Quantcast
US Election 2020 Thread - Page 269 - GF - General Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
Bjornebye

US Election 2020 Thread

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, sir roger said:

I should be chuckling at that, but it just seems too sad.

I know, it's like mocking the disabled almost. These people aren't stupid for the most part though, just really credulous, like religious zealots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 20/01/2021 at 16:48, Section_31 said:

Anyone seen that shit about Kellyanne Conway going apeshit at her kid? Unreal, grotesque bitch.

Last night she posted a topless image of the girl on Twitter as "revenge" porn.

 

She is 16.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure about the states, but even having the picture would get your name added to the sex offenders register in this country, nevermind putting it on twitter.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, TheHowieLama said:

Last night she posted a topless image of the girl on Twitter as "revenge" porn.

 

She is 16.

That's unreal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, TheHowieLama said:

Last night she posted a topless image of the girl on Twitter as "revenge" porn.

 

She is 16.

Wait!!  What! She did this on her own daughter ? Over what a row they had.

that’s mental. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Mark M said:

Wait!!  What! She did this on her own daughter ? Over what a row they had.

that’s mental. 

 

Her daughter now saying she doesn't believe it was her mum, and that she must have been hacked. Riiiiiight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 25/01/2021 at 16:12, Rico1304 said:

I’ve read some stuff saying it’ll be difficult for Dominion to win, but if they get to discovery then Rudi may settle.  

What exactly do you have to do in the US to actually libel somebody ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, sir roger said:

What exactly do you have to do in the US to actually libel somebody ?

 

If Rudy gets off they may as well throw the existing laws in the bin. Cunt was crying on news channels being watched the world over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Rick Sanchez C-137 said:

 

Her daughter now saying she doesn't believe it was her mum, and that she must have been hacked. Riiiiiight

Just been reading up on it now. Sounds like her lawyer dad told her to make that statement otherwise her mum could be looking at charges and potential jail time.

the old oh something inappropriate came from my phone quick say you were hacked

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, sir roger said:

What exactly do you have to do in the US to actually libel somebody ?

Obviously no idea, but they explain a little in the clip below, starts approx 50 seconds in.

 

Basically they need to prove it wasn't a one off/slip, it wasn't true and the tough one is you knew what you were saying wasn't true. 

Dominion are using the fact he said "fraud" where and whenever possible, apart from when in a court of law where there would be consequences, points to him knowing it was a load of shite.

On 25/01/2021 at 15:45, Scooby Dudek said:

CNNs take on it doesn't sound good for Rudy;

 

 

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, sir roger said:

What exactly do you have to do in the US to actually libel somebody ?

I think it hinges on proving malice, and that’s not how we understand the word. I’ll try and dig out the tweets I read. 
 

Here we are;  https://davidallengreen.com/2021/01/why-the-first-paragraph-of-the-lawsuit-brought-by-dominion-voting-systems-against-rudolph-giuilani-is-a-splendid-piece-of-legal-drafting/

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, TheHowieLama said:

Last night she posted a topless image of the girl on Twitter as "revenge" porn.

 

She is 16.


Pics?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Rico1304 said:

I think it hinges on proving malice, and that’s not how we understand the word. I’ll try and dig out the tweets I read. 
 

Here we are;  https://davidallengreen.com/2021/01/why-the-first-paragraph-of-the-lawsuit-brought-by-dominion-voting-systems-against-rudolph-giuilani-is-a-splendid-piece-of-legal-drafting/

Makes more sense now , and I know the Yanks never stop going on about the right to free speech , but it seems odd that a very high-profile person can basically blather extremely damaging shite without any proof, and the affected people have no restitution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • But @Denny Crane the governing model of Liverpool hasn't changed since the club's founding has it?  The club has always been owned by a variety of rich people and governed by a board made up of these rich people.  In the past there have been different majority shareholders, right now it's FSG.   I think there would have been an outside chance of majority fan ownership at the price that Moores sold at - plus he might have been persuaded into it rather than looking to maximise his cash out - but it would have needed to be managed by the club itself and not competing supporters groups.  Unfortunately at the time the club board and Parry had no vision whatsoever, and couldn't even keep the season ticket waiting list on a computer.  Never mind being able to organise a membership scheme.    The only way we're getting a different ownership model now is if the club goes bust or you have a time machine.
    • Nice to see Timmy Cahill in the back there 
    • I thought a new corporate structure was required but here he walks through the steps.                                                   
    • Usual Twatter rumours that Jota is injured as wasn’t pictured in training and could be out for Utd game too....Sad thing is they’re usually true
    • Lee, Labour have had a bit on football ownership in their election manifestos for around a decade. The focus has been on good governance and supporters trusts to get stakes in football clubs. The sound argument put forward has long been that football is incapable of regulating itself. It needs people whose sole aim isn't growth to have an influence or veto. This is why we are where we are today. A sport with Oligarchs, Hedge Fund owners and Sheikhs dictating the terms of how football evolves.     
  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Contributors

  • top casino sites
  • new UK casino
×