force the issue because nobody else would be capable of it. No point him sitting midfield and watching nothing happen in front of him. Of course he's not going to do that. Doesn't mean he has no tactical discipline, it just means he's a winner.   He played right back and was brilliant. He played holding midfielder and was brilliant. He played right midfield and was brilliant. He's since become a manager who builds his teams on being organised and defensively sound.   Gerrard in a midfield with Fabinho and either Thiago or Hendo would be un-fucking-believable.   And besides, there'd be nothing stopping us going with the same 4-2-3-1 he played in when he was just behind Torres.   If I could add any player from our history to this current team it's Gerrard. Even ahead of Suarez, and you know how much I love Suarez.
    • he newly appointed Chancellor and Warwickshire MP Nadhim Zahawi has created a sprawling £100 million property portfolio, along with his wife and their companies, the Mirror has reported. Mr Zahawi, who represents Stratford-upon-Avon, previously worked as Education Secretary, and before that rose to prominence as vaccine minister, helping to deliver the Government's rollout of the jab. © PA Nadhim Zahawi leaving 10 Downing Street following the resignation of Rishi Sunak yesterday His new role comes following the resignation of Rishi Sunak who quit as Chancellor having lost confidence in Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Mr Zahawi came to the UK aged nine after being born in Iraq to a Kurdish family, who fled the regime of Saddam Hussein.   Believed to be one of the richest politicians in the House of Commons, estimates of his net worth range from £30 million to £100 million. He has refused to confirm the amount, previously telling the Telegraph: "I've been very lucky in life." He helped found the polling company YouGov and along with his wife, owns a huge property empire, which includes a country home and stables, a £20 million London townhouse, a number of high-street properties and an industrial estate. A Mirror investigation previously found that more than half were purchased while Mr Zahawi was serving as a Government minister. Seven of the properties bought for over £10 million are mortgage-free, and two more were partially-funded by £10 million loans from Mr Zahawi's wife Lana. Read more: Chancellor Nadhim Zahawi: Everything you need to know about the Warwickshire MP The Zahawis personally own five residential properties, worth at least £17 million - three in London, one in Warwickshire (where his constituency is) and one in Dubai. The home near Warwick, a country house with stables, was bought for £875,000 in 2011. One of Mr Zahawi's firms purchased the £3.5 million Chunnel industrial estate in Ashford Kent, by the Eurotunnel train station, and his wife Lana Zahawi now owns two superstores, including a £6.3 million plot home to a giant Co-op and car park in St Neots, Cambridgeshire. Another company controlled by Mr Zahawi owns £18 million worth of land containing an Asda megastore in Brierley Hill, West Midlands. Since it was bought four years ago, its value has increased by £1.25 million. There is no suggestion that he has breached the Ministerial Code. In 2013 it was reported that Mr Zahawi had claimed the livery's £5822.27 heating bill on expenses, which he said he had done by mistake and repaid. At the time he posted a statement on his website saying: " Since last week's coverage of my energy bills I have been looking into them further and can confirm that all claims for heating fuel relate purely to my second home. " However I have made a mistake with my electricity claims. On investigation I have discovered that the electricity supply for a mobile home located in the stable yard and for the stables themselves was linked to my house. " Whilst a meter was installed in the stable yard I have only been receiving one bill, it was wrong to assume I was receiving two and to have not checked this sooner. I am mortified by this mistake and apologise unreservedly for it. " I will obviously be paying back any money that was wrongly claimed immediately and have already contacted IPSA [Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority] regarding the correct procedure."
    • Keir starmer please take note 
    • Well, if it wasn't for all those Jews he'd beaten up, I'd agree. That and the tattoo of a swastika is a dead giveaway.    I mean, it's crazy. I very much think he handled the whole situation poorly from a managerial perspective as LOTO, and I feel the report backed that up, but 'dangerous anti-Semite'. Okay bud. The entire thing has run rampant, and there's barely a middle road to tread where he's concerned. He's either the saviour of all things, or he's the devil. It's a myth. The fuckin' lot of it.
×