I'm fully expecting Burnley to concede at least three in their next game. 

That Kane penalty situation was itself an extended interpretation of the offside law which said that the striker was onside if a defender played the ball.  That was supposed to mean deliberately passing or kicking the ball (I.e. Something clear, understandable and in accordance with the spirit of the game) but was now idiotically ruled to mean any touch by a defender except a purely unconscious deflection. The City decision extended the idiocy to allow an attacker to chase back and pressure a defender from an offside position on the basis that he wasn't seeking an advantage if the defender then misplayed the ball. The decision was wrong but rather than admit it they've now changed the interpretation again.  But Kane would still be onside if it happened again as he was just goal hanging rather than closing a defender down.  

Can you captain him next week?

Zaha must have the same hair stylist as Miley Cyrus.