Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Greatest Male Solo Artist - Round 1 - Michael Jackson vs Elvis Presley


Bjornebye
 Share

Greatest Male Solo Artist - Round 1 - Michael Jackson vs Elvis Presley  

70 members have voted

  1. 1. Greatest Male Solo Artist - Round 1 - Michael Jackson vs Elvis Presley


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 21/10/20 at 11:46

Recommended Posts

Elvis for me, Suspicious Minds came on my shuffle earlier and had to replay it 2/3 times. MJ was great but, as a mid-80s kid I tend to associate him with my early years and don't think I've ever really listened to him consistently since i was like 7. 

 

I want you back is one of my favourite ever songs, but that's not a solo tune so doesn't count. 

 

The "TLW is racist" whinges are very funny and not tiresome at all.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pidge said:

Elvis for me, Suspicious Minds came on my shuffle earlier and had to replay it 2/3 times. MJ was great but, as a mid-80s kid I tend to associate him with my early years and don't think I've ever really listened to him consistently since i was like 7. 

 

I want you back is one of my favourite ever songs, but that's not a solo tune so doesn't count. 

 

The "TLW is racist" whinges are very funny and not tiresome at all.

Whose lawn you burning a cross on tonight mate? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheHowieLama said:

U wot??

You don’t think Michael Jackson was absolutely huge? Best selling album of all time, global tours of 100,000 punter venues, practically owned MTV in its heyday, mobbed everywhere he went. Michael Jackson was iconic mate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elvis was ridiculously big for his time, but that was pre-globalisation and pre-global mass media. It wasn’t possible for an artist to be truly global in his day like it was in Michael Jackson’s. MJ was huge in Asia and Africa as well as Europe and America. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Paul said:

Elvis was ridiculously big for his time, but that was pre-globalisation and pre-global mass media. It wasn’t possible for an artist to be truly global in his day like it was in Michael Jackson’s. MJ was huge in Asia and Africa as well as Europe and America. 

That's actually an argument for Elvis.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Paul said:

Elvis was ridiculously big for his time, but that was pre-globalisation and pre-global mass media. It wasn’t possible for an artist to be truly global in his day like it was in Michael Jackson’s. MJ was huge in Asia and Africa as well as Europe and America. 

All well and good if that added up to anywhere near the saturation Elvis had on the "global market" of his time.

 

He is easily the biggest musical star ever.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SasaS said:

That's actually an argument for Elvis.

It’s not because it’s not possible to know how Elvis would’ve fared if he’d been born twenty years later. His iconic status was indelibly linked to the birth of rock and roll. We can speculate about what he might’ve done, but we know what MJ did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheHowieLama said:

All well and good if that added up to anywhere near the saturation Elvis had on the "global market" of his time.

 

He is easily the biggest musical star ever.

The smaller global market. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Paul said:

You don’t think Michael Jackson was absolutely huge? Best selling album of all time, global tours of 100,000 punter venues, practically owned MTV in its heyday, mobbed everywhere he went. Michael Jackson was iconic mate. 

I'm in a smallish city in the Netherlands and there's at least one bloke that goes around dressed as Elvis constantly. There's also a full time gig putting on Elvis impersonator. There's one Michael Jackson but that's just a mate of mine from Belfast who happens to share the name. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SasaS said:

You think that global market wouldn't have embraced Elvis?

Probably, but we don’t know do we? The 80s of Jackson’s pomp was a far more musically diverse era. Elvis dominated what was almost a mono-culture. Jackson dominated the most varied and biggest decade in musical history. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elvis was a truly great artist by any definition. I just think timing was a far bigger factor in his status than Michael Jackson’s. He also had fewer obstacles to overcome. Jackson was only allowed on MTV as their first ever black artist because his label threatened to pull their entire roster of artists if the channel’s racist policy wasn’t retracted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...