Quantcast
Keir Starmer - Page 99 - GF - General Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
rb14

Keir Starmer

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Nummer Neunzehn said:

80k twitter followers and her PayPal link in her description. Fair enough, seems legit. 

 

She doesn't work, how else is she supposed to pay the country club fees.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, 1892-LFCWasBorn said:
 

I've noticed a huge backlash on Starmer and Labour in the past 2 weeks from Labour supporters. Honeymoon period well and truly over.

 

Labour really need to get their shit together as people are getting fed up of them sitting back and doing fuck all. 

She’s another grifter.  Sob stories every few

months, typed from the jacuzzi of the country club.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Stront19m Dog™ said:

 

She doesn't work, how else is she supposed to pay the country club fees.

I sense there’s a story about the country club?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah seen a few bad things about that Rachel Swindon. Seems to be loved by the ultra-Corbyn crowd but isn't she getting thousands via her go-fund-me for being a carer but someones found her facebook ordering hot-tubs and stuff? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last I saw around twelve months ago she was a carer or something related. In a 2018 article in Buzzfeed it was reported her husband has Fibromyalgia and the below is from the end of last year. Are we doing the stick of people with disabilities have to suffice on bread and water and just exist etc. I know there was a thing a while back where people said she was a man. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Bruce Spanner said:

I mean she only has a distinction in PPE from Oxford, an MA in Social Policy from Edinburgh and a PhD from LSC in economics, so feel free to reduce her to cruel caricature, she’s obviously thick and not somebody we need on ‘our’ side...

Boo fucking hoo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Duff Man said:

Suspect she may be banished from the front bench and replaced with Reeves at some point.

Well, your hit-rate at the moment isn’t that high, so I’ll not put money on it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Rico1304 said:

She’s another grifter.  Sob stories every few

months, typed from the jacuzzi of the country club.  

I was disappointed when I found out she looks nothing like her Twitter cartoon profile pic.

 

 

image.png

https://www.buzzfeed.com/markdistefano/heres-the-woman-behind-britains-most-divisive-twitter

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, RedKnight said:

Wouldn't take advice from Rachael Swindon if she told me water was wet. She's of the "fuck off and support the Tories" vibe, and then everyone did.

Yep, diamond studded, gold plated bell end.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot investigative Twitter ops on Rachael Swindon, just as before.  Not the same investigations on the Tory-supporting Twitter figures, unsurprisingly.  Apparently, if Swindon is a fraud then by proxy the whole Labour movement is a fraud...  

 

Knock yourself out lads.  Spend more time digging on Swindon, spend ALL your time, she's the key, honest...

 

On another tangent, the Corbyn years are being re-written now as a failure, but the hard-line left movement almost won an election.  It wasn't, he won more seats than Brown or Miliband.  Brown lost 97 seats, it was a disaster.  But bear in mind, John Major lost 171 seats in 1997.

 

There is a tidal element to elections, and that tide is affected by ripples from elsewhere.  Trump losing the election this year will create a huge ripple here for the Tories.  A US trade deal could be dependent on some critical UK concessions, a deal that Trump would have given us easily will not be as straightforward with Biden.

 

Also, the nasty rhetoric from Trump was always nice, WASP, background music for the Tories, but that music will stop, and their closest right-wing allies in international politics will be Bolsanaro, or Modi.  Not as easy to sell to the public as Trump, especially for the xenophobic little Tory supporter bastards. 

 

Oh, by the way, Brexit.

 

It's a footnote at the moment, which is where they want to keep it.  That will bite, at Christmas. 

 

Hey look,  I wrote all of that and had all those thoughts without having to check if Racheal Swindon agreed with it or not. It's almost like she's totally inconsequential to the left-wing movement. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That’s all a bit ‘you don’t have to succeed to be a success, he is a success’. It isn’t being rewritten as a failure, it was a failure. ‘Almost winning an election’ is another way of saying he lost an election. Then when he almost won an election by losing an election and getting nowhere near a majority, he went on to a crushing defeat, eventually leaving the party 21pts adrift. No matter how you write that, it ain’t a success. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Nummer Neunzehn said:

That’s all a bit ‘you don’t have to succeed to be a success, he is a success’. It isn’t being rewritten as a failure, it was a failure. ‘Almost winning an election’ is another way of saying he lost an election. Then when he almost won an election by losing an election and getting nowhere near a majority, he went on to a crushing defeat, eventually leaving the party 21pts adrift. No matter how you write that, it ain’t a success. 


But, the Media???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And Bumcunt's absolutely spot on about Rachel Swindon, there. Despite her 80k followers she - and all the other lefty Twitter accounts that get people on this thread so upset - still have absolutely nowhere near the amount of influence that the media do, and whatever they say about Starmer is ultimately pretty meaningless. You can disagree with them/hate them/think they're cunts etc but the reality is they have barely any impact at all on things that actually matter like votes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like I’m capable of having an issue with more than one thing at a time. I can have a concurrent dislike of both the media and with fact-hating, partisan liars on twitter. So, thanks all the same, but it’s not an either/or. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Duff Man said:

And Bumcunt's absolutely spot on about Rachel Swindon, there. Despite her 80k followers she - and all the other lefty Twitter accounts that get people on this thread so upset - still have absolutely nowhere near the amount of influence that the media do, and whatever they say about Starmer is ultimately pretty meaningless. You can disagree with them/hate them/think they're cunts etc but the reality is they have barely any impact at all on things that actually matter like votes.

She doesn’t upset me I just think she’s a dickhead.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Nummer Neunzehn said:

I feel like I’m capable of having an issue with more than one thing at a time. I can have a concurrent dislike of both the media and with fact-hating, partisan liars on twitter. So, thanks all the same, but it’s not an either/or. 

Never said it was, and you're welcome to dislike them as much as you want but, as I said, it would be a mistake to think that the two have anywhere near the same amount of power or influence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×