Quantcast
Report: Karius to return to Liverpool after Besiktas loan - FF - Football Forum - The Liverpool Way Jump to content
TLW

Report: Karius to return to Liverpool after Besiktas loan

Recommended Posts

Loris Karius is heading back to Liverpool at the end of the season.
 

The German goalkeeper’s two year loan spell with Besiktas concludes in May and The Mirror (via The Athletic) says that the Turkish club have no plans to trigger the buy-on clause to make the deal permanent.

The spell of Karius in England was littered with high profile blunders highlighted by his calamitous performance in the 2018 Champions League final and those mistakes have continued to haunt him in Turkey.

 

loris-karius.jpg

So much so that last March Senol Gunes his manager at the time said:

“Karius has gone a bit stagnant, something is wrong with his electricity, motivation, enthusiasm for the game."

The 26 year-old will return to his parent club, but he will do so in the knowledge that there is no future for him at the Reds.

Not only is his replacement Alisson firmly ensconced as the No 1, he is widely acknowledged as the best goalkeeper in World Football.

The backup role is ably filled by Adrian who did a fine job at the start of the season when the Brazilian was out with a calf injury.

While youngster Caoimhín Kelleher has gained experience in domestic cup competitions.

So all that means that the inconsistent German will be on the lookout for another club.

There is a wide held view that goalkeepers mature much later that their outfield colleagues so in that sense Karius has many years to make an impression in the game.

Just how much the Reds can get for him will be very interesting to note.





 


View full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at the difference between Karius and alisson. They were bought by the same scouting department and yet the difference between them is light years. Shows that even using data, statistics and what not, nobody is assured of a 100% hit rate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Karuis's performance in the European cup final was not his fault.

 

I watched the match at Anfield on the gigantic screen, in the kop. 

 

It was the single most disastrous display I, personally, have ever seen.

 

But he didn't mean it, and I think it's fucked for Reds to hold it against the boy.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Bad Red Bull said:

Look at the difference between Karius and alisson. They were bought by the same scouting department and yet the difference between them is light years. Shows that even using data, statistics and what not, nobody is assured of a 100% hit rate

 

Or one cost £4m and one cost £67m because the stats were very different.

 

For £4m we knew we were buying potential whilst for £67m we were buying the best

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Kevin D said:

Karuis's performance in the European cup final was not his fault.

 

I watched the match at Anfield on the gigantic screen, in the kop. 

 

It was the single most disastrous display I, personally, have ever seen.

 

But he didn't mean it, and I think it's fucked for Reds to hold it against the boy.


Spot on, Kev. 
 


Bring a red home.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, chrisbonnie said:

I fear for the lads mental health, I really do. 

 

 

Rejection and depression is a terrible and awful thing, but nowhere near as terrible and awful as his goalkeeping.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, redheart said:

 

Or one cost £4m and one cost £67m because the stats were very different.

 

For £4m we knew we were buying potential whilst for £67m we were buying the best

Am not condemning the scouting department dude, he was seen as the answer for us and  unfortunately it didn't work out. Alisson would have been lot cheaper if we had bought him instead of Karius

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the guardian at the time of the deal....

 

The deal would become a permanent £7.25m transfer should Besiktas qualify for Europe and Karius play a sufficient number of matches.

 

he plays most weeks doesn't he? So will besiktas get in Europe?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Barry Wom said:

I thought there was an automatically triggered clause if he played enough games?

 

In the last 2 years, we've won the European cup, the world club cup, the super cup and have effectively ended a 30 year title drought.

 

And Barry still vaguely remembers the intricacies of Lloris Karius's loan contract; Wom is taking no chances.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Barry Wom said:

From the guardian at the time of the deal....

 

The deal would become a permanent £7.25m transfer should Besiktas qualify for Europe and Karius play a sufficient number of matches.

 

he plays most weeks doesn't he? So will besiktas get in Europe?

 

Haha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, chrisbonnie said:

I fear for the lads mental health, I really do. 

 

 

So do I Chris. He's clearly a bag of nerves, he looks completely broken, and for the sake of his long term mental health I honestly think he needs to retire from football altogether. Step away from the spotlight and scrutiny and the pressures that must obviously bring, allow himself the space and privacy needed to fully recover.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, redheart said:

 

Or one cost £4m and one cost £67m because the stats were very different.

 

For £4m we knew we were buying potential whilst for £67m we were buying the best

That said,  Karius was the best goalkeeper in Germany in the 18 months before we signed him. Calm, cool, assured, authorative, confident, everything he wasn't for us.

 

The only time I can remember being more surprised that one of our signings bombed for us was Christian Zeige, another German.

 

Timo Werner, buyer beware...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Barry Wom said:

From the guardian at the time of the deal....

 

The deal would become a permanent £7.25m transfer should Besiktas qualify for Europe and Karius play a sufficient number of matches.

 

he plays most weeks doesn't he? So will besiktas get in Europe?


I read the article yesterday and I’m pretty sure it said Besiktas are currently 7th in their league. Sounds like they could really use a proper goalkeeper. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Chip Butty said:

Rejection and depression is a terrible and awful thing, but nowhere near as terrible and awful as his goalkeeping.

Haha. Harsh.

I'm sorry of the lad has mental issues but not making the grade probably happens to most young footballers . He must have made a few bob so he has options and getting away from professional football must be a sensible choice. 

Klopp probably partly to blame for persevering too long with the fella when it was plain to see he wasn't up to the job.

Anyway it kick-started the club , a few seasons too late imo, to go and buy a proven star keeper. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, sir roger said:

Wasn't there some talk that Adrian has got his eye on a return to his first club , so Karius might be back-up for next season.

Shudder...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, sir roger said:

Wasn't there some talk that Adrian has got his eye on a return to his first club , so Karius might be back-up for next season.

 

hnimhogkw6ey.gif

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, redheart said:

 

Or one cost £4m and one cost £67m because the stats were very different.

 

For £4m we knew we were buying potential whilst for £67m we were buying the best

I mean this is clearly the right answer. Trying to compare the Karius and Alisson deals and being confused as to why both players didn’t yield the same outcome is akin to being baffled on why a Ford Fiesta doesn’t have the acceleration as a Ferrari or the teller at your local bank branch isn’t closing deals at JP Morgan. Both players were priced accordingly (and no, Karius was never ever ever better than Manuel Neuer .. or else he wouldn’t be sold for £4 million from a mature European league). He didn’t make it at City as a youth player, he then had a couple of half decent mid table seasons after going there on a free transfer and has crashed and regressed since. It’s normal. A lot of players’ trajectories just aren’t noticed because they don’t come to Liverpool FC in the middle of it. If anything he should probably be thankful that he’s been paid and given contracts way above his talent warrants, presumably. He was catastrophic for us - almost dumped us out of Europe twice before the eventual happened.
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Last Match Report

  • Latest Posts

    • Charlie Nicholas has offered a somewhat critical view regarding the form of Virgil Van Dijk this season.

      The Sky Sports pundit believes the Dutchman has not been at the same level as he was last year.

      Football 365 via Sky Sports reported the former Arsenal striker as saying:

      "Has he been as good as last year? No. 

      “He looks cumbersome and sluggish at times, but his pace can rescue him.

      “He has pace and purpose on the ball, while having a great awareness of danger He never jumps in and rarely dives in.

      “If someone is really quick, they may have a chance, or if a player is tricky, they could send him the wrong way, but he stands up and asks them to do something, meaning the player would normally lay it off.   "He has an authority within the game."

      While thinking that Van Dijk has not been up to his elite standards this campaign, Nicholas does not doubt his ability and still believes he should be in the Premier League team of the season.  

      “Is he as good as what people think?   "Yes, he is that good. People are scared to test him. Little balls in behind can make him vulnerable, but who isn’t? 

      “He is a leader and has such a response of being on the ball, whether it be 10 yards or 60.   "He is good in the air both in attack and defence, he has to be in the team of the season.”




       
      View full article
    • Isn't it just Johnny H? 
    • OK. Let's try the debating thing.   The first point about "sound economic judgement" is demonstrable bullshit.  In 2010 when David Cameron's coke-addled fag (in the public school sense of the word) launched a decade of cuts to jobs, pay, pensions, services and benefits he did so "to deal decisively with our country's record debts". https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/jun/22/emergency-budget-full-speech-text   After 9 years of Tory rule, the National Debt had increased by £760 billion. https://www.statista.com/statistics/281761/national-debt-of-the-united-kingdom-uk/   By the Tories' own measure, their handling of the economy has been a calamitous failure.   The second point about "realistic social responsibility" is baffling. What the fuck does it mean? I would argue that, realistically, a wealthy country has a social responsibility to provide decent jobs, decent and sufficient housing, proper pensions, investment in technologies to minimise and mitigate climate change, efficient public services, free access to good quality education and  - of course  - universal, comprehensive healthcare, free at the point of use. Presumably, based on their track record, Tories would have a significantly different interpretation of that phrase.   If @CurtisJones hasn't skulked off to lurk for a couple more years, like some neoliberal cicada, maybe he could clarify what he means by "realistic social responsibility".
    • Yeah, but £107m losses one season can easily be turned around, y'know, with Champions League revenue, matchday income from the magnificent new stadium, high-value sales of one or two of their world class squad, lucrative sponsorship deals tapping the potential of their global fanbase, etc.
  • Latest Round Up

  • Popular Contributors

  • Football Betting Site Betway
  • Online Bingo
×