Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Keir Starmer


rb14
 Share

Recommended Posts

He may not be very charismatic and I feel he isn't all that great in the debates and I don't think he is a particularly good or inspiring campaigner....But I do think he will be a very good prime minister - I think he'll bring integrity to the job, realism to the job and honesty, things that have been missing for too long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, skend04 said:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jun/22/starmer-growth-plan-doomed-access-eu-markets-economists

 

Today's little speech about not rejoining, not going into a customs union blah blah blah is going to bite him on the arse soon enough. 

 

It's the economy stupid!


 

The conversation starts post election, he has 2/3 years to make the case, and they will, in some degree.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:


 

The conversation starts post election, he has 2/3 years to make the case, and they will, in some degree.

 

He'll take the same approach as the social scientists did to lockdowns, make it so the public are demanding it and then when it comes, act like it was our idea all along.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:


 

The conversation starts post election, he has 2/3 years to make the case, and they will, in some degree.

 

I think it's being so definite about it then times it has come up. It just adds to the 'dishonest' tag when it eventually does become the elephant in the room. But still, I'd rather have that debate under a Labour government than Tory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

Not a hope in hell Starmer and Reeves will try to rejoin the EU and I don't blame them. 

I think you are right, and I dont blame them either. But I suspect not for the same reasons as you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Labour will create a watchdog with “real teeth” that has the power to prosecute and fine companies that breach the rights of their employees as part of its plans to strengthen workers’ rights.

Angela Rayner, the party’s deputy leader, told the Observer that she would create a new body, the Fair Work Agency, to oversee her proposals. She said that millions of workers could be losing out on basic rights as a result of underenforcement.

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Section_31 said:

Labour will create a watchdog with “real teeth” that has the power to prosecute and fine companies that breach the rights of their employees as part of its plans to strengthen workers’ rights.

Angela Rayner, the party’s deputy leader, told the Observer that she would create a new body, the Fair Work Agency, to oversee her proposals. She said that millions of workers could be losing out on basic rights as a result of underenforcement.

Horrible bastards. Red tories.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sir roger said:

Apparently there is no 'dignity in accepting state handouts.

No mention of how much 'dignity' there is in companies avoiding tax.and going offshore.

Oh that's totally fine! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Section_31 said:

Labour will create a watchdog with “real teeth” that has the power to prosecute and fine companies that breach the rights of their employees as part of its plans to strengthen workers’ rights.

Angela Rayner, the party’s deputy leader, told the Observer that she would create a new body, the Fair Work Agency, to oversee her proposals. She said that millions of workers could be losing out on basic rights as a result of underenforcement.

Like the General Secretary of UNISON said last week, we've had 14 years of having the door shut in our face; now we'll have a seat at the table.  I've got no love for Starmer's Labour, but that change shouldn't be underestimated.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Like the General Secretary of UNISON said last week, we've had 14 years of having the door shut in our face; now we'll have a seat at the table.  I've got no love for Starmer's Labour, but that change shouldn't be underestimated.

 

"Labour in the pockets of the unions!" etc. etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

"Handouts" 

 

He has no qualms on punching down. 

 

 

 

Apart from the word 'handout', most of that article is about him wanting to give people the opportunity to earn a decent wage and the dignity of being able to do so. Obviously that's different for people who are unable to work, but I don't see alot wrong with it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rushies tash said:

 

Apart from the word 'handout', most of that article is about him wanting to give people the opportunity to earn a decent wage and the dignity of being able to do so. Obviously that's different for people who are unable to work, but I don't see alot wrong with it.

 

If you're off work through sickness or illness and you've payed national insurance it's hardly a handout. Obviously people would take a decent job with decent pay if they could, that should go without saying. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

 

If you're off work through sickness or illness and you've payed national insurance it's hardly a handout. Obviously people would take a decent job with decent pay if they could, that should go without saying. 

 

Like I said, the word 'handout' is probably misjudged, but given that he was talking to the Telegraph, then he's clearly aware of his audience. "We will never turn our back on people who are struggling" is all you need to take from that article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rushies tash said:

 

Like I said, the word 'handout' is probably misjudged, but given that he was talking to the Telegraph, then he's clearly aware of his audience. "We will never turn our back on people who are struggling" is all you need to take from that article.

 

OK, hope you're right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...