Summer 2021 transfer thread.

[John102]

[Daisy]

I've already confirmed we won't be buying him

[cloggypop]

20 minutes ago, Daisy said:

I've already confirmed we won't be buying anyone ever again

 

[Elite]

21 minutes ago, Daisy said:

I've already confirmed we won't be buying him

Yeah but you make TheDrowningMan look like an eternal optimist.

[VERBAL DIARRHEA]

24 minutes ago, Daisy said:

I've already confirmed we won't be buying him

Who? We don’t buy that many do we?

[Strontium]

13 hours ago, Dr Nowt said:

Updated to cover all dockers’ accounts.

 

 

Shithouse hunt.

[elvis]

37 minutes ago, Daisy said:

I've already confirmed we won't be buying him

And?

[Jose Jones]

Pretty obvious we aren’t interested in Saul, I think.

[Strontium]

Stumping up the money to buy Saul would require a Damascene conversion from our owners, that's for sure.

[Elite]

It's about time this transfer window thingy got moving. I preferred the Houllier days where he'd buy as much shite as could find.

[dockers_strike]

8 minutes ago, Elite said:

It's about time this transfer window thingy got moving. I preferred the Houllier days where he'd buy as much shite as could find.

I thought there'd be a pick up in activity after the teams got knocked out of the Euros but it still seems quiet.

[Bjornebye]

 

 

[joe_fishfish]

If Kane goes to Man City things might start moving, but until then, everyone's skint.

[dockers_strike]

city need to open their wallets then, the shithouse cunts!

[Scott_M]

Seem’s we might not be the only club struggling - the green and gold scarves will be back with a vengeance. 

[dockers_strike]

1 minute ago, Scott_M said:

Seem’s we might not be the only club struggling - the green and gold scarves will be back with a vengeance. 

Oh no! Sell to buy! Say it aint so! Oh, it's not just us!

[Scott_M]

25 minutes ago, dockers_strike said:

Oh no! Sell to buy! Say it aint so! Oh, it's not just us!

No doubt it’ll be pointed out they spent £85m on Sancho but ignore we’ve spent £36m on Konaté or complain they’ve spent more than us.

[sh#t waffle]

12 minutes ago, Scott_M said:

No doubt it’ll be pointed out they spent £85m on Sancho but ignore we’ve spent £36m on Konaté or complain they’ve spent more than us.

In fairness, that difference isn't nothing is it? Sancho will be on significantly higher wages than Konate, and the difference in fee would pay for a Wijnaldum replacement in addition before we needed to sell to buy.

[Scott_M]

Looks like Saul could be off, if it was ever on.

 

[Scott_M]

2 minutes ago, sh#t waffle said:

In fairness, that difference isn't nothing is it? Sancho will be on significantly higher wages than Konate, and the difference in fee would pay for a Wijnaldum replacement in addition.

While true, it could be also argued they earn more than us & the Glazers needed to put their hand in their pockets.

[3 Stacks]

Saul for Griezmann was quite obvious as soon as that rumour came up. Barca have previous with these kinds of nonsense player swap deals.

[El Dangerous]

Saul’s kidney exploded, you need a bit of that.

[dockers_strike]

21 minutes ago, Scott_M said:

No doubt it’ll be pointed out they spent £85m on Sancho but ignore we’ve spent £36m on Konaté or complain they’ve spent more than us.

True. Sancho is relatively untried. Yes, he's done good at Dortmund but didnt they have some issues with him? I didnt see anything in him during the Euros so united are, in my opinion, taking a big risk with him. Was it £73m Dortmund settled on? I know they wanted £85m but was sure the papers were trumpeting united getting him for less?

[TheHowieLama]

Messi signs w Barca - 5 year - until he will be 40. Pay cut.

[TheHowieLama]

Barca paid 120mil for Griezmann and 140 mil for Coutinho in the space of what - 6 months?

 

They will be lucky to end up w Saul and 30 - 40 mil for them now.