Tory Cabinet Thread

[Bruce Spanner]

5 minutes ago, cloggypop said:

Lord Lebedev of Moscow

‘Lord Baron Lebedev of Hampton in our London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and of Siberia in the Russian Federation”.

 

This is genuinely so he didn’t offend Putin by being lord such and such of Moscow.

[Section_31]

Imagine if Corbyn had won and put a ruskie spook's spawn in the highest chamber in the land, there'd have been a military coup.

 

That's what I can't handle with these cunts, it's the constantly shifting goalposts. The whole system, from the billionaire bought and paid for media, to the slippery fuck in no.10, are just dripping in hypocrisy.

[Bjornebye]

41 minutes ago, Section_31 said:

Imagine if Corbyn had won and put a ruskie spook's spawn in the highest chamber in the land, there'd have been a military coup.

 

That's what I can't handle with these cunts, it's the constantly shifting goalposts. The whole system, from the billionaire bought and paid for media, to the slippery fuck in no.10, are just dripping in hypocrisy.

HYPOCRISY is the one. Deflect, ignore, do. 

 

Slimy cunts. 

[Duff Man]

There aren't even any goalposts at this point. Remember this shit?

 

[Megadrive Man]

1 hour ago, Section_31 said:

Imagine if Corbyn had won and put a ruskie spook's spawn in the highest chamber in the land, there'd have been a military coup.

 

That's what I can't handle with these cunts, it's the constantly shifting goalposts. The whole system, from the billionaire bought and paid for media, to the slippery fuck in no.10, are just dripping in hypocrisy.

 

If Corbyn had overseen a shitshow even half as bad as this last 12 months, there would be people calling for him to have been Hanged, drawn and quartered by now. The narrative would be, I told you they can't keep the country safe and will damage the economy etc. 

 

The pandemic could, and should be the platform for a real positive change, more than the likes of a Corbyn lead Labour party ever could have dreamed of. It won't be though. Any negative changes as a result of Brexit will try and be blamed on the pandemic, and if that doesn't work it will be blamed on Johnson personally. He will be out on his ear and Sunak or Gove will be drafted in to steady the ship. Come election time the Tories will somehow manage to stand on a platform of who better to rebuild our economy, despite being the catalyst to decisions that have fucked the economy more than wildest estimates could have predicted. 

 

In the short term, and by short term I mean the next election, I really don't see anything changing. It doesn't matter what the Tories do, bad news doesn't stick to them because it all just gets dismissed and brushed under the carpet. 

 

[Gnasher]

8 hours ago, Duff Man said:

There aren't even any goalposts at this point. Remember this shit?

 

Yeah imagine the mess we'd be in now if that Bolshoi Bastard got in power.

[Bruce Spanner]

[Anubis]

That’s one scary take on Gavin Williamson!

[Rico1304]

not quite the £25k the Haunted Pencil claimed.  

[Dougie Do'ins]

12 hours ago, Duff Man said:

There aren't even any goalposts at this point. Remember this shit?

 

Unforgivable that. It was my turning point with the BBC.

[Rico1304]

Democracy 

 

 

[A Red]

The UK doesnt need 25k from UNICEF, anyone that thinks it proves the UK is fuck

On 18/12/2020 at 21:22, MegadriveMan said:

 

 

 

If you want to stop Unicef feeding kids in this country don't create an economic environment where more and more kids in this country are going hungry!

 

 

You do realise that this country doesnt need money from Unicef?

[Megadrive Man]

1 minute ago, A Red said:

The UK doesnt need 25k from UNICEF, anyone that thinks it proves the UK is fuck

You do realise that this country doesnt need money from Unicef?

 

Yes, that's my point?

[A Red]

Just now, MegadriveMan said:

 

Yes, that's my point?

Is it? Sorry

 

My point is that no kids need to go hungry here, there is plenty in place to help them. Unicef should concentrate elsewhere.

[AngryOfTuebrook]

13 hours ago, A Red said:

Is it? Sorry

 

My point is that no kids need to go hungry here, there is plenty in place to help them. Unicef should concentrate elsewhere.

There is nowhere near enough in place to help them: that’s the point here.

 

There are billions being hoarded and billions being squandered, while people are dying in doorways and working people are dependent on handouts from charities to feed their children.  Poverty in a rich country is the political choice of the ruling party.  As a nation, we have become numb, indifferent and accepting of the most grotesque injustices. 

[AngryOfTuebrook]

Me, after I've watched the news. 

 

 

[Creator Supreme]

6 hours ago, AngryofTuebrook said:

There is nowhere near enough in place to help them: that’s the point here.

 

There are billions being hoarded and billions being squandered, while people are dying in doorways and working people are dependent on handouts from charities to feed their children.  Poverty in a rich country is the political choice of the ruling party.  As a nation, we have become numb, indifferent and accepting of the most grotesque injustices. 

Superb post!

[Stickman]

Must admit a while ago  I was thinking of putting Liz Truss in the milf thread but I guess the last few months have certainly been hard on her too 

 

[Vincent Vega]

How is she even allowed near parliament, never mind be in charge of law and order? 

 

[Bjornebye]

2 hours ago, Vincent Vega said:

How is she even allowed near parliament, never mind be in charge of law and order? 

 

look at the face on her when being asked a question she doesn’t want to be! Utter contempt and and evil in her eyes while he’s talking!!!!! 

[Nelly-Szoboszlai]

Michael Gove's daughter on TikTok, apparently... 

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/a_leesha1/status/1345364793067245570

 

 

[Bruce Spanner]

Hancock on Ridge just swerved a question about Trumps Twitter being suspended he did waffle in to saying though that it’s seems like an editorial policy and maybe this needs to be looked as as an editorial choice, so they become news providers?

 

I remember something about this from a while back and there being a kick off, can’t fully remember though, anybody help out? 

[Bjornebye]

22 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:

Hancock on Ridge just swerved a question about Trumps Twitter being suspended he did waffle in to saying though that it’s seems like an editorial policy and maybe this needs to be looked as as an editorial choice, so they become news providers?

 

I remember something about this from a while back and there being a kick off, can’t fully remember though, anybody help out? 

You’re using there being a kick off as a trigger for people to remember something ? You could start a thread about favourite brand of toilet paper and two pages in it would be like the fucking Alamo. 

[Bruce Spanner]

1 minute ago, Bjornebye said:

You’re using there being a kick off as a trigger for people to remember something ? You could start a thread about favourite brand of toilet paper and two pages in it would be like the fucking Alamo. 

No, I meant the n the media.

 

I’ve had a look around and it’s about being a publisher and being responsible for what is published.

 

So anonymity would be under threat and there would be regulations more aligned with the press, plus, of course, taxation. 

[Bjornebye]

8 minutes ago, Bruce Spanner said:

No, I meant the n the media.

 

I’ve had a look around and it’s about being a publisher and being responsible for what is published.

 

So anonymity would be under threat and there would be regulations more aligned with the press, plus, of course, taxation. 

Oh right. Trump got fucked off because he incited a riot.