Jump to content
  • Sign up for free and receive a month's subscription

    You are viewing this page as a guest. That means you are either a member who has not logged in, or you have not yet registered with us. Signing up for an account only takes a minute and it means you will no longer see this annoying box! It will also allow you to get involved with our friendly(ish!) community and take part in the discussions on our forums. And because we're feeling generous, if you sign up for a free account we will give you a month's free trial access to our subscriber only content with no obligation to commit. Register an account and then send a private message to @dave u and he'll hook you up with a subscription.

Tory Cabinet Thread


Bjornebye
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Twats really do think that rules only apply to other people. 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-57914664

 

Natalie Elphicke seems a lovely woman, has a dig at a lad trying to feed hungry kids yet at the same time knew she’d tried to influence legal proceedings of her sex-predator ex-husband 

And what kind of punishment is a one day suspension from parliament  imagine if any “normal” person had tried to influence a judge ? 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to check where we're up to, this Government 

•  is bringing in laws to ban protests

•  is bringing in laws to restrict the right to vote

•  has passed legislation to give UK service personnel immunity if they commit war crimes

• has passed legislation to allow undercover "spycops" to commit any crime with impunity

•   is bringing in a law to make it illegal to help rescue asylum seekers from the danger of drowning

•  is bringing in a law to hit journalists with up to 14 years in prison if they publish a leak that embarrasses the Government 

and

•  temporarily mandated the wearing of face coverings, for non-exempt people, in enclosed, indoor, public places.

 

One of these measures brought crowds onto the street in defence of "freedom".

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Just to check where we're up to, this Government 

•  is bringing in laws to ban protests

•  is bringing in laws to restrict the right to vote

•  has passed legislation to give UK service personnel immunity if they commit war crimes

• has passed legislation to allow undercover "spycops" to commit any crime with impunity

•   is bringing in a law to make it illegal to help rescue asylum seekers from the danger of drowning

•  is bringing in a law to hit journalists with up to 14 years in prison if they publish a leak that embarrasses the Government 

and

•  temporarily mandated the wearing of face coverings, for non-exempt people, in enclosed, indoor, public places.

 

One of these measures brought crowds onto the street in defence of "freedom".

 

They’ll legalise owning guns next. There’s hardly any difference between this current version of the Tories and the Republicans in America.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Vincent Vega said:

They’ll legalise owning guns next. There’s hardly any difference between this current version of the Tories and the Republicans in America.

That's just what I was thinking reading the previous post, listing their policies is so reminiscent of Trump's four years. I'm waiting for them to announce a wall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, AngryOfTuebrook said:

Just to check where we're up to, this Government 

•  is bringing in laws to ban protests

•  is bringing in laws to restrict the right to vote

•  has passed legislation to give UK service personnel immunity if they commit war crimes

• has passed legislation to allow undercover "spycops" to commit any crime with impunity

•   is bringing in a law to make it illegal to help rescue asylum seekers from the danger of drowning

•  is bringing in a law to hit journalists with up to 14 years in prison if they publish a leak that embarrasses the Government 

and

•  temporarily mandated the wearing of face coverings, for non-exempt people, in enclosed, indoor, public places.

 

One of these measures brought crowds onto the street in defence of "freedom".

 

This is the kind of thing Labour should be leafleting or shouting from the rooftops infact not just Labour but every single politician or journalist against this ideology, simple precise points showing exactly what these cunts are doing.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Bobby Hundreds said:

This is the kind of thing Labour should be leafleting or shouting from the rooftops infact not just Labour but every single politician or journalist against this ideology, simple precise points showing exactly what these cunts are doing.

 

I takes a second to tell a convincing lie, it takes a week to disprove it, by which time the worlds moved on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bobby Hundreds said:

This is the kind of thing Labour should be leafleting or shouting from the rooftops infact not just Labour but every single politician or journalist against this ideology, simple precise points showing exactly what these cunts are doing.

If they did that though , people might expect them to repeal them if they ever got into power,

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sir roger said:

If they did that though , people might expect them to repeal them if they ever got into power,

So they should, its like these elite twats are looking at the Chinese elite and thinking these fuckers have got it all, huge wealth and power with absolute obedience! us toff bastards should have that too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ffs I don't know who's fault it is but Dawn Butler should not have gone out on her own today, the biggest splash would have been made had it been done en masse in one sitting.

I applaud Butler, good on her. But this opposition is a fucking shambles, Starmer as useful as a chocolate teapot the fucking fanny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just watching the Manchester Ariana Grande bombing enquiry, seems a lot of these murdering scumbags had links to Libya and were fuelled by David  Camerons disastrous foray into the country but of course Cameron wouldn't have gained power without the lemons who voted for him and also by getting by with a little help from his friends the lib dems.

 

It's hard to think of a more despicable cunt in Britain than David Cameron and its a packed field.

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2017/5/29/libya-and-the-manchester-connection

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Captain Turdseye said:

Imagine how big the news would be if Starmer did that…

 

He kind of did the other week.

 

 

 

Made the news if i remember rightly.

 

 

Effectively without calling him a liar saying you lied and you're on notice as it's a resignation offence.

 

He's taking him apart every week and the comms team ae now much better it seems.

 

They should all back Butler now and come out in support, if you write to your MP they have to pass on your concerns to the house and if every MP, or even some, raise it it needs to be addressed by the speaker legally, it's the only way around not being able to call the fat, lying sack of shit a liar in the house without being expelled.

 

Butlers follow up...

 

 

I hope this gets traction as it's not something the press can ignore.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:

 

He kind of did the other week.

 

Made the news if i remember rightly.

 

 

Effectively without calling him a liar saying you lied and you're on notice as it's a resignation offence.

 

He's taking him apart every week and the comms team ae now much better it seems.

 

They should all back Butler now and come out in support, if you write to your MP they have to pass on your concerns to the house and if every MP, or even some, raise it it needs to be addressed by the speaker legally, it's the only way around not being able to call the fat, lying sack of shit a liar in the house without being expelled.

 

Butlers follow up...

 

 

I hope this gets traction as it's not something the press can ignore.

 

 

 

There will probably be a story in the daily cunt about her not recycling properly or something any-day now 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:

 

He kind of did the other week.

 

 

Made the news if i remember rightly.

 

Effectively without calling him a lier saying you lied and you're on notice as it's a resignation offence.

 

He's taking him apart every week and the comms team ae now much better it seems.

 

They should al back Butler now and come out in support, if you write to your MP they have to pass on your cocerns to the house and if every MP, or even some, raise it it needs to be addressed by the speaker legally, it the only way around not being able to call the fat, lying sack of shit a liar in the house.

 

Butlers follow up...

 

 

I hope this gets traction as it's not something the press can ignore.

 

 

 

Re Starmer, sorry but "as good as" is not good enough.  Many on the opposition benches question Johnson's honesty nearly every PMQs, but stop short of calling him a liar. Starmer's blunt arrows do nothing, barely even get near Johnson. As for resignation offences, do they even exist any more unless your own party wants to move you aside?  How can Starmer not have noticed? Useless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Moo said:

Re Starmer, sorry but "as good as" is not good enough.  Many on the opposition benches question Johnson's honesty nearly every PMQs, but stop short of calling him a liar. Starmer's blunt arrows do nothing, barely even get near Johnson. As for resignation offences, do they even exist any more unless your own party wants to move you aside?  How can Starmer not have noticed? Useless.

 

As true as that maybe, we're all screaming in to the void until something sticks.

 

This is a war, not a scrap though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:

 

He kind of did the other week.

 

 

 

Made the news if i remember rightly.

 

 

Effectively without calling him a liar saying you lied and you're on notice as it's a resignation offence.

 

He's taking him apart every week and the comms team ae now much better it seems.

 

They should all back Butler now and come out in support, if you write to your MP they have to pass on your concerns to the house and if every MP, or even some, raise it it needs to be addressed by the speaker legally, it's the only way around not being able to call the fat, lying sack of shit a liar in the house without being expelled.

 

Butlers follow up...

 

 

I hope this gets traction as it's not something the press can ignore.

 

 

 

I doubt they'll back her up. She's a bit too 'lefty' to be afforded that kind of support. Hope I'm wrong like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rushies tash said:

I doubt they'll back her up. She's a bit too 'lefty' to be afforded that kind of support. Hope I'm wrong like.

 

Same, I think this could be a big moment if it's handled properly.

 

If the polling is correct and there's been a fairly noticable swing then this is the kind of stuff that will get attention of the Tory backbench bellends as 'Johnson is a liar' is cutting through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...