Keir Starmer

[Gnasher]

3 minutes ago, Strontium said:

 

Congratulations on discovering what a real poll looks like, and that it shows Muslim support for Labour at 72%, not 40% as claimed in your voodoo poll.

Both show support "falling" which was the point being made, that they were taken at different times and didn't produce identical figures is irrelevant.

[Strontium]

1 minute ago, Gnasher said:

Both show support "falling" which was the point being made, that they were taken at different times and didn't produce identical figures is irrelevant.

 

Just to repeat, the only poll that has any relevance is the one done by actual pollsters. Not one that you, me, or anybody else with an internet connection could have partaken in. The issue is not whether or not support among one demographic is falling or not, but the weight being given to a meritless, valueless survey because it gives you a stick to beat Starmer with.

[Gnasher]

11 minutes ago, Strontium said:

 

Just to repeat, the only poll that has any relevance is the one done by actual pollsters.

Just to repeat. The one given by "actual pollsters" shows support falling, as does the one conducted on twitter.

Quote

Not one that you, me, or anybody else with an internet connection could have partaken in. The issue is not whether or not support among one demographic is falling or not,

Yes that is the issue, the issue of certain demographs are withdrawing their support for the Labour Party.

Quote

but the weight being given to a meritless, valueless survey because it gives you a stick to beat Starmer with.

The weight of the "actual poll' that you are so concerned about confirms the findings of the survey you had doubts about..

 

Your nonsense quip about using the findings as a stick to beat Starmer is unworthy of a meaningful reply. Especially as I've posted a poll (hope it's meets your criteria) showing Starmer/Labour a healthy 10 points up on the tories.

 

 

[Strontium]

1 minute ago, Gnasher said:

Just to repeat. The one given by "actual pollsters" shows support falling, as does the one conducted on twitter.

Yes that is the issue, the issue of certain demographs are withdrawing their support for the Labour Party.

The weight of the "actual poll' that you are so concerned about confirms the findings of the survey you had doubts about..

 

Your nonsense quip about using the findings as a stick to beat Starmer is unworthy of a meaningful reply.

 

A poll which shows support at 72% is not "confirmed" by one which claims it is barely half of that.

 

72%. 40%. Not the same.

 

And even if the voodoo poll somehow had stumbled upon a correct figure by accident, it still wouldn't mean its methodology had any value at all.

 

Stop posting nonsense and treating it as if it has any credibility.

[Gnasher]

3 minutes ago, Strontium said:

 

A poll which shows support at 72% is not "confirmed" by one which claims it is barely half of that.

 

72%. 40%. Not the same.

 

And even if the voodoo poll somehow had stumbled upon a correct figure by accident, it still wouldn't mean its methodology had any value at all.

 

Stop posting nonsense and treating it as if it has any credibility.

The only one posting nonsense is you, both show support falling which was the original point.

[Bjornebye]

20 minutes ago, Strontium said:

 

Just to repeat, the only poll that has any relevance is the one done by actual pollsters. Not one that you, me, or anybody else with an internet connection could have partaken in. The issue is not whether or not support among one demographic is falling or not, but the weight being given to a meritless, valueless survey because it gives you a stick to beat Starmer with.

You bastard are you questioning the legitimacy of the GF Tournaments?! 

[Strontium]

10 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

You bastard are you questioning the legitimacy of the GF Tournaments?! 

 

Depends if my picks win or not.

[Chris]

Thought Starmer was excellent in his response. He's assumed the role of the public's voice on this quite well.

[PestiRed]

19 minutes ago, Chris said:

Thought Starmer was excellent in his response. He's assumed the role of the public's voice on this quite well.

Excellent speech from Starmer although unfortunate that hardly any of the country will see any more than a few seconds of it

[Gnasher]

48 minutes ago, Chris said:

Thought Starmer was excellent in his response. He's assumed the role of the public's voice on this quite well.

Yeah you cant argue with that performance, he got the mood and tone spot on as well as the words.

[Bjornebye]

55 minutes ago, Chris said:

Thought Starmer was excellent in his response. He's assumed the role of the public's voice on this quite well.

Spot on 

34 minutes ago, PestiRed said:

Excellent speech from Starmer although unfortunate that hardly any of the country will see any more than a few seconds of it

Yep 

[Harry's Lad]

1 hour ago, Chris said:

Thought Starmer was excellent in his response. He's assumed the role of the public's voice on this quite well.

I'm not Starmers biggest fan, but he absolutely nailed it there.

[Gnasher]

 

 

[Numero Veinticinco]

 

[Arniepie]

He nails him there tbf

[Brownie]

Yeah it was very good, delivered in the right tone too.

[KMD7]

21 minutes ago, Brownie said:

Yeah it was very good, delivered in the right tone too.

Yeah absolutely.

[Numero Veinticinco]

Mr. Speaker, to govern this country is an honour, not a birthright; it is an act of service to the British people, not the keys to a court to parade to your friends.

 

Whoever wrote that needs to take a bow. That really struck me. 

[Gnasher]

2 hours ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

 

 

Dominic Rabb spent the whole of that speech looking like a puzzled dog watching a conjurer performing a magic trick.

[Anubis]

Good address by Starmer. Just lacked an encore of pulling Johnson over the divide and nailing his balls to the counter with a hammer and some 9 inchers.

[Bjornebye]

4 hours ago, Anubis said:

Good address by Starmer. Just lacked an encore of pulling Johnson over the divide and nailing his balls to the counter with a hammer and some 9 inchers.

Blackford did that bit 

 

 

But again as someone said, most won’t even see or hear it. 

[Harry's Lad]

2 hours ago, Bjornebye said:

Blackford did that bit 

 

 

But again as someone said, most won’t even see or hear it. 

He's a bit too pious at times but Blackford was superb there. Told it like it is and refused to retract. Good on him.

This rule about not being allowed to call a liar a liar in the house is ridiculous.

 

 

[magicrat]

Bang on from Starmer

I endorse every word he spoke 

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

Has Starmer made membership of Amnesty International another reason to expell Labour party members yet? 

[Gnasher]

 

5 hours ago, Nelly-Fauci said:

Has Starmer made membership of Amnesty International another reason to expell Labour party members yet? 

I agree, I said at the time, i thought he boxed himself into a a corner when diplomacy was still an option.