Keir Starmer

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

11 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

JVL have already apologised you pathetic slime.

To dampen the flames. He was filming and photographing audience members despite requests not too. Play silly games, win silly prizes etc. 

 

Now, piss up a rope, fuckstick. University Challenge is on. That's more important than humouring a pathetic trolling weapon like you. 

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

Just now, Captain Willard said:

Are you saying that she is making it all up ? The domestic abuse, the death threats etc ? Why would she do that ? 

I'm saying that, with all allegations, it's unproven until proof is provided. She could be doing an Ellman. 

[Rico1304]

4 minutes ago, Nelly-Torres said:

I'm saying that, with all allegations, it's unproven until proof is provided. She could be doing an Ellman. 

Why believe the women?  But when a man says he’s a woman we must believe him. There’s a word for that.  

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

Just now, Rico1304 said:

Why believe the women?  But when a man says he’s a woman we must believe him. There’s a word for that.  

Is that word Ricochattingshiteagain? 

[Strontium]

10 minutes ago, Nelly-Torres said:

To dampen the flames. He was filming and photographing audience members despite requests not too. Play silly games, win silly prizes etc. 

 

Of course they didn't want journalists documenting the fact that JVL were admitting people who had been expelled from Labour for being notorious racists.

 

Because if they didn't have evidential proof, people like you would be calling them liars. Indeed, you still are, despite a video of the incident and an apology from the organisers. 

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

3 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

Of course they didn't want journalists documenting the fact that JVL were admitting people who had been expelled from Labour for being notorious racists.

 

Because if they didn't have evidential proof, people like you would be calling them liars. Indeed, you still are, despite a video of the incident and an apology from the organisers. 

I'm not calling them liars. I'm calling you a liar. And a troll.

[Strontium]

2 minutes ago, Nelly-Torres said:

I'm not calling them liars. I'm calling you a liar. And a troll.

 

I mean, there's literally a video proving that I'm telling the truth.

 

But yeah, by all means continue to gaslight Jews, you've got a lot of practice doing that.

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

Just now, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

I mean, there's literally a video proving that I'm telling the truth.

 

But yeah, by all means continue to gaslight Jews, you've got a lot of practice doing that.

Stop playing the victim. Troll. 

[Strontium]

Ah, the "always the victim" chants are coming out now.

 

Disgusting.

[Bjornebye]

1 minute ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

I mean, there's literally a video proving that I'm telling the truth.

 

But yeah, by all means continue to gaslight Jews, you've got a lot of practice doing that.

Bang out of order 

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

1 minute ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

Ah, the "always the victim" chants are coming out now.

 

Disgusting.

I didn't say that. So please don't falsely attribute quotes to me. 

 

Victim. 

[Brownie]

Starmer’s a cunt then eh? 

[Creator Supreme]

1 minute ago, Brownie said:

Stronts acting the cunt then eh? 

 

[Brownie]

Just now, Creator Supreme said:

 

As I have repeatedly said, he’s a troll. I don’t know why people even waste their time with him.

[Strontium]

10 minutes ago, Brownie said:

As I have repeatedly said, he’s a troll. I don’t know why people even waste their time with him.

 

Just because you said it, don't make it true.

 

How fucking stupid would someone need to be to have read the exchange above and think that it was me who was the troll.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

53 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

Why believe the women?  But when a man says he’s a woman we must believe him. There’s a word for that.  

Is the word "obsessed"?

[AngryOfTuebrook]

49 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

Of course they didn't want journalists documenting the fact that JVL were admitting people who had been expelled from Labour for being notorious racists.

 

Because if they didn't have evidential proof, people like you would be calling them liars. Indeed, you still are, despite a video of the incident and an apology from the organisers. 

If only someone had livestreamed the event.

[Strontium]

2 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

If only someone had livestreamed the event.

 

My understanding is that streams of events don't generally train the cameras upon the audience. And if they did, then what was the objection to a journalist filming them too? Logic.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

6 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

My understanding is that streams of events don't generally train the cameras upon the audience. And if they did, then what was the objection to a journalist filming them too? Logic.

You'd have to ask the twat who bundled the journo (and who had nothing to do with the organisers) what his objections were.

Not much point asking people who weren't there and didn't watch it.

Logic.

[Strontium]

3 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

You'd have to ask the twat who bundled the journo (and who had nothing to do with the organisers) what his objections were.

 

Well it's obvious he didn't want anyone documenting the fact that he was at an officlal party fringe meeting despite him being expelled from Labour for racism.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

2 minutes ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

Well it's obvious he didn't want anyone documenting the fact that he was at an officlal party fringe meeting despite him being expelled from Labour for racism.

Pure speculation, but I'd also guess that a Jewish person branded anti-Semitic by the media might not be well-disposed to being filmed without permission by journalists.

Or he might have just been acting the cunt.

I neither know nor care.

[Strontium]

21 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Pure speculation, but I'd also guess that a Jewish person branded anti-Semitic by the media might not be well-disposed to being filmed without permission by journalists.

Or he might have just been acting the cunt.

I neither know nor care.

 

It's a bit more than "branded by the media".

 

Just to reiterate, Greenstein was suspended in 2016 and expelled from the Labour Party in 2018. Both of which happened when Corbyn was leader.

 

Naturally there will be a legitimate public interest in his attendance at a Labour Party official fringe meeting in 2021.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

9 hours ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

It's a bit more than "branded by the media".

 

Just to reiterate, Greenstein was suspended in 2016 and expelled from the Labour Party in 2018. Both of which happened when Corbyn was leader.

 

Naturally there will be a legitimate public interest in his attendance at a Labour Party official fringe meeting in 2021.

Being suspended from the Labour Party doesn't automatically mean a person is guilty. Quite a few people - including quite a few Jews - have been suspended on the flimsiest grounds. I've no idea what he was suspended for (and I don't care enough to do more than a cursory search) so I can't use that as a yardstick to judge his subsequent actions. I would, however, guess that he thinks that he's not anti-Semitic (notorious or otherwise) and he therefore probably sees himself (rightly or wrongly) as someone who has been smeared in the most horrible way.

 

Still not enough to justify assaulting anyone.

[sir roger]

How far has the Overton window shifted if Andy McDonald is being described as ' hard left ' on the BBC ?

 

I will say he has put a bit of chunk on since he was in Corry.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

9 hours ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

It's a bit more than "branded by the media".

 

Just to reiterate, Greenstein was suspended in 2016 and expelled from the Labour Party in 2018. Both of which happened when Corbyn was leader.

 

Naturally there will be a legitimate public interest in his attendance at a Labour Party official fringe meeting in 2021.

I've never been to a party conference, so I don't know how these things are organised; specifically, I don't know whether you have to show your badge at the door. (The JVL website never mentioned that.) If not, we're talking about an open meeting, which a Brighton-based member of the public attended.

 

https://www.jewishvoiceforlabour.org.uk/statement/33639/