Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Alternative 'rona thread


Pureblood
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Nelly-Torres said:

I wonder if Dr. McCullough has any new information for us when he speaks at this upcoming Q Anon type event? 

FIXCWFuWYAgf3S-.jpeg

FIXC328XwA8RmQq.png

You've gone for a refreshing "far right wacko" angle. 

 

Must. See. Everything. Through. Left. Right. Schism. Must. See. Everything. Through. Left. Right. Schism. Must. See. Everything. Through. Left. Right. Schism. Must. See. Everything. Through. Left. Right. Schism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Pureblood said:

I don't make the rules, but if it was up to me I'd ban the vaccine for everyone under 25 until global vaccine equity has been achieved.

 

For over 25s, it would be voluntary and carry clear warnings about the risks.  Any injuries resulting from vaxx fully guaranteed by the state (jointly with the manufacturer) by way of financial compensation for the injured, or for their next of kin for fatalities caused by the vaccine. 

 

No mandates, no consequences for refusal, everyone lives happily ever after under a no mandate rainbow.

There's a difference between saying that vaccinating kids should be carefuly executed, if at all, that there shouldn't be vaccine mandates, and that men under 30 might not want to take the Moderna vaccine, and saying the vaccines are inherently dangerous and citing clear grifters non stop. The former is clearly something we can discuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pureblood said:

You've gone for a refreshing "far right wacko" angle. 

 

Must. See. Everything. Through. Left. Right. Schism. Must. See. Everything. Through. Left. Right. Schism. Must. See. Everything. Through. Left. Right. Schism. Must. See. Everything. Through. Left. Right. Schism.

Okay. Whatever you say. You're welcome to put all your faith in Lying Malone and Dr Q all you want. I won't stop highlighting that these people are a bit weird. STOP TRYING TO CENSOR ME! 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys love this thread it's undeniable. The gang's all here because it's way better than the boring original thread. Be careful though because the memes are powerful. You may start to question authoritah and have logical thoughts that trouble you when you compare them to your swallowed narrative. 

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Iceman said:

You guys love this thread it's undeniable. The gang's all here because it's way better than the boring original thread. Be careful though because the memes are powerful. You may start to question authoritah and have logical thoughts that trouble you when you compare them to your swallowed narrative. 

They used to sell tickets to watch the lunatics at Bedlam. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Iceman said:

It works well being the differentiator. It's purpose is to actually stop transmission not just reduce symptoms.

Nope.

 

The CDC - " IPV does not stop transmission of the virus."

 

WHO - "IPV prevents infection, but it does not stop transmission of the virus."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TD_LFC said:

Nope.

 

The CDC - " IPV does not stop transmission of the virus."

 

WHO - "IPV prevents infection, but it does not stop transmission of the virus."

 

Polio vaccine provides lifelong immunity whereas the Covid-19 vaccine gives only temporary protection.

 

Polio vaccine kicks covid vaccine's ass. Fact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Nelly-Torres said:

Okay. Whatever you say. You're welcome to put all your faith in Lying Malone and Dr Q all you want. I won't stop highlighting that these people are a bit weird. STOP TRYING TO CENSOR ME! 

Not at all, please continue to post. It's all welcome. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Iceman said:

Polio vaccine provides lifelong immunity whereas the Covid-19 vaccine gives only temporary protection.

In countries where Polio is virtually eradicated, otherwise, ya know, you wouldn't need the booster (taking you to 6 vaccines instead of the usual 5) for high risk countries.

 

Seems it's quite easy for people to mis-speak, first you said it prevents transmission but now you didn't really mean that you just meant it prevents the serious effects.

 

" the vaccination does not prevent asymptomatic infection and further spreading of polioviruses."

 

Any other pivots?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TD_LFC said:

In countries where Polio is virtually eradicated, otherwise, ya know, you wouldn't need the booster (taking you to 6 vaccines instead of the usual 5) for high risk countries.

 

Any other pivots?

Immunity is what the Covid vaccine doesn't provide. It's why they changed the definition of vaccine and immunity. 

 

Polio Vaccine Effectiveness and Duration of Protection | CDC

Polio Vaccine Effectiveness and Duration of Protection Vaccine Effectiveness Two doses of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) are 90% effective or more against polio; three doses are 99% to 100% effective. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TD_LFC said:

In countries where Polio is virtually eradicated, otherwise, ya know, you wouldn't need the booster (taking you to 6 vaccines instead of the usual 5) for high risk countries.

 

Seems it's quite easy for people to mis-speak, first you said it prevents transmission but now you didn't really mean that you just meant it prevents the serious effects.

 

Any other pivots?

 

Credit where it's due, you make a valid point regarding the dosing regime. 

 

Still, the polio vaccine has decades of transparent safety data and proven efficacy, whereas the Covid vaccine does not so it's a bit like comparing peaches with asparagus. 

 

Green Star awarded to TD_LFC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pureblood said:

Credit where it's due, you make a valid point regarding the dosing regime. 

 

Still, the polio vaccine has decades of transparent safety data and proven efficacy, whereas the Covid vaccine does not so it's a bit like comparing peaches with asparagus. 

How did it get the decades of data?

 

Hell the live polio vaccine (OPV?) used to give people polio in very very rare cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

"Anti-science." Around 13mins he says the vaccines are "very, very safe." Is he going to do a video on adverse reactions? An anti-science video of Fauci, FDA, Walenksy and Biden clips? Long term effects that we can't possibly know yet? Myo/pericarditis in younger males? Maybe he can do a video of the agreements Pfizer have made with governments around the world too, it could be titled "redacted."

 

Of course he won't because youtube would probably start taking his fucking videos down and he'd have to move to rumble or elsewhere.

 

He can fuck off. You can do a biased takedown of anyone speaking for 3 hours.

 

Have fun supporting authoritarian Macron too as he's "pissing off" unvaccinated.

It seems pretty well argued to me, confirmation biased notwithstanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TD_LFC said:

 

Who did what now?

ToryOfTuebrook bottled it when challenged to look at the new definitions of vaccine and immunity given by the CDC. Covid vaccine would not pass the vaccine definition given to the polio vaccine, and neither would it adhere to the definitions required for immunity. Tory ran away from the thread when asked to research this for himself and to answer the question as to why the new definitions were given. Perhaps you will have more balls and tell us why you think they changed these definitions specifically for the Covid vaccines. Go on, give it the college try. 

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SasaS said:

It seems pretty well argued to me, confirmation biased notwithstanding.

Robert Malone isn't an island.  He has a group of 16,000 scientists backing him.

 

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/humanitys-whistleblower-dr-robert-malone-sounds-the-alarm/article_e9c05e86-6ccf-11ec-9417-bbc21429de9c.html

 

The Chief Architect of mRNA platform technology is blowing the whistle on the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. And if he is correct, we are all in grave danger – and 16,000 of his fellow scientists agree with him.

 

https://doctorsandscientistsdeclaration.org/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...