Quantcast
US Election 2020 Thread - Page 238 - GF - General Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
Bjornebye

US Election 2020 Thread

Recommended Posts

I realise I’m well behind the curve in this thread but shocking as last week was, it was also fucking hilarious.

 

That guy dressed as a Minator was hysterical. His interview was even better, what a crackpot.

 

Just imagine the US giving it the holier than now attitude if this happened in a Middle East country or somewhere. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Trumo said:

 

Stealing my 2019/20 material makes you a

 

 

Terrorism. Racism. Unhinged Madness. Paedophilia. 

Idiocy. Shithousery.

Anger.

Childishness. Ugliness. Nazism. Twattery.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More conspiracy theory from the loons. The Georgia runoffs were stolen, folks.
 


 

...and Pelosi is mad as hell and she’s not gonna take it anymore, because her laptop was stolen during the breach.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 08/01/2021 at 12:20, Brownie said:

CNN interviewed the lad who filmed it yesterday. He said the police told the rioters not to attempt to go through that door or they’d be shot.

 

She ignored them and got shot.

I’m intrigued - CNN interviewed a ‘lad who filmed it’ and he’s being distinguished from the rioters, even though he was running with the rioters. Surely he was a blinking rioter?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I absolutely guarantee if you got all these fringe media wankers and paid them not to do this stuff, their desire to liberate the country from the satanic paedophile communist hordes would dry up pretty quickly. 

 

Steve Bannon was perfect on that score. Right wing twat that's spewed nothing but bile about Mexico and China, gets arrested for swindling Elmer Fudds out of their meth money to "fund a wall" and is found on a Chinese billionaire's boat.

 

It's the same over here, Farage with his German passport, Hartley Brewer, Toby Young, all these twats who've profited from stoking bile.

 

The media outlets which give them a platform purely for social media and Internet shares, coupled with the abject laziness and idiocy or Joe Six-pack, are the real problem.

 

A self contained industry of endless twattery complete with producers, middlemen and consumers.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

3% of Democrats strongly support?

 

 

tenor-32.gif

 

 

7% OF UKIP voters also voted remain...

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-ukip-7-cent-remain-vote-yougov-poll-a7100186.html

 

I have no answers for the world anymore, only questions I dread the answers to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SasaS said:

Bezos isn't Dave. Dave is Parler. Bezos is server Dave is paying to host the forum.

And tournament will end in arrests, that I am certain of.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Gnasher said:

That's going down the pan. Fucking Dutch..I warned people not to trust em and they go and do this..

 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/11/foreigners-face-ban-from-amsterdams-cannabis-cafes

I just hope this doesn't mean they end up in Leiden instead. Stay on the train to Den Haag blerts. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Barrington Womble said:

As I say, that's what antitrust laws are for. As I mentioned in my other post, I personally think there needs to be some consideration in breaking some of these companies up because they are too big. I'm not sure it's quite right there should be a company with turnover the equivalent of the GDP of a mid-sized EU nation. But that just isn't the problem here. The problem is Parler and the cunts who post on it. 

 

I think it's a bit of both really but I can understand that it's probably not the best time to talk about it right now. Maybe when Trump is gone and this has settled down a bit it'll be easier though.

 

I've been checking on what Glenn Greenwald has been saying recently too and he's not having any of it really. It's probably best that he's not in this thread as there'd be a decent bit of rage directed at him I think. This is a good example of facebook being the broken pile of shit that it is though :

 

 

At the same time I don't think this would've gone down too well here (shit nested twitter tweets, it's the bottom tweet i'm linking) :

 

 

This isn't going to blow over any time soon though and these corps need looking at eventually. And maybe Parler will get their own servers sorted out then....get raided by feds or something? I suppose we'll find out soon enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Pidge said:

AWS Acceptable Use Policy (amazon.com)

 

No Illegal, Harmful, or Offensive Use or Content

 

You may not use, or encourage, promote, facilitate or instruct others to use, the Services or AWS Site for any illegal, harmful, fraudulent, infringing or offensive use, or to transmit, store, display, distribute or otherwise make available content that is illegal, harmful, fraudulent, infringing or offensive. Prohibited activities or content include:

  • Illegal, Harmful or Fraudulent Activities. Any activities that are illegal, that violate the rights of others, or that may be harmful to others, our operations or reputation, including disseminating, promoting or facilitating child pornography, offering or disseminating fraudulent goods, services, schemes, or promotions, make-money-fast schemes, ponzi and pyramid schemes, phishing, or pharming.
  • Infringing Content. Content that infringes or misappropriates the intellectual property or proprietary rights of others.
  • Offensive Content. Content that is defamatory, obscene, abusive, invasive of privacy, or otherwise objectionable, including content that constitutes child pornography, relates to bestiality, or depicts non-consensual sex acts.
  • Harmful Content. Content or other computer technology that may damage, interfere with, surreptitiously intercept, or expropriate any system, program, or data, including viruses, Trojan horses, worms, time bombs, or cancelbots.

 

Terms of service:

 

1.4. In connection with your use of the Services, you are responsible for maintaining licenses and adhering to the license terms of any software you run. If we reasonably believe any of Your Content violates the law, infringes or misappropriates the rights of any third party, or otherwise violates a material term of the Agreement (including the documentation, the Service Terms, or the Acceptable Use Policy) (“Prohibited Content”), we will notify you of the Prohibited Content and may request that such content be removed from the Services or access to it be disabled. If you do not remove or disable access to the Prohibited Content within 2 business days of our notice, we may remove or disable access to the Prohibited Content or suspend the Services to the extent we are not able to remove or disable access to the Prohibited Content. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we may remove or disable access to any Prohibited Content without prior notice in connection with illegal content, where the content may disrupt or threaten the Services or in accordance with applicable law or any judicial, regulatory or other governmental order or request. In the event that we remove Your Content without prior notice, we will provide prompt notice to you unless prohibited by law. We terminate the accounts of repeat infringers in appropriate circumstances.

 

Good luck, fash.

 

 

I'm not trying to argue with you, I saw this a minute ago though and remembered your post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

 

I'm not trying to argue with you, I saw this a minute ago though and remembered your post.

When was the last point in history that all our main means of communication weren't in private hands?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, cloggypop said:

I just hope this doesn't mean they end up in Leiden instead. Stay on the train to Den Haag blerts. 

Leiden it is then fellas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a load of fucking bollocks. Nobody is stopping them talking, Trump can talk any time he wants as can the senators. All the need to do is have a press conference. But they won't, because they can't spout their shite without it being questioned. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Social media platform as moral guardian.

Almost as absurd as political party as moral guardian.

 

Hope we murder the Mancs on Sunday.

Can I say that?

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, No2 said:

When was the last point in history that all our main means of communication weren't in private hands?

Exactly.

 

The other thing is that users with these abhorrent views are being kicked off because the majority of other users, and much of society, find their views unacceptable.  In a sense it's self-policing although of course ultimately up the the private company to decide who stays and who goes.  But I would think that if these views were not fringe and were acceptable to most other users, so if society was skewed the opposite way, they would be fine to carry on being horrible people.  But that's not the case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

I think it's a bit of both really but I can understand that it's probably not the best time to talk about it right now. Maybe when Trump is gone and this has settled down a bit it'll be easier though.

 

I've been checking on what Glenn Greenwald has been saying recently too and he's not having any of it really. It's probably best that he's not in this thread as there'd be a decent bit of rage directed at him I think. This is a good example of facebook being the broken pile of shit that it is though :

 

 

At the same time I don't think this would've gone down too well here (shit nested twitter tweets, it's the bottom tweet i'm linking) :

 

 

This isn't going to blow over any time soon though and these corps need looking at eventually. And maybe Parler will get their own servers sorted out then....get raided by feds or something? I suppose we'll find out soon enough.

Great recent habit of greenwald to make a salient point in the cuntiest way possible. 

 

Maybe should have just revisited this old example of the dangers of the state and SM controlling the narrative (thread): 

Although, to be fair, I believe he was friends with Franco so might be a bit close to the bone.

 

He could also remind people at any time that Trump put an opponent of net neutrality in charge of the FCC and that internet traffic in the US at a much more fundamental level is more open to corporate control thanks to him.

 

Edit: they could quite easily regulate terms of service to make them less vague, but I find it unlikely they would do so. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, skaro said:

 

Social media platform as moral guardian.

Almost as absurd as political party as moral guardian.

 

Hope we murder the Mancs on Sunday.

Can I say that?

 

 

Well...no. This is the GF.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Nelly-Torres said:

Screenshot_20210111_235039.jpg

Hahaha

 

I can't get all organic food in prison. Fucking hell. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • You must mean big league because there aren't many bigger clubs around than his current team 
    • His stats for stealing a fucking living are absolutely sky-high.
    • the more i watch of thiago is he looks a slightly less mobile version of gini. i know everyone says thiago's passing is great, but i am convinced that's just because he plays no look passes, i don't see any benefit over what gini contributes. maybe i am wrong, but i reckon we got thiago as gini's replacement, but we were able to fund it early by selling brewster and using lallana's wages and if barca had bid enough for gini, we'd have snatched their hands off. thank fuck they didn't. no way he's here next year though sadly. let's hope we get someone to add value using gini's wages - fuck knows where the fee will come from. 
    • I think you're right but I wish you weren't.    I don't  get why the club paid what it did for Thiago along with his wages yet not sort out a deal for Gini when there's very little age difference and he's already on the books.   He's a cracking player Gini, fit,  reliable and hard working. It doesn't make sense to me that he hasn't been offered a deal.   Because of his importance to the team, as far as I'm concerned,  it's a no brainer.
    • I've said I think if VVD stayed fit, this wouldn't be the problem it is.    As for this complete drop off, it has coincided with playing Henderson in defence and his place going to thiago - if I recall correctly Henderson's 1st game at centre back was Southampton, which was thiago's 1st start and this was our 1st defeat of the run we've had this year. That was the point our midfield stopped, except for the brief support it got from milner, when we actually picked up some points. So we dipped off when we 1st lost VVD, but the collapse went once we doubled down on destroying the midfield to support the defence. However, that didn't need to happen. We could have gone out and found someone and got it all signed and sealed like we did with VVD 3 years previous and he was ready to go. Once they waited till Gomez got injured, then everyone in the market place would fuck us. But it didn't take a genius to see he'd get injured, it's what he does.   It's massively bad planning. Going into the season the risk with vvd was there to see. We should have had plans in place in case this happened. We didn't need to act on it, but it's basic common sense if you're taking a gamble is you protect your position if it goes wrong. It shouldn't have taken both Gomez and Matip to get injured to see a reaction.    As for you comment about a rebuild - well we clearly need one soon as it's an aging squad. Assuming the players come back from injury at the level they were at before, I say carragher is right and we need 3 right through the spine. 2 of them should just be replacements for origi and Gini. The only one net new should be at centre back - and while unlikely, perhaps he's already at the club. 
  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Now

  • Popular Contributors

  • top casino sites
  • new UK casino
×