Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Keir Starmer


rb14
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Denny Crane said:

Dan Jarvis, Yvette Cooper and Ed Miliband among others would lose their seat if the swing was far less than in the Hartlepool early Survation polling. If the BXP votes goes Tory like it is looking in Hartlepool. Will the BXP be like a gateway drug for former Labour voters?. Very early days but not looking good. 

Be a pity for Ed , that.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, RedKnight said:

Same old Labour. Always chasing itself in opposition.

They are completely unelectable, the leader can’t even do something as simple as visiting a church without the whole party ripping itself to pieces. I’ve honestly never seen anything like it, they are a complete fucking shambles.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, A Red said:

They say reformed smokers are the most vocal anti smokers. 

 

You were quite vocal about what activities and who you considered to be gay. Take superman for example -

 

Obviously when I said "gay" I was inferring he was a soft, mincey, spandex wearing twat. I don't really know which way he butters his bread to be honest but I'm willing to bet he drops anchor in poo bay. That's besides the point anyway. I just think he's lame.

 

Sure, that's definitely an example of what I'm talking about, and it's painful reading that back. I was 23 and clearly a clueless bell-end, prone to casual homophobia. What's your point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Section_31 said:

While I agree with you Neil, doesn't it also show how fucked up the current situation is? The Labour leader has got to navigate a minefield of going to a church that's espoused anti LGBT views with the ensuing fallout set to tie him and everyone else involved up for days if not weeks, yet meanwhile the country is led by a man who once called gay people 'tank-topped bumboys'. It's almost like the playing field is not entirely level.


It’s not hard to navigate a minefield if all the mines are marked with big red flags. All Labour has to do to avoid situations like this is to google the name of any organisation they’re considering visiting or working with, together with the words controversy, racism, homophobia, antisemitism and any other terms linked with kinds of discrimination and bigotry. It’s a few minutes extra work to add to all the hours of prep that should go into any partnership or PR event - not a big ask for a professional outfit.

 

There are lots of areas where the Tory easy mode makes it an uphill struggle for Labour, but this needn’t be one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

 

Did LGBT+ Labour ever publicly criticise the last leader for, let's be honest, continual hobnobbing with people and states who are hostile to gay rights?


I don’t know, if they didn’t then they should have done. I’m sure that if he’d done it while he was leader, warmly endorsed the homophobes and then dragged his feet over publicly apologising, they’d have had something to say.

 

In any event, your efforts to delegitimise them don’t detract from the criticism of Starmer. Unless senior Labour politicians failing to adequately distance themselves from extremist views isn’t a Bad Thing any more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Strontium Dog™ said:

This is the Starmer thread, therefore a question about whether LGBT+ Labour are breaking with precedent by criticising Starmer publicly is completely relevant.


If you can provide a precedent for a serving Labour leader ignoring their requests for a public apology and deletion, we’ll be able to judge won’t we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Duff Man said:

Sure, that's definitely an example of what I'm talking about, and it's painful reading that back. I was 23 and clearly a clueless bell-end, prone to casual homophobia. What's your point?

Seeing as you are in your late 30’s now you’d think that you’d understand the butt of the joke in the ‘pushing back’ joke is the repressed ‘straight’ guy who tries to justify sex with a man that despite enjoying it he can’t be gay because (drum roll please) he didn’t push back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rico1304 said:

Seeing as you are in your late 30’s now you’d think that you’d understand the butt of the joke in the ‘pushing back’ joke is the repressed ‘straight’ guy who tries to justify sex with a man that despite enjoying it he can’t be gay because (drum roll please) he didn’t push back. 

Pitiful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Duff Man said:

Sure, that's definitely an example of what I'm talking about, and it's painful reading that back. I was 23 and clearly a clueless bell-end, prone to casual homophobia. What's your point?

The fact that you were once homophobic and now you consider yourself not, making you quite quick to jump on it when you think you see it. Bit like the anti smoking ex smoker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, A Red said:

The fact that you were once homophobic and now you consider yourself not, making you quite quick to jump on it when you see it. Bit like the anti smoking ex smoker.

Yes a perfect simile. You are very smart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Duff Man said:

You can barely understand anything. The connotations of that joke are well established and understood, and your google-sourced equivocation doesn't change that.

I’ve not googled anything, it’s just the way the joke has always been used.  
 

Look I’m sorry that when you were a homophobic cunt I was dancing the night away in Heaven and Paradise.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Rico1304 said:

I’ve not googled anything, it’s just the way the joke has always been used.  
 

Look I’m sorry that when you were a homophobic cunt I was dancing the night away in Heaven and Paradise.  

Yeah sure, and so confident were you in its positive message for the gay community, you immediately articulated that rather than searching through all my old posts.

 

And again, it absolutely isn't the way that joke's always been used. At all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Duff Man said:

If I had to bet, I'd put money on Labour holding, but yeah the polls are pretty eye-opening.

I thought about putting a few quid on Labour but seeing UKIP getting 28% in 2015 spooked me out. If I was the Conservative candidate I'd just post a pic of Starmer waving an EU flag and a pic of Macron. 

Ey-Pw-W1z-XAAA3-U39-1.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grace is unimpressed.

https://tribunemag.co.uk/2021/04/keir-starmers-first-year-has-been-a-disaster-for-progressives?fbclid=IwAR3Kv9NSKK6eE7xlm8jODlt322eovpGBR0VZE9z0XNrl3bV7brfgy_CRlhc

 

In reality, Starmer has no one to blame for his first year as leader of the opposition but himself. He has alienated socialists by waging a campaign against the Left and suspending Jeremy Corbyn from the party, while simultaneously losing liberals by refusing to oppose one of the most corrupt and authoritarian governments in living memory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Duff Man said:

Yeah sure, and so confident were you in its positive message for the gay community, you immediately articulated that rather than searching through all my old posts.

 

And again, it absolutely isn't the way that joke's always been used. At all.

Oh, I searched it straight away.  You know how when you are accused of something you think ‘hold on, who’s this cunt?’ So that’s what I did, glass houses and all that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Denny Crane said:

I thought about putting a few quid on Labour but seeing UKIP getting 28% in 2015 spooked me out. If I was the Conservative candidate I'd just post a pic of Starmer waving an EU flag and a pic of Macron. 

Ey-Pw-W1z-XAAA3-U39-1.png

An ardent remainer certainly doesn't seem like the best candidate, on the face of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rico1304 said:

Oh, I searched it straight away.  You know how when you are accused of something you think ‘hold on, who’s this cunt?’ So that’s what I did, glass houses and all that. 

Uh-huh. And do tell how the threat of gay sex as an intimidation tactic also has no negative connotations

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...