Alternative 'rona thread

[Pureblood]

9 minutes ago, Jack the Sipper said:

Not in the articles you post, as I've pointed out to you already. These are just random cases if people having heart problems with no discernable cause given, but because uou believe there's a link between the vaccines and heart problem you stick up every report, regardless of the cause.

 

 

It's because there's a correlation, timed with mass vaccination.  Correlation doesn't equal causation but we should be allowed to ask the question without fear of being shouted down by noisy intolerant people such as yourself. 

[Pureblood]

4 minutes ago, Jack the Sipper said:

 

How about the fact that, in most of the articles he posts, no cause is given, therefore it's completely misleading to link them to vaccines as he does? The importance you claim to place of the truth and facts and evidence is clearly selective.

It's more misleading to claim that the vaccine plays no part when it's known to cause permanent damage to the heart muscles (myocarditis). 

[Jack the Sipper]

1 minute ago, Pureblood said:

It's because there's a correlation, timed with mass vaccination.  Correlation doesn't equal causation but we should be allowed to ask the question without fear of being shouted down by noisy intolerant people such as yourself. 

Ask questions? If only. All you do on here is make claims without evidence. 

 

And you might want to check out what correlation means. 

[Pureblood]

1 minute ago, Jack the Sipper said:

Ask questions? If only. All you do on here is make claims without evidence. 

 

And you might want to check out what correlation means. 

I know what correlation means. For example, there's a high correlation between people who've been triple jabbed and people who are unable to think for themselves. lol

[Jack the Sipper]

2 minutes ago, Pureblood said:

It's more misleading to claim that the vaccine plays no part when it's known to cause permanent damage to the heart muscles (myocarditis). 

Right, so if you fight one misleading claim with some of your own that makes it ok? Two bob shyster.

 

still, at least we're inching closer to an acknowledgment that you knowingly mislead people. Even if only a handful of cunts on here are stupid enough to believe you.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

44 minutes ago, Pureblood said:

It's not an implication - the vaccines are known to cause heart inflammation, strokes and so on at a lower rate than Covid-19, which the vaccines are known to protect against. 

.

[Red Phoenix]

5 minutes ago, Jack the Sipper said:

How about the fact that, in most of the articles he posts, no cause is given, therefore it's completely misleading to link them to vaccines as he does? The importance you claim to place of the truth and facts and evidence is clearly selective.

 

The importance I place on arguing here after just having my head fucked up for about two hours on wordle is selective too (I managed to get the bastard in the end but it was the worst one I've ever done.)

 

It's Pureblood's thread, if he wants to post cases of people having health problems after we've had months of scapegoating and media denial of problems I'm not opposing him doing that.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

11 minutes ago, Pureblood said:

It's because there's a correlation, timed with mass vaccination.  Correlation doesn't equal causation but we should be allowed to ask the question without fear of being shouted down by noisy intolerant people such as yourself. 

Is there?

 

Bearing in mind that cherry-picked anecdotes are not data, the first question we should be allowed to ask, without fear of being shouted down by noisy intolerant people, is whether there is an increase in heart problems and whether this correlates with mass vaccination.

[Pureblood]

5 minutes ago, Jack the Sipper said:

Right, so if you fight one misleading claim with some of your own that makes it ok? Two bob shyster.

 

still, at least we're inching closer to an acknowledgment that you knowingly mislead people. Even if only a handful of cunts on here are stupid enough to believe you.

Like I say, the truly misleading position is to pretend that the vaccines cause no harm. 

[Pureblood]

2 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Is there?

 

Bearing in mind that cherry-picked anecdotes are not data, the first question we should be allowed to ask, without fear of being shouted down by noisy intolerant people, is whether there is an increase in heart problems and whether this correlates with mass vaccination.

Discussed on previous pages with forumite Bjornebye. 

[Carradona]

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

Taylor Hawkins has been claimed by the anti-vaxxers. 
 

Weird cunts. 

[Pureblood]

4 minutes ago, Nelly-Matip said:

Taylor Hawkins has been claimed by the anti-vaxxers. 
 

Weird cunts. 

Don't know about Taylor Hawkins specifically but there are certainly a lot of famous people and athletes/professional sportspersons collapsing in mysterious circumstances.  It's almost like there's some other force at work, I wonder what it could be...

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

Just now, Pureblood said:

Don't know about Taylor Hawkins specifically but there are certainly a lot of famous people and athletes/professional sportspersons collapsing in mysterious circumstances.  It's almost like there's some other force at work, I wonder what it could be...

6 minutes ago, Nelly-Matip said:
 

Weird cunts. 

Speak of the devil…

[Pureblood]

1 minute ago, Nelly-Matip said:

Speak of the devil…

lol M8

 

Where has Nelly-Fauci gone, do you not pray to the Lord Pfauci anymore? 

[Clem H Fandango]

29 minutes ago, Pureblood said:

Don't know about Taylor Hawkins specifically but there are certainly a lot of famous people and athletes/professional sportspersons collapsing in mysterious circumstances.  It's almost like there's some other force at work, I wonder what it could be...

Maybe it was all the smack he used to take....

[Pureblood]

Just now, Clem H Fandango said:

Maybe it was all the smack he used to take....

Maybe it's Maybelline. 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

1 hour ago, Pureblood said:

Discussed on previous pages with forumite Bjornebye. 

tl;dr 

Did you provide any data?

[Pureblood]

Just now, AngryOfTuebrook said:

tl;dr 

Did you provide any data?

I'm not repeating myself, certainly not for someone as obtuse as you. 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

2 minutes ago, Pureblood said:

I'm not repeating myself, certainly not for someone as obtuse as you. 

I looked through the last five pages or so and there's nothing there. I couldn't be arsed looking further, because I strongly suspect (based on your previous efforts on this thread) that you haven't provided any data.

 

Prove me wrong.

[Pureblood]

2 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

I looked through the last five pages or so and there's nothing there. I couldn't be arsed looking further, because I strongly suspect (based on your previous efforts on this thread) that you haven't provided any data.

 

Prove me wrong.

Find out for yourself. 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

2 minutes ago, Pureblood said:

Find out for yourself. 

I've wasted too much time finding out that you are a truth-averse cuntbubble. 

 

Prove me wrong.

[Pureblood]

1 minute ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

I've wasted too much time finding out that you are a truth-averse cuntbubble. 

 

Prove me wrong.

I've nothing to add to what I replied to Stig with. I'm not repeating myself for your benefit. 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

Just now, Pureblood said:

I've nothing to add to what I replied to Stig with. I'm not repeating myself for your benefit. 

OK.

 

Please show me where you answered Stig, because I'm fucked if I'm scrolling through 180 pages for it.

[Pureblood]

2 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

OK.

 

Please show me where you answered Stig, because I'm fucked if I'm scrolling through 180 pages for it.

No.