Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Keir Starmer


rb14
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

This question will help keep Labour out of power.  

 

It'll be brought up every time, like it will now with Davey, and needs to be properly addressed by adults and not screaming infants on the internet, so bring on the debate, do it in a rational and proactive way and try to draw conclusions and build bridges.

 

That wasn't the intention of posting the above though, it's more the point that some people are never happier than when they are outraged and will literally invent a problem to be outraged by.

 

Starmer, or anyone else expressing the views above, is now a misogynist as he said something was safe for a women, but how would he know 'he's not a woman'.

 

Jesus Christ, turn off the internet, go for a walk and have a long hard think about perspective.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

The party needs more leopard-print Lauras.

 

 

Does she not know she is perpetuating the idea that fur is a sustainable clothing option and not just cruelty for cruelties sake on our most endangered and precious animals?

 

I feel sick, she is supporting the trade in endangered animal fur industry.

 

How can she not see that she is part of the problem*

 

 

*I guarantee that that will appear in the comments section before the days out.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:

 

It'll be brought up every time, like it will now with Davey, and needs to be properly addressed by adults and not screaming infants on the internet, so bring on the debate, do it in a rational and proactive way and try to draw conclusions and build bridges.

 

That wasn't the intention of posting the above though, it's more the point that some people are never happier than when they are outraged and will literally invent a problem to be outraged by.

 

Starmer, or anyone else expressing the views above, is now a misogynist as he said something was safe for a women, but how would he know 'he's not a woman'.

 

Jesus Christ, turn off the internet, go for a walk and have a long hard think about perspective.

 

 

It’s not as if they didn’t know it was coming though.  They’ve had months to prepare an answer that included both sides of the argument and couldn’t.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:

 

Does she not know she is perpetuating the idea that fur is a sustainable clothing option and not just cruelty for cruelties sake on our most endangered and precious animals?

 

I feel sick, she is supporting the trade in endangered animal fur industry.

 

How can she not see that she is part of the problem*

 

 

*I guarantee that that will appear in the comments section before the days out.

Not on here ,  Bruce , ' the best possible threesomes ' possibly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:

 

Balls to that, these commies want equal reward for equal labour and that'd be a right ballache, literally and figuratively, if you get what I'm sayin'?

I was coming at it ( literally ) from the thought they wouldn't want me dominating them showing male patronage and hegemony at its worst , so I can lie back while they go at me like stoats in a sack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bruce Spanner said:

 

It'll be brought up every time, like it will now with Davey, and needs to be properly addressed by adults and not screaming infants on the internet, so bring on the debate, do it in a rational and proactive way and try to draw conclusions and build bridges.

 

That wasn't the intention of posting the above though, it's more the point that some people are never happier than when they are outraged and will literally invent a problem to be outraged by.

 

Starmer, or anyone else expressing the views above, is now a misogynist as he said something was safe for a women, but how would he know 'he's not a woman'.

 

Jesus Christ, turn off the internet, go for a walk and have a long hard think about perspective.

 

 

Bar for a few on twitter and journos like Owen Jones I'd wager the vast majority of the British public couldn't give a flying fuck about the subject. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fuck it. Bring on the Dungaree Revolution. If we have to make Skids, Stig and Starmer wear dungarees to have fairer taxation, I’m all for it. Obviously Turdseye already wears them. And I’m looking forward to seeing Bruce driving the vicar’s Bentley round while wearing dungarees.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...