Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, VERBAL DIARRHEA said:

The game has gone, money is talking louder than ever and the only way to deal with it is to not be arsed. Not one thing City have won has any meaning despite what their fans and pundits and journalist say. Cheats.

Not enough people feel this way though. And with a plethora of journalists being "kind" to the cunts, for want of a better word, and with other teams fans who have proper rivalries with others teams who City will be a better option to win things, the status quo will be maintained as they won't complain. Bitters would take City relegate them every day of the week than for us to win a throw in. They're more than delighted for City to stop us winning stuff. Cunts all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So City get a penalty when Kavanagh is looking directly at it , we don't get one when Tierney is looking directly at Jota getting fouled so were exactly is the clear and obvious error principle coming into play where var is concerned I'm genuinely asking a question here 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tj hooker said:

So City get a penalty when Kavanagh is looking directly at it , we don't get one when Tierney is looking directly at Jota getting fouled so were exactly is the clear and obvious error principle coming into play where var is concerned I'm genuinely asking a question here 

Isnt 'clear and obvious' a Mike Riley interpretation for the use of VAR and not FIFA's?

 

The original idea of VAR was a chance to look again at incidents refs had missed during play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's fucking infuriating. What's the fucking point. Unlimited funds and generous officials can only be contended with for so long. Eventually they'll just win fucking everything.

6 points clear now. Even with a game in hand, that's going to be really tough, especially given teams don't bother against them usually, and try their hardest against us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, El Rojo said:

Teams going into games against City not believing that they’ll get anything out of the game are as big a problem as City themselves in all of this. 

City batter almost everyone all the time, though. Their style of play is so dominant. The only way 99% of clubs can beat them is to score from almost every chance and defend like your life depends on it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...