Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Keir Starmer


rb14
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

The numbers are fucking savage. 

Labour imo need to start thinking out of the box now. The article below is one step they should be considering carefully, another is standing down candidates in seats where they cannot beat the tory but another candidate can. Another is reaching out to all wings of the party and try to get some sort of coalition/unified fighting force to go into the next election. Another idea is exploring the Scottish referendum issue and possibly offering them devolution or a vote. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

In what should have been an easy home run, I thought Starmer was terrible at PMQs today. I accept what people say about PMQs not really mattering to the man on the street, but if he can’t turn Cummings comments into a win, it’s not a great sign. 

When the PM isn't going to answer a single question and the speaker isn't going to make him then he's a bit stuck. There will be enough ammo in todays hearing and the public enquiry to hit them with down the line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Bjornebye said:

When the PM isn't going to answer a single question and the speaker isn't going to make him then he's a bit stuck. There will be enough ammo in todays hearing and the public enquiry to hit them with down the line. 

Yeah, the way he gets away with blustery bullshit answers is pretty gross. ‘What time is it’, ‘the time has come that we recognise how great we are at getting on with things’. 
 

Cool. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 22/05/2021 at 14:48, Duff Man said:

Christ, almost level-pegging in the 25-49 bracket, now.

Unfortunately the Asian vote seems to be drifting the same way which makes it more of a head scratch that in the week which should have been a home run for Labour (the report on tory islamifobia) that a few Labour shadow ministers talked yet again about Corbyn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

If only they stopped talking about Corbyn, everyone would flock to Labour. 

As I hinted in my above post if Labour mps spent less of their limited time on tv/radio talking about Corbyn and anti semitism they could have used that time attacking the Tories on something like Islamipobia.

 

It's becoming plain and obvious this apparent Labour party strategy of attacking all things Corbyn hasn't worked and is not going to work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Numero Veinticinco said:

If only they stopped talking about Corbyn, everyone would flock to Labour. 

The three big milestones that have affected Labour this past six months have been the vaccination program, Brexit and the ongoing Corbyn/anti semitism issue. 

 

Starmers policy on the first two is fairly sound (basically ignore it as the issue will fade) whilst his strategy on the Corbs issue is becoming a bit bizzare. He should take the same approach to Corbs as he has to Brexit and the Vac program ie fucking ignore it... how often does Boris Johnson and his team bring up Threasa May or David Cameron? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

Unfortunately the Asian vote seems to be drifting the same way which makes it more of a head scratch that in the week which should have been a home run for Labour (the report on tory islamifobia) that a few Labour shadow ministers talked yet again about Corbyn. 

Labour has made no real attempt to work with the massive proportion of Asian and Muslim voters who generally back the party , its interest in anti-racism appears to begin and end with anti-semitism. Lucky the many millions of Jewish voters will fill the gap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sir roger said:

Labour has made no real attempt to work with the massive proportion of Asian and Muslim voters who generally back the party , its interest in anti-racism appears to begin and end with anti-semitism. Lucky the many millions of Jewish voters will fill the gap.

The main twitter voices (all previous lifelong Labour supporters of course, ie Lipman, Baddiel, Oberma, Riley, Barber etc) came out in force for Starmer at the Hartlepool/Council elections, not one of them came out in support of him.  This strategy of appeasement is basically a waste of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even before the Corbyn anti-semitism stuff I could never understand why so many Labour mp's were in the LFI. Obviously , they should agree with the two-state solution and stay even-handed in dealings with Israel and Palestine , but nominally as a socialist  why would you want to be 'Friends' with one of the most right wing governments in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, sir roger said:

Even before the Corbyn anti-semitism stuff I could never understand why so many Labour mp's were in the LFI. Obviously , they should agree with the two-state solution and stay even-handed in dealings with Israel and Palestine , but nominally as a socialist  why would you want to be 'Friends' with one of the most right wing governments in the world.

Self preservation? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bjornebye said:

Self preservation? 

 

18 minutes ago, Gnasher said:

 

Just reading up on it and the oddity is it was a big thing with Blair but dipped under Milliband's leadership. It obviously snowballed  when Voldemort got voted in.

 

With referende to Gnasher's earlier post , it seems our supportive Jewish friends are after Jo Cox's sister now , which will obviously help.

 

Galloway now standing as an anti-Starmer candidate , and may take some leftist and brexit-labour voters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, sir roger said:

 

Just reading up on it and the oddity is it was a big thing with Blair but dipped under Milliband's leadership. It obviously snowballed  when Voldemort got voted in.

 

With referende to Gnasher's earlier post , it seems our supportive Jewish friends are after Jo Cox's sister now , which will obviously help.

 

Galloway now standing as an anti-Starmer candidate , and may take some leftist and brexit-labour voters.

Why are they after Jo Cox's sister?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gnasher said:

The main twitter voices (all previous lifelong Labour supporters of course, ie Lipman, Baddiel, Oberma, Riley, Barber etc) came out in force for Starmer at the Hartlepool/Council elections, not one of them came out in support of him.  This strategy of appeasement is basically a waste of time.

 

Good to know that the only reason to oppose racism is if there is votes in it. Oh, and of course, "money".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...